Products of LG-rings #
The product half of GPR 11.21 (GN 2.1(a)): R₁ × R₂ is an LG-ring iff R₁ and R₂ both
are. The Jacobson-quotient half is in LGRing/Jacobson.lean; the two combine in
LGRing/Semilocal.lean to give GPR 11.22.
A second, unrelated result closes the file: an arbitrary product of fields is an LG-ring. That
is not a corollary of the binary statement — induction on isLGRing_prod_iff reaches only finite
products — and its proof runs through the value-ideal criterion instead.
Main results #
MvPolynomial.RepresentsUnit.mapOfComm,MvPolynomial.RepresentsUnit.ofMapOfComm: transport ofRepresentsUnitalong a commuting square of ring homomorphisms (aeval_map_comm, inLGRing/Defs.lean), forwards and (when the vertical map is an isomorphism) backwards. Every transport below, and every one inLGRing/Semilocal.lean, is an instance of these.Ideal.prodQuotientFstEquiv,Ideal.prodQuotientSndEquiv: the residue fields ofR₁ × R₂atIdeal.prod 𝔪 ⊤andIdeal.prod ⊤ 𝔪are those ofR₁at𝔪and ofR₂at𝔪.isLGRing_prod_iff:GPR 11.21(ii),IsLGRing (R₁ × R₂) ↔ IsLGRing R₁ ∧ IsLGRing R₂.isLGRing_pi_of_forall_field,isLGRing_pi_field: an arbitrary product∏ᵢ Kᵢof fields — in particularF^Ifor a fieldFand any index setI— is an LG-ring.
Proof idea #
The maximal ideals of R₁ × R₂ are exactly Ideal.prod 𝔪 ⊤ and Ideal.prod ⊤ 𝔪 for 𝔪 maximal
in R₁ resp. R₂ — Ideal.ideal_prod_prime classifies the primes, and maximality transfers both
ways along Ideal.comap_isMaximal_of_surjective and Ideal.map_fst_prod — with the
corresponding residue fields those of the factors.
For ⇐, given p over R₁ × R₂ representing a unit at every residue field, its images
MvPolynomial.map (RingHom.fst _ _) p and map (RingHom.snd _ _) p represent units at every
residue field of R₁ resp. R₂; the LG hypotheses give witnesses s₁, s₂, and
fun i ↦ (s₁ i, s₂ i) is a witness over R₁ × R₂, because IsUnit in a product is
componentwise (Prod.isUnit_iff).
For ⟹, the point is that a polynomial over R₁ must be promoted to one over R₁ × R₂ that
carries no information about R₂. There is no ring homomorphism R₁ → R₁ × R₂ to push it
through — r ↦ (r, 1) is not additive and r ↦ (r, 0) is not unital — but
MvPolynomial.map (RingHom.fst _ _) is surjective, so p₁ has some preimage q, and the
orthogonal idempotents of R₁ × R₂ assemble it into
p := C (1, 0) * q + C (0, 1),
for which map fst p = p₁ while map snd p = 1. Then p represents a unit at every residue
field of R₁ × R₂: on the R₁ side because p₁ does, and on the R₂ side for free, the
constant 1 representing a unit anywhere. The LG hypothesis for R₁ × R₂ yields a witness, whose
first components witness p₁ over R₁.
References #
- [GPR] Garibaldi, Petersson, Racine, Albert Algebras over Commutative Rings, 11.21(ii).
- [GN] Gille, Neher, Group schemes over LG-rings and applications to cancellation theorems and Azumaya algebras, European Journal of Mathematics 11 (2025), article 42, §2.1(a), Example 2.2.
- [EG] Estes, Guralnick, Module equivalences: local to global when primitive polynomials represent units, Journal of Algebra 77 (1982), 138–157.
Transport of RepresentsUnit along a square of ring homomorphisms #
Pushing a RepresentsUnit witness forward along a commuting square.
Pulling a RepresentsUnit witness back along a commuting square whose vertical map is an
isomorphism. This is the direction that needs ψ invertible: the witness is transported by
e.symm and the resulting unit is recognised by applying e.
Maximal ideals and residue fields of a product #
The residue field of R₁ × R₂ at Ideal.prod 𝔪 ⊤ is the residue field of R₁ at 𝔪:
apply the first isomorphism theorem to R₁ × R₂ → R₁ → R₁ ⧸ 𝔪, whose kernel is Ideal.prod 𝔪 ⊤
by Ideal.comap_fst_eq_prod_top.
Equations
Instances For
The residue field of R₁ × R₂ at Ideal.prod ⊤ 𝔪 is the residue field of R₂ at 𝔪.
Equations
Instances For
GPR 11.21(ii) #
Arbitrary products of fields #
An arbitrary product of fields is an LG-ring (GN 2.2, from EG).
By the value-ideal criterion it suffices to turn an equation 1 = Σⱼ cⱼ · p(tⱼ) — finitely many
points tⱼ of (∏ᵢ Kᵢ)ⁿ whose values at p generate the unit ideal — into a single point where
p is a unit. Read that equation off at one index i: the i-th components sum to 1 ≠ 0 in the
field Kᵢ, so some j has p(tⱼ)ᵢ ≠ 0. Choosing such a j = j(i) for every i and splicing,
s x i := t (j i) x i, gives a point whose value has p(s)ᵢ = p(t (j i))ᵢ ≠ 0 in every
coordinate — and a unit in a product is exactly a coordinatewise unit.
A product of fields is von Neumann regular, so this also follows from
IsVonNeumannRegular.isLGRing in LGRing/ZeroDimensional.lean; the direct argument is kept
because it is elementary — no idempotents, no value ideal beyond its unwinding — and because it is
what makes the shape of the general statement visible.
The splicing step is legitimate because evaluation commutes with each projection
∏ᵢ Kᵢ → Kᵢ (MvPolynomial.aeval_map_comm): the i-th coordinate of a value depends on the
i-th coordinates of the point and on nothing else. This is the whole reason the argument needs
the factors to be fields only coordinatewise, with no compatibility between them.
F^I is an LG-ring for a field F and an arbitrary index set I (GN 2.2, from EG);
the constant-family case of isLGRing_pi_of_forall_field.