The statements of the chain, as propositions #
The links of the proof are stated here as propositions. All of them except RowBound and
MainTheoremImproved are proved, with no hypothesis, in the directories DetLow, DetBij,
TwoSided, Level, Average and Row and in MainTheorem.lean; the proofs are assembled in
Chain.lean. Numbering refers to the paper.
DetInequality— the determinant inequality (Corollary 3.2)AntipodalInequality— the antipodal inequality (Theorem 4.3)TwoSidedInequality— the two-sided inequality (Theorem 5.4)IntegratedAllPairsInequality— the integrated all-pairs inequality, for a real function with a row at every point (Proposition 7.4)ThirdMomentInequality— the third-moment inequality (Theorem 7.6)MeanIncrementBound— the bound for the mean absolute increments of a function with rows of cost at mostK(Theorem 7.10)InfluenceBound— the bound for the influences of a function with rows of cost at mostK(Theorem 8.3)SensitivityBound— the sensitivity of a bounded function of degree at mostd, at every point (Corollary 6.10)MainTheorem— the main theorem (Theorem 1.1)MeanIncrementDegreeBound— the bound for the mean absolute increments of a bounded function of degree at mostd(Corollary 7.11)RowBound— the row bound of Agarwal and Ben-David (Theorem 1.7 of arXiv:2410.19062); it is not proved in this project and is used only as a named hypothesis, never as an axiomMainTheoremImproved— the main theorem with the constant thatRowBoundgives (Remark 8.4); it is proved fromRowBound
The all-pairs inequality for Boolean functions (Proposition 5.2) is stated in
AllPairsDefs.lean, the two halves of the proof of the determinant inequality in DetDefs.lean,
and the links of the proof of the row bound (Theorem 6.8) in RowDefs.lean.
A row of a real function f at every point is given as a family a : Cube ι → ι → ℝ with
0 ≤ a x j and |f x - f y| ≤ ∑_{j ∈ Δ(x,y)} a x j for all x, y; its cost at x is
∑_j a x j. (This is Definition 2.3 of the paper, with y = x^S and S = Δ(x,y).) The mean
absolute increment of f in the coordinate j is L_j(f) = meanAbsIncr f j = E_x |f x - f (x^j)|,
and L(f) = ∑_j L_j(f).
The determinant inequality (Corollary 3.2 of the paper).
For every Boolean g, all positive lengths ℓ, and every choice of
1-wings A u at the points u of zone g: if d u is at most the length of every
G disjoint from A u with g ((antipode u)^G) = true, then ∑_{u ∈ zone g} d u
is at most ∑_j ℓ_j b_j(g). (So d u may be taken to be the minimum D_g(u, A u; ℓ).)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The antipodal inequality (the inequality of Theorem 4.3 of the paper).
For every Boolean g, all positive weights w and every row field lam:
∑_{u ∈ zone g} 1 / (∑_j w_j lam^u_j lam^{ū}_j) ≤ ∑_j b_j(g) / w_j.
(The reciprocal is ⁻¹, with 0⁻¹ = 0 in Lean; that the denominators are positive is the other
assertion of Theorem 4.3 and is not part of this proposition.)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The two-sided inequality (the inequality of Theorem 5.4 of the paper).
For every Boolean g and every row field lam, with v x = 1 / ‖lam x‖₁:
4 · E[v · 1_{g = true}] · E[v · 1_{g = false}] ≤ τ whenever τ ≥ 0 bounds all influences
I_j(g). (In the paper g is not constant and τ = max_j I_j(g).)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The integrated all-pairs inequality (the inequality of Proposition 7.4 of the paper). For a
real function f on the cube, a row a x of f at every point x and all positive weights w:
∑_{(x,y) : f y < f x} (f x - f y)^3 / (6 s_xy) ≤ 4^(n-1) ∑_j L_j(f) / w_j, where
s_xy = ∑_{j ∈ Δ(x,y)} w_j a^x_j a^y_j and L_j(f) = meanAbsIncr f j = E_x |f x - f (x^j)|.
