Kummer descent for the split trace power cover #
The normalized split trace cover is obtained from the base curve
u * (1 - u) * v^2 + sigma * u - 1 = 0
by adjoining eta and xi with eta^e = v and xi^d = u * v. This file makes that
two-stage Kummer construction explicit. Oddness is imposed because Mathlib's composite-binomial
criterion currently covers odd exponents; coprimality of d and e is used in the second norm
argument. Neither hypothesis is hidden in a structure field.
The two Kummer root relations really land on the correctly cleared trace-cover polynomial.
Numerator of the quadratic radicand on the rational u-line.
Equations
- BGS.Markoff.splitTraceRadicandNumerator sigma = 1 - Polynomial.C sigma * Polynomial.X
Instances For
Denominator of the quadratic radicand on the rational u-line.
Equations
Instances For
The base trace curve has function equation v^2 = splitTraceRadicand sigma.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The monic quadratic defining the base function field.
Equations
Instances For
The quadratic base root has norm -splitTraceRadicand sigma.
A prime-power root of the base coordinate v cannot already lie in the quadratic base
function field. The obstruction is the rational-function degree -1 of its norm.
The rational parameter u, embedded in the quadratic base function field.
Equations
- BGS.Markoff.splitTraceBaseU sigma = (algebraMap (RatFunc K) (AdjoinRoot (BGS.Markoff.splitTraceBaseKummerPolynomial sigma))) RatFunc.X
Instances For
The quadratic coordinate v in the base function field.
Equations
Instances For
The two base coordinates satisfy the birational trace equation inside the quadratic function field.
The norm of u * v has rational-function degree one. This is the second independent divisor
obstruction used after adjoining the e-th root of v.
The first Kummer polynomial, adjoining eta with eta^e = v.
Equations
- BGS.Markoff.splitTraceEtaKummerPolynomial sigma e = Polynomial.X ^ e - Polynomial.C (BGS.Markoff.splitTraceBaseV sigma)
Instances For
The second Kummer radicand, corresponding to xi^d = u * v.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
After adjoining the e-th root of v, the element u*v is not a q-th power whenever
q is prime and coprime to e. The proof takes two successive norms; their rational-function
degree forces q to divide e, a contradiction.
The second Kummer polynomial, adjoining xi with xi^d = u*v.
Equations
- BGS.Markoff.splitTraceXiKummerPolynomial sigma e d = Polynomial.X ^ d - Polynomial.C (BGS.Markoff.splitTraceXiRadicand sigma e)
Instances For
The three fields in the explicit Kummer tower.
Equations
Instances For
The function field of the split trace curve expressed using the eta coordinate.
Equations
- BGS.Markoff.SplitTraceEtaFunctionField K sigma e = AdjoinRoot (BGS.Markoff.splitTraceEtaKummerPolynomial sigma e)
Instances For
The function field of the split trace curve expressed using the xi coordinate.
Equations
- BGS.Markoff.SplitTraceXiFunctionField K sigma e d = AdjoinRoot (BGS.Markoff.splitTraceXiKummerPolynomial sigma e d)
Instances For
Embed a base-function-field element through both Kummer stages.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The canonical eta root, embedded into the top Kummer field.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The canonical xi root in the top Kummer field.
Equations
- BGS.Markoff.splitTraceXiRoot sigma e d = AdjoinRoot.root (BGS.Markoff.splitTraceXiKummerPolynomial sigma e d)
Instances For
For positive odd coprime exponents, the second Kummer polynomial is irreducible. This is the connectedness step that the printed translate argument does not supply.
The canonical roots of the proved Kummer tower lie on the exact cleared trace-cover
polynomial. This connects the function-field construction back to splitTraceCoverPolynomial.
The iterated Kummer function-field tower for the odd, coprime split trace power cover is a domain. All three irreducibility facts are constructed from the explicit norm-degree arguments above; none is assumed as a field or typeclass parameter. This theorem does not yet identify the tower with a localization or tensor base change of the affine coordinate ring.
Reconstructing the same explicit Kummer tower after an arbitrary extension of the constant field again gives a domain. The remaining scheme-level wall is to identify this reconstructed tower with the localization of the tensor-product base change of the original coordinate ring.