The L⁶ bound from an order-0 annulus bound #
This file assembles the L⁶(B(ρ)) bound eq:aniso:closure:elliptic (the Sobolev step of the
closure lemma lem:aniso:closure) and the Gustafson–Kang–Tsai smallness hypothesis from a plain
order-0 bound on a space–time annulus, instantiating the generic cutoff of
l6_ball_bound_of_enstrophy_bound/closure_from_enstrophy_bound with the concrete
CKN.canonicalBallCutoff. The last theorem uses the statement CIV.timeZeroSingularSetNull, an
input of lem:aniso:annulus.
A gradient vanishes at a point outside the topological support of the function.
The gradient of the canonical ball cutoff vanishes inside the inner ball.
If u is bounded by Mu on an annulus {Rlo < |x| < Rhi} × (tη, 0), then the
canonical ball cutoff's gradient bound implies the pointwise squared norm bound
|u(·,t)|² ≤ Mu² wherever ∇χ ≠ 0.
The L⁶ bound on B(ρ) from an order-0 annulus bound: assembles the Sobolev step
l6_ball_bound_of_enstrophy_bound with the canonical ball cutoff.
The closure step from an order-0 annulus bound: with η = 1/(16C_*) the annulus bound
yields the parabolic smallness hypothesis of the Gustafson–Kang–Tsai criterion.
The time-zero singular set null implies the L⁶-smallness condition: from the statement
CIV.timeZeroSingularSetNull and the order-0 annulus bound
exists_annulus_bound_of_timeZeroSingularSetNull, the L⁶ bound on small balls
declines to zero as the radius shrinks, which is the parabolic smallness hypothesis
of the Gustafson–Kang–Tsai criterion.
The window parameter tη of hu, hdiv and hC' ranges over Ioo (-1) 0, the time interval
of the unit cylinder on which the solution class is defined: the radius selection returns its
t₀ there, and a tη ≤ -1 would ask for data at times where u is not given.