A finite-tree tail bound for adaptive rank-decreasing processes #
A state may store the entire previous history. At each state, a finite kernel
chooses an outcome and the state updates deterministically. Rank never
increases, and while positive it strictly decreases with probability at least
p. The probability of positive rank after t rounds is bounded using a
killed exponential potential. This yields a coarse exponential tail; it does
not establish the paper's sharper leading constant 2n.
A finite outcome kernel together with a monotone natural-valued rank.
There is no Markov restriction: S can contain the complete history.
- weight : S → Ω → ℝ
Conditional probability of an outcome at the current state.
- next : S → Ω → S
State reached after observing the chosen outcome.
- rank : S → ℕ
Natural-valued obstruction whose disappearance marks success.
Instances For
Total probability assigned to strict progress at the current state.
Instances For
Probability of positive rank after the given number of rounds, defined by the finite probability tree. Each recursive layer is one fresh kernel draw.
Equations
- P.failureProbability 0 x✝ = if P.rank x✝ = 0 then 0 else 1
- P.failureProbability t.succ x✝ = ∑ o : Ω, P.weight x✝ o * P.failureProbability t (P.next x✝ o)
Instances For
Rank zero is absorbing, so positive rank after t rounds is equivalent
to not having reached rank zero earlier.
A per-node strict-progress mass bound gives a one-step contraction of the killed potential, including at the terminal states.
Finite adaptive-tree tail bound. The success assumption is checked at every reachable or unreachable state of the supplied process, so it applies uniformly to states encoding arbitrary previous histories.
A simpler tail bound using only an upper bound on the initial rank.
If each nonterminal state progresses with probability at least one
quarter, failure after t rounds is at most 2^n (7/8)^t.
A concrete confidence budget: 8(n+k) rounds give failure probability
at most 2^(-k) under the quarter-progress hypothesis. This is deliberately
coarser than the paper's sharp geometric-sum estimate.