The random-walk toolkit #
Source lines 837–883 ("Random walk toolbox"), inventory B06–B10, B14.
The bridge estimates of Sections 3–5 of the paper (forest estimates, microscopicity, bridge
removal, truncation, the Chen–Stein error terms, Theorems 1.1 and 1.2) use only a handful of
facts about the Łukasiewicz walk S_m = X_1 + ⋯ + X_m (Ψ_m(x) = walkProb μ m x) and its
normalizing sequence a. StableToolkit μ α a collects exactly these facts, stated as honest
inequalities and limits about walkProb, walkLaw and a. The bridge lemmas of Sections 3–5 take
this structure as their hypothesis; it is derived from the paper's standing assumption by
PoissonDeclumping.Stable.stableToolkit : StableDomain μ α a → StableToolkit μ α a
(Stable/ToolkitProof.lean), so the final theorems (MainTheorems.lean) assume only (H_α).
No field states a conclusion of a paper lemma; each field is a direct consequence of the
(lattice) local limit theorem, of tightness of S_m / a_m, or of regular variation of a.
Periodic offspring laws #
Periodic laws are not excluded. With d = gcd {i - j : μ_i μ_j > 0} (the span; μ_0 > 0
for critical μ ≠ δ_1, so every step is ≡ -1 (mod d)), S_m ∈ -m + dℤ almost surely and the
lattice local limit theorem (source lines 867–876) reads
sup_{x ∈ -m + dℤ} |a_m Ψ_m(x) - d · p_α(x / a_m)| → 0, where p_α is the density of Y_α.
The stable density is not introduced: LatticeLocal μ a d L records only the three
consequences that the proofs use, with L = d · p_α(0) > 0:
support:Ψ_m(x) ≠ 0 → d ∣ x + m(compatible endpoints);origin:a_n Ψ_n(x) → Luniformly over compatible|x| ≤ η a_n(continuity ofp_αat0andp_α(0) > 0);equicont:|a_n Ψ_n(x) - a_n Ψ_n(y)|is small uniformly over compatiblex, ywith|x - y| ≤ η a_n(uniform continuity ofp_α).
Every uniform statement is restricted to compatible lattice points, so no conditional law at a zero-probability endpoint is ever used.
Consequences proved here (from the fields only) #
StableToolkit.rho_pos,rho_lt_one,tendsto_atTop:0 < 1/α < 1,a_n → ∞.StableToolkit.exists_le_div_of_le_two_mul:Ψ_m(x) ≤ C / a_nwhenevern ≤ 2m.StableToolkit.exists_eventually_le_sub:a_{t-j} ≥ (1 - ε) a_tforj ≤ δ t.StableToolkit.eventually_abs_mul_sub_le,eventually_bounds,eventually_abs_div_sub_one_le: for total lengthsN_n → ∞,m_n = o(N_n)andz_n = o(a_{N_n}),a_{N_n} Ψ_{N_n-j}(x) → LandΨ_{N_n-j}(x) / Ψ_{N_n}(y) → 1uniformly overj ≤ m_nand compatible|x|, |y| ≤ z_n(the "ratio → 1" step of source lines 965, 1033, 1236, 1293, 1752, 2067, 2293, and the lower bounds of lines 1647, 1958, 1981).StableToolkit.exists_lower_bound_neg_one:Ψ_n(-1) ≥ c / a_nfor everyn ≥ 1withΨ_n(-1) > 0, i.e. at every admissible size (Dwass), with one constantc.StableToolkit.eventually_walkProb_neg_one_pos_iff: for largen,Ψ_n(-1) > 0 ↔ d ∣ n - 1(in the aperiodic cased = 1all largenare admissible).StableToolkit.eventually_walkLaw_tail_le: ifr_n / a_{M_n} → ∞thenmax_{i ≤ M_n} P(|S_i| > r_n) → 0(the only use of "maximal tightness", lines 1763–1770, 1912; marginal uniform tightness suffices).isProbabilityMeasure_walkLaw: eachwalkLaw μ mis a probability measure, supplied by the common instances inSetup/Walk.lean.
The lattice local limit theorem, without the stable density (source lines 860–883,
inventory B09). d is the span of the walk (S_m ∈ -m + dℤ a.s.) and L = d · p_α(0) with
p_α the density of Y_α.
support(lines 876–879): outside the lattice-m + dℤthe probability is zero. Used to show that the endpoints met in the proofs are compatible:P(|𝒯| = m) > 0 → d ∣ m - 1(via Dwass),S_M ∈ -M + dℤ, hence0is compatible withn - |𝒯|and-1 - S_Mwithn - Mat admissiblen(lines 965, 1033, 1293, 1752, 2067, 2293).origin(eq:LLplus continuity and positivity ofp_αat0):a_n Ψ_n(x) → Luniformly over compatible|x| ≤ η a_n. Used for every lower boundΨ_n(k) ≥ c / a_n(lines 1034, 1164, 1231, 1329, 1647, 1774, 1981, 2069) and every ratio limitΨ_{n-m}(x) / Ψ_n(-1) → 1(lines 965, 1033, 1236, 1293, 1752, 2067, 2293).equicont(eq:LLplus uniform continuity ofp_α): replaces the Skorokhod/dominated convergence endpoint smoothing in the proof ofeq:approx3(lines 1968–1994, B14); the smoothing becomes a deterministic uniform bound.
Instances For
The random-walk toolkit used by the bridge estimates of Sections 3–5 (source lines
837–883). A temporary conditional interface: it must be derived from StableDomain μ α a.
critical,nondegenerate,alpha_mem: the standing hypotheses(H_α)(lines 705–712), copied fromStableDomainso that bridge lemmas need a single hypothesis.monotone,pos,regularlyVarying(lines 846–853, B06/B08):ais increasing, positive, regularly varying of index1/α. Potter bounds,a_{M_n}/a_n → 0,a_{n-o(n)}/a_n → 1,a_n = o(n),a_n = n^{1/α+o(1)}and Karamata's sums are theorems ofPoissonDeclumping.RegularVariation.*and are not fields. Used at lines 1087–1105, 1145–1177, 1218, 1346–1348, 1752, 1896, 1958, 1986, 2244.sup_le(local bound "following fromeq:LL", B10):Ψ_m(x) ≤ C / a_mfor allm ≥ 1and allx. Used at lines 1034, 1140, 1161, 1176, 1340, 1647, 1774, 1983, 2069, 2254.tight(B07, only in its marginal form):S_m / a_mis tight, uniformly inm ≥ 1. The paper invokes functional convergence (eq:cvlaw) formax_{i ≤ M_n} P(|S_i| > r_n - 1) → 0(lines 1763–1770) and convergence in law ofS_{M_n}/a_{M_n}(line 1912); both only need this. Used througheventually_walkLaw_tail_le.lattice: the lattice local limit theorem, seeLatticeLocal.
- critical : IsCritical μ
- monotone : Monotone a
- regularlyVarying : RegularlyVaryingSeq (1 / α) a
- lattice : ∃ (d : ℕ) (L : ℝ), LatticeLocal μ a d L
Instances For
a_n → ∞.
The local bound at comparable times: Ψ_m(x) ≤ C / a_n whenever n ≤ 2m (lines 1161–1164,
1340, 1647, 1774, 2069: Ψ_{n-q}, Ψ_{n-c}, Ψ_{n-m_n}, Ψ_{n-2M_n} are O(1/a_n)).
Microscopic flatness. Let N n → ∞ be a sequence of total lengths, m_n = o(N_n) and
z_n = o(a_{N_n}). Then a_{N_n} Ψ_{N_n - j}(x) → L uniformly over j ≤ m_n and
lattice-compatible |x| ≤ z_n. (With N n = n: a_n Ψ_{n-j}(x) → L.)
Two-sided local bounds L / (2 a_{N_n}) ≤ Ψ_{N_n - j}(x) ≤ 2L / a_{N_n}, uniformly over
j ≤ m_n (m_n = o(N_n)) and compatible |x| ≤ z_n (z_n = o(a_{N_n})); e.g.
Ψ_n(k) ≥ c / a_n for compatible |k| ≤ z_n (line 1647).
Ratio limit at compatible endpoints. For N_n → ∞, m_n = o(N_n) and
z_n = o(a_{N_n}), Ψ_{N_n - j}(x) / Ψ_{N_n}(y) → 1 uniformly over j ≤ m_n and compatible
|x|, |y| ≤ z_n (the lattice factor d cancels, lines 877–879).
Global lower bound at admissible sizes. One constant c > 0 with
Ψ_n(-1) ≥ c / a_n for every n ≥ 1 such that Ψ_n(-1) > 0 (by Dwass, every admissible
n): lines 1164, 1231, 1329 ("Ψ_n(-1) ≍ 1/a_n", "P(|𝒯| = n) ≍ 1/(n a_n) along admissible
n") and the constant of Corollary cor:pip (line 1653, "for every n ≥ 1").
Admissible sizes on the lattice. For all large n, Ψ_n(-1) > 0 iff d ∣ n - 1. In
the aperiodic case (d = 1) every large n has Ψ_n(-1) > 0, i.e. is admissible
(lines 860, 703).
Uniform tails at small times. If r_n / a_{M_n} → ∞ (e.g. r_n = √(a_{M_n} a_n),
RegularlyVaryingSeq.tendsto_sqrt_div), then max_{i ≤ M_n} P(|S_i| > r_n) → 0. This is the
form in which the paper uses tightness of (S_{⌊M_n t⌋}/a_{M_n}) (lines 1763–1770) and the
convergence in law of S_{M_n}/a_{M_n} (line 1912).