The σ ↓ 0 limit and the −q argument of lem:aniso:comparison #
The Grönwall step of the comparison argument produces, for every rate parameter σ > 0, an
almost-everywhere pointwise bound of the slices of q by the barrier Ψ_σ of
eq:aniso:comparison:barrier (CIV.barrier): for a.e. τ in the working interval,
q(·, τ) ≤ Ψ_σ(·, τ) a.e. This file takes that family of bounds, one hypothesis per σ, and
carries out the last two steps of the upper bound of lem:aniso:comparison:
σ ↓ 0(ae_ae_le_of_forall_pos_ae_ae_le_barrier): the barrierbarrier m M σ K τ₀ (x, τ) = M + σ (⟨x⟩ + K(τ - τ₀))is affine inτwith rateσKand, at any fixed(x, τ), converges to the constantMasσ ↓ 0, since the bracketed factor⟨x⟩ + K(τ - τ₀)no longer depends onσ. Passing to the limit along the countable sequenceσ_n = 1/(n+1)turns the family of a.e. bounds into a single a.e. boundq ≤ M.The
−qargument. The two hypotheses of the comparison lemma onq—IsLocallyBoundedOnandIsDistributionalDriftDiffusion— are both closed under negation:IsLocallyBoundedOn.negandIsDistributionalDriftDiffusion.negprove this directly from the definitions rather than asserting it. The second is the substantive check:IsDistributionalDriftDiffusion's pairing is linear, not merely affine, inq— the integrand isq z * (test-function combination), with no additive term independent ofq— so negatingqnegates the integrand pointwise, and both the integrability and the vanishing integral survive unchanged. Consequently, a σ-family bound available for every function satisfying the two hypotheses applies equally toqand to-q, and combining the two one-sided bounds gives|q| ≤ Ma.e. (ae_ae_abs_le_of_isLocallyBoundedOn_isDistributionalDriftDiffusion).
The passage from the a.e. pointwise bound to the essential supremum in the conclusion of the
statement CIV.comparison is comparison_eLpNorm_top_of_ae_dominance. The comparison proof uses
ae_ae_le_of_forall_pos_ae_ae_le_barrier, IsLocallyBoundedOn.neg and
IsDistributionalDriftDiffusion.neg (CIV.ae_ae_le_of_window,
CIV.ae_ae_abs_le_of_isDistributionalDriftDiffusion).
The hypothesis class is closed under negation #
IsLocallyBoundedOn is closed under negation: the a.e. strong measurability and the local
L^∞ bound of q transfer unchanged to -q, since |(-q) z| = |q z|.
IsDistributionalDriftDiffusion is closed under negation. The pairing against a test
function φ is linear in q — q z * (-(timeDeriv m φ z) - gradPair m φ z (B z) - divB z * φ z - partialLaplacian m d φ z), with no summand independent of q — so negating q negates the
integrand pointwise; the integrability of the negated integrand and the vanishing of its integral
both follow directly from the corresponding facts for q.
The σ ↓ 0 limit #
The σ ↓ 0 limit. Given, for every σ > 0, an a.e.-in-τ, a.e.-in-x bound of q by
the barrier barrier m M σ K τ₀ at times at or after the reference time τ₀ — the shape
the Grönwall step of the comparison argument supplies — the same bound holds for q against the
constant
M alone: the barrier reduces to M as σ ↓ 0 at every fixed (x, τ).
The restriction τ₀ ≤ τ is load-bearing and not cosmetic. The barrier is
M + σ (⟨x⟩ + K (τ − τ₀)) with ⟨x⟩ ≥ 1 and K ≥ 0, so for τ below τ₀ it decreases without
bound as τ recedes; an unrestricted hypothesis of this shape, quantified over every σ > 0, is
satisfiable only by a function unbounded below, and in particular never by the bounded q of the
comparison lemma on an interval such as Iio T.
The proof restricts the uncountable family of hypotheses to the countable sequence
σ_n = 1/(n+1), uses ae_all_iff twice (once in τ, once in x) to move the countable
universal quantifier inside both almost-everywhere quantifiers, and then passes to the limit
n → ∞ at each surviving (x, τ).
The restricted barrier hypothesis is satisfiable. At times at or after the reference
time τ₀, K (τ − τ₀) ≥ 0 and
⟨x⟩ ≥ 1, so the barrier sits strictly above M; hence any q bounded above by M satisfies
the hypothesis of ae_ae_le_of_forall_pos_ae_ae_le_barrier, for every σ > 0.
Without the τ₀ ≤ τ restriction no such witness exists: the barrier decreases without bound as
τ recedes below τ₀, so the unrestricted hypothesis is met only by a function unbounded below.
The assembled two-sided bound #
σ ↓ 0 and −q, combined. Given a general form of the Grönwall conclusion of the
comparison argument — the σ-family barrier bound of ae_ae_le_of_forall_pos_ae_ae_le_barrier,
restricted to times at or after the reference time τ₀ (see that lemma's note on why the
restriction is required), available for
every function satisfying the two hypotheses IsLocallyBoundedOn and
IsDistributionalDriftDiffusion rather than only for the fixed q at hand — apply it once to q
and once to -q (licensed by IsLocallyBoundedOn.neg and IsDistributionalDriftDiffusion.neg),
and combine the two resulting one-sided a.e. bounds into |q| ≤ M a.e.