Asymptotics of the root leaf-height tail #
Lemma lem:ell_asymp of the paper (source lines 2937–3005) and the identification of the
constants C_μ, D_μ as limits (source lines 562–586, inventory U03), for the analytic
sequence π_0 = 1, π_{k+1} = g(π_k) of PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.Recursion.
- If
μ_1 > 0:π_k / μ_1^kis nondecreasing and bounded, so it converges toC_μ = lim π_k / μ_1^k ≥ 1, andπ_k ∼ C_μ μ_1^k. - If
μ_1 = 0, letκ = min{j ≥ 2 : μ_j > 0}anda = μ_κ. Withβ = log a / (κ - 1),v_k = (log π_k + β) / κ^kis nondecreasing andu_k = v_k + π_k / (a (κ - 1) κ^k)is nonincreasing; both converge tolog D_μ < 0, and0 ≤ κ^k log D_μ - (log π_k + β) ≤ π_k / (a (κ - 1)) → 0. Henceπ_k ∼ μ_κ^{-1/(κ-1)} D_μ^{κ^k}(an asymptotic equivalent, not just a logarithmic estimate), andD_μ = lim π_k^{1/κ^k} ∈ (0, 1).
The proof follows the paper's route; in the second case the paper bounds the tail error using
the superexponential bound π_k ≤ A ξ^{κ^k}, while we use the monotone sandwich
v_k ≤ log D_μ ≤ u_k, which only needs π_k ↓ 0.
∑_{j < k} π_j ≤ 1/μ_0 (geometric domination).
Case μ_1 > 0 #
C_μ = lim_{k → ∞} π_k / μ_1^k (source lines 576–579).
Equations
- PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.leafC μ = Filter.atTop.limUnder fun (k : ℕ) => PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.piSeq μ k / PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.mass μ 1 ^ k
Instances For
π_k / μ_1^k → C_μ (source lines 576–579 and the proof of Lemma lem:ell_asymp(i)).
Lemma lem:ell_asymp(i), with the explicit constant: π_k ∼ C_μ μ_1^k.
Lemma lem:ell_asymp(i): if μ_1 > 0 there is C_μ > 0 with π_k ∼ C_μ μ_1^k.
Case μ_1 = 0 #
v_k = (log π_k + β) / κ^k (κ^{-k} log y_k in the paper, with y_k = μ_κ^{1/(κ-1)} π_k).
Equations
Instances For
log D_μ = lim v_k = sup_k v_k.
Equations
- PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.logD μ = ⨆ (k : ℕ), PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.vSeq μ k
Instances For
D_μ = lim_{k → ∞} π_k^{1/κ^k} (source lines 576–579), as used in Lemma
lem:ell_asymp(ii) (where μ_1 = 0).
Equations
- PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.leafD μ = Filter.atTop.limUnder fun (k : ℕ) => PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.piSeq μ k ^ (1 / ↑(PoissonDeclumping.LeafHeight.kappa μ) ^ k)
Instances For
The tail error estimate after multiplying by κ^k:
0 ≤ κ^k log D_μ - (log π_k + β) ≤ π_k / (μ_κ (κ - 1)).
κ^k log D_μ - log π_k - β → 0: the error of the paper's final display, multiplied
by κ^k, tends to zero.
π_k^{1/κ^k} → D_μ (source lines 576–579).
π_k / (μ_κ^{-1/(κ-1)} D_μ^{κ^k}) → 1.
Lemma lem:ell_asymp(ii), with the explicit constant:
π_k ∼ μ_κ^{-1/(κ-1)} D_μ^{κ^k}.
Lemma lem:ell_asymp(ii): if μ_1 = 0 there is D_μ ∈ (0, 1) with
π_k ∼ μ_κ^{-1/(κ-1)} D_μ^{κ^k}, where κ = min{j ≥ 2 : μ_j > 0} (kappa_eq_sInf_two).