The Doeblin chain at large β #
At each rate, the uniqueness of the stationary distribution and the convergence to it come from
the same three facts as always — a corner at the worst income state, decline above it, and the
worst state reachable from everywhere — but at Aiyagari's β = 0.96 each has to come from a
route that does not carry 1/(1-β) or 1/(1-βR) in a constant.
- The corner from the Euler inequality (
crra_policy_eq_zero_of_euler), whose test isβR · minIncome^(-γ) < (income z₀ + R a₀)^(-γ)— one inequality, no Lipschitz constant. - Euler-based worst-state decline (
policy_lt_self_of_impatient_iid), which holds at every asset level above the constraint givenβR < 1and iid income. - Cap slack at the fixed point from the minimal MPC (
crra_policy_lt_cap_of_minMPC).
Nothing in this file mentions an oscillation bound.
The exhaustion data at large β, for CRRA, given that consumption is lowest at z₀.
The two ways of supplying that are iid income (crra_exists_exhaust_of_euler_corner) and
monotone transitions (crra_exists_exhaust_of_euler_corner_monotone).
The exhaustion data with iid income.
The exhaustion data with persistent income: monotone transitions in place of iid, via
the income-monotonicity lemma (consumptionFn_le_of_income_le_monotone). The extra iterate-level
hypotheses that lemma needs are supplied by the minimal MPC.
A unique stationary distribution at large β.
Convergence to it from any start, Doeblin with the atom at the constraint.
A unique stationary distribution at large β, with persistent income.
Convergence to it from any start, with persistent income.