(That the sums s_xy in the denominators are positive is the other assertion of
Proposition 7.4: Level.pairSum_pos. The exponent n - 1 is a difference of natural numbers;
for n = 0 it is 0, and both sides of the inequality are 0.)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The third-moment inequality (the first inequality of Theorem 7.6 of the paper). If f has a
row of cost at most K at every point and M ≥ 0 bounds all the mean absolute increments
L_j(f) = meanAbsIncr f j, then for every real r
E[((f - r)⁺)^3] · Pr[f ≤ r] ≤ (3/2) K² M. (The second inequality of Theorem 7.6, for (r - f)⁺
and Pr[f ≥ r], is this one for -f and -r: Level.thirdMoment_lower.)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The bound for the mean absolute increments (Theorem 7.10 of the paper). If f has a row of
cost at most K at every point and Var(f) > 0, then some coordinate j has
Var(f)^3 ≤ 36 K^4 L_j(f)^2, that is, E_x |f(x) - f(x^j)| ≥ Var(f)^{3/2} / (6 K²). No bound on
the values of f is assumed. (The other assertions of Theorem 7.10, n ≥ 1 and K > 0, hold
because the variance is positive; K > 0 is Level.cost_pos. The statement of the paper with
all its assertions is Bridge.MeanIncrementPrinted.)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The bound for the influences (Theorem 8.3 of the paper). If f has a row of cost at most K
at every point and Var(f) > 0, then some coordinate j has
3 Var(f)^5 ≤ 3125 L(f)² K^4 Inf_j(f)^2, where L(f) = ∑_k L_k(f) is the sum of the mean
absolute increments; that is, Inf_j(f) ≥ (√15 / 125) Var(f)^{5/2} / (L(f) K²). No bound on the
values of f is assumed. (The other assertions of Theorem 8.3: 0 < L(f) is
Average.sum_meanAbsIncr_pos, and L(f) ≤ K is Level.sum_meanAbsIncr_le_cost. The statement
of the paper with all its assertions is Bridge.InfluencePrinted.)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The main theorem (Theorem 1.1 of the paper). Every f on the cube with |f| ≤ 1, degree at
most d and positive variance has a coordinate j with
3 Var(f)^5 ≤ 50000 π^8 d^12 Inf_j(f)^2, that is,
Inf_j(f) ≥ (√15 / (500 π^4)) Var(f)^{5/2} / d^6. (The paper assumes n ≥ 1 and d ≥ 1 in place
of positive variance; these hold when the variance is positive, and for variance 0 there is
nothing to prove.)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The bound for the mean absolute increments of a bounded function of low degree
(Corollary 7.11 of the paper). Every f on the cube with |f| ≤ 1, degree at most d and
positive variance has a coordinate j with Var(f)^3 ≤ 36 π^8 d^8 L_j(f)^2, that is,
E_x |f(x) - f(x^j)| ≥ Var(f)^{3/2} / (6 π^4 d^4).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The row bound of Agarwal and Ben-David (Theorem 1.7 of arXiv:2410.19062): every
f : {0,1}^n → [0,1] of degree at most d has weights c x i with
∑_{i : x_i ≠ y_i} c x i ≥ |f x - f y| for all x, y and ∑_i c x i ≤ (π²/4) d² for all x.
(Nonnegativity of the weights is not required: it follows from the first condition
with y = x^i.) This proposition is not proved in the project; it occurs only as a
hypothesis.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The main theorem with the constant that the row bound of Agarwal and Ben-David gives
(Remark 8.4 of the paper). Every f on the cube with |f| ≤ 1, degree at most d and positive
variance has a coordinate j with 3 Var(f)^5 ≤ 3125 π^8 d^12 Inf_j(f)^2, that is,
Inf_j(f) ≥ (√15 / (125 π^4)) Var(f)^{5/2} / d^6. It is proved from the hypothesis RowBound.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.