InjectionInLInftyV2 #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The injection estimate on a good cube — [ABK] Proposition 5.1 #
Source: references/algsuperdiff.tex:12929-12955 (p.injection.in.L.infty).
For a disorder model of strength gamma small enough there is a constant C
such that, for every accuracy ep ∈ (0, 1/4], every scale n : ℤ, every centre
y and every datum g, on the intersection of the good cube event
goodCubeEvent M Creg n y ep and of the large-scale event
largeScaleEvent M n y (C⁻¹ ep gamma^{-1/2}) the Dirichlet solution u of the
rough-field problem at any scale m ≥ n on the cube y + □_n lies within
C ep 3^{n/2} [g]_{C^{0,1/2}} of the solution v of the comparator problem
with coefficient σ_n I, measured in the normalized L^∞ gauge of the cube,
and u obeys the normalized 1/2-Hölder bound C 3^{n/2} [g]_{C^{0,1/2}}.
Every integer scale #
The estimate is asserted at every n : ℤ, as in the paper, and nothing in it
distinguishes a sign. The cube y + □_n, the annealed gauge σ_n, the good
cube event and the large-scale event are all defined at every integer scale;
every power of 3 that occurs is a real power, hence positive at every
exponent; and the shell law of the model at a scale k is exactly the triadic
rescaling of the shell at scale 0, so a cube at a negative scale is a dilated
copy of a cube at a positive one. The negative scales are needed: the auxiliary
scale that the proof of the main theorem straddles is