LocalHolderEstimate #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The local Hölder estimate — [ABK] Theorem C (e.local.Holder.estimate) #
Source: references/algsuperdiff.tex:411-422, under the hypotheses of the
regularity theorem at references/algsuperdiff.tex:371-424.
For a disorder model of strength gamma small enough, every Hölder exponent
alpha ∈ (0, 1 - C √gamma], every scale m and every centre y, there is an
ℕ-valued random variable X with an exponential tail such that, almost
surely, every Dirichlet solution u of the rough-field problem on the cube
y + □_m with force g and zero boundary datum satisfies the normalized
C^{0,alpha} bound
3^{alpha m} [u]_{C^{0,alpha}(y+□_m)} ≤ C 3^{(1-alpha) X}
(‖u - (u)_{y+□_m}‖_{L²(y+□_m)} + σ_m⁻¹ 3^{3m/2} [g]_{C^{0,1/2}(y+□_m)}).
Reading of the statement #
- The minimal scale is existential, not a definition. The regularity theorem
introduces
Xinside its own statement — "there exists anℕ-valued random variable satisfying …" — and the only body it ever receives is supplied inside the proof. The estimate is asserted under the hypotheses of that theorem and refers back to the same random variable, so it is re-introduced here as an existential carrying its tail bound as a conjunct, the shape the regularity theorem of this development already uses. Xisℕ-valued. The source saysℕ-valued, and the value occurs here inside the real prefactor3^{(1-alpha) X}, so theℕ∞-valued form of the regularity theorem is recast; the recast costs nothing, since the tail clause forces the set where the value is infinite to be null and the conclusion is asserted almost surely.- Measurability.
Measurable Xis asserted in addition to the printed conclusion; it is what the later use ofXas a random scale needs. - Almost-sure quantifier.
Xis finite only almost surely, so the estimate is asserted for almost every sample after the choice ofX, a single random variable serving every truncation scaleL ≥ m, every force and every solution. - Truncation scale. The coefficient field is the one cut off at a scale
L ≥ m; the estimate is uniform inL, which is how the proof of the regularity theorem runs and how Section 5.1 reads the result. - The centre. The random variable is bound after
y, so this is the translation-covariant family, oneXfor each triple(alpha, m, y); it is not a strengthening to a singleXuniform in the centre. - Seminorm of the continuous representative. The left side is an infimum
over continuous representatives of
u, whose value is⊤when none exists; the bound therefore also asserts that a continuous representative exists whenever the right side is finite. The cubecubeSetAt y mis open, so this is continuity inside the cube. - Datum class. No hypothesis
g ∈ C^{0,1/2}appears: the conclusion holds trivially when the Hölder seminorm ofgis⊤, both prefactors on the right being strictly positive. - Powers of three. Every power of
3is a real power (Real.rpow), the form carried by the quantities of Section 5.1 that consume the estimate. - Full exponent range. The estimate is asserted for every
alpha ∈ (0, 1 - C √gamma], the printed range, not at one fixed exponent; Section 5.1 uses it atalpha = 1/2.
Conventions #
- Zero boundary datum, seminorm on the full cube. The paper's display is
asserted under the hypotheses of the regularity theorem, hence for every
boundary datum
h ∈ C^{1,1/2}(y + □_m), and measures theC^{0,alpha}seminorm on the inner cubey + □_{m-1}. The formal statement is the zero-datum case, which the paper's statement contains, read on the whole cubey + □_m: the Dirichlet problem here is the zero-datum one, the predicate the quantities of Section 5.1 are defined with and the only case those quantities use. At zero datum the interior cube is not needed. The paper's display carries no boundary-datum term, and the interior restriction is what makes it hold uniformly over the data; the oscillation family of the regularity theorem is already stated on the windows truncated to the cube, at every point of the cube, and the Campanato characterization of Hölder spaces on a cube converts that family into the seminorm up to the boundary. Reading the seminorm on the cube the solution lives on is what Section 5.1 consumes. - The datum seminorm. The paper's datum term is a normalized
W^{1/2,∞}seminorm; that gauge and theC^{0,1/2}seminorm agree up to dimensional constants, so the datum term is rendered asholderSeminormOn … (1/2) gwith no further power of3.
The proof is supplied by the Section 4 provider named in the header import.