High-contrast homogenization: Consistency.ConvexDilation #
Imported from the Apache-2.0 HighContrastHomogenization development at commit
7a13dbcd8d6609264a713373f5c69ceeac870472.
Dilation of a convex domain, and global smooth realization #
This module checks the defining predicate MemH1a of H¹_a(V) of
s.introduction, and its zero-trace variant MemH1a0. It checks the requirement in those
classes that a member be approximated in the
H¹_a norm by functions smooth on all of ℝ^d, where the paper's
coefficient-weighted spaces are completions of C^∞(U), the functions smooth
on U: a function smooth on U is carried, by dilation and a cutoff, to a
globally smooth function agreeing with its dilate exactly on closure U, and
exact agreement on an open set makes the two share their coordinate gradients.
Were that check to fail — were the homothety of closure U not to land in
interior U, or the dilate not to have a globally smooth representative
agreeing with it exactly on closure U with the same coordinate gradients —
then the printed completions could not be represented by the globally smooth
approximants that MemH1a demands; the predicate would encode a class smaller
than the space the paper prints, and every statement that assumes a member of
MemH1a, among them the estimates for weak solutions, would be vacuous
precisely where the paper means it to apply. This module is a consistency
check of that definition and is not a result of the paper.
The classical route between the two dilates the domain and then mollifies the function. This module supplies the dilation step and removes the need for the mollification.
The first section is the geometric core: for a convex U carrying an interior
ball around c, the homothety x ↦ c + lam • (x - c) of ratio lam < 1 maps
closure U into interior U, so a function smooth on U becomes, after
dilation, smooth on an open set containing closure U. Neither boundedness
nor openness of U is used; the interior ball is the only nondegeneracy input.
The second section replaces mollification. Because the dilate is smooth on an
open neighbourhood of closure U, a smooth Urysohn cutoff turns it into a
genuinely globally smooth function agreeing with it exactly on closure U,
not merely approximately, and exact agreement on an open set transfers to the
coordinate gradients.
One classical, coefficient-free statement is not settled here: that dilation is
continuous at lam = 1 in L¹(U) × L²(U). Until it is available the membership
classes used here are not known to agree with the printed completions, in either
direction.
The convex dilation lemma #
For a convex U carrying an interior ball around c, the homothety
x ↦ c + lam • (x - c) of ratio lam < 1 centred at c pulls the whole closure
strictly inside: its image lands in interior U. No boundedness of U and no
openness of U is used; the interior ball is the only nondegeneracy input.
The convex dilation lemma. If U is convex and contains the ball of
radius ρ > 0 about c, then for every ratio lam ∈ [0, 1) the homothety
x ↦ c + lam • (x - c) maps closure U into interior U.
The open set on which the dilated function inherits smoothness: the
homothety preimage of interior U.
Equations
- HCPolySupport.HighContrast.dilationDomain c lam U = (fun (x : HCPolySupport.Vec d) => c + lam • (x - c)) ⁻¹' interior U
Instances For
The dilation domain is a neighbourhood of the closure: this is the dilation lemma read as an inclusion of sets.
Smoothness of the dilate on a neighbourhood of the closure. A function
smooth on U only becomes, after dilation, smooth on the open set
dilationDomain c lam U, which by closure_subset_dilationDomain contains
closure U.
The conclusion of this section: from smoothness on U alone one gets a genuine
open neighbourhood of closure U on which the dilate is smooth.
The mollification step is unnecessary #
The classical route to the density converse dilates and then mollifies, and
mollification in L² is the expensive part: the ambient library carries no
Lp-convergence statement for mollifiers. It is not needed here. Because the
previous section delivers smoothness on an open set containing closure U, a smooth Urysohn
cutoff turns the dilate into a genuinely globally smooth function that agrees
with it exactly on closure U, not merely approximately. The cutoff is
exists_contMDiffMap_zero_one_nhds_of_isClosed read through contMDiff_iff_contDiff
for the model modelWithCornersSelf ℝ (Vec d).
Global smooth realization. A function smooth on an open S is realized
exactly on any closed K ⊆ S by a function smooth on all of ℝ^d. This is
the step that replaces mollification.
The two sections combined. On a convex U with an interior ball, a function
smooth on U alone has a dilate that is realized on all of closure U by a
globally smooth function. No mollification, no Lp convergence, no
approximation: the agreement is exact.
Exact agreement on an open set transfers to the coordinate gradients, so the
realization of the previous theorem has the same smoothGrad as the dilate
throughout U. Both summands of h1sNormSqOn therefore see the globally
smooth g and the dilate v ∘ T as the same object on U.