Root counts under arithmetic-progression substitution #
The affine map is a permutation modulo every modulus coprime to its slope. At a prime dividing the slope, the transformed polynomial is constant. These facts supply the root-count identities in the proof of Corollary 1.
The integral substitution used to parametrize a residue class.
Equations
Instances For
The residue-root equivalence induced by an invertible affine substitution.
Equations
- NairTenenbaum.rootsAffine Q q a n hqn = (Equiv.trans ⋯.unit.mulLeft (Equiv.addRight ↑a)).subtypeEquiv ⋯
Instances For
Equation (37)'s substitution preserves root counts at coprime moduli.
At a prime dividing the slope, the value at the residue representative controls every root of the transformed polynomial.
Under the progression's coprimality hypothesis, every modulus sharing a prime with the slope has no roots.
The full root-count formula, including all prime powers and composite moduli.
A permitted arithmetic progression preserves absence of fixed prime divisors, as required when applying Theorem 1 to the substituted family.
The Euler product in the arithmetic-progression corollaries omits primes that divide the progression modulus.
Equations
- NairTenenbaum.progressionSieveProduct Q q x = ∏ p ∈ Finset.filter Nat.Prime (Finset.range (⌊x⌋₊ + 1)) with ¬p ∣ q, (1 - ↑(NairTenenbaum.rootCount Q p) / ↑p)
Instances For
The sieve product for the substituted polynomial is exactly the original product with primes dividing the progression modulus omitted.