The Kraft–Pratt–Seidenberg five-atom counterexample #
This file formalizes the simple ordering displayed in Section 4 of
Kraft–Pratt–Seidenberg, Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets (1959).
The five atoms p q r s t are represented by 0 1 2 3 4 : Fin 5.
The rank table below is the paper's displayed order, from the empty event through the full event. Its four decisive comparisons are
qs < p, pq < rs, ps < tq, and rt < spq.
The finite de Finetti properties are checked by evaluating all events. The non-representability argument itself is symbolic: finite additivity turns the four strict event comparisons into four incompatible linear inequalities between singleton weights.
The five outcomes in the Kraft--Pratt--Seidenberg example.
Instances For
Events are subsets of the five outcomes.
Equations
Instances For
Outcome p in the notation of the original rank table.
Instances For
Outcome q in the notation of the original rank table.
Instances For
Outcome r in the notation of the original rank table.
Instances For
Outcome s in the notation of the original rank table.
Instances For
Outcome t in the notation of the original rank table.
Instances For
Position in the strict 32-event order printed by KPS.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The weak comparison induced by the original 32-event rank table.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The strict comparison induced by the original 32-event rank table.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The KPS order oriented as “at least as probable”, matching the shared qualitative-probability API.
Equations
Instances For
The table gives distinct ranks to all 32 events.
The empty event is no more likely than every event.
De Finetti's disjoint-union invariance (A). The finite check only concerns inserting one atom; induction gives arbitrary disjoint unions.
Finite additivity determines every event from its singleton values.
Strict numerical representation of the KPS strict order.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
No real finitely additive probability strictly represents the displayed Kraft–Pratt–Seidenberg order.
The exact KPS order satisfies de Finetti's five axioms, with condition
(i) in its original weak form ¬ R ⊥ ⊤.
No shared-API probability weakly represents the exact KPS “at least as probable” order. The contradiction uses the paper's four decisive inequalities.
De Finetti's five axioms are insufficient for finite additive-probability representation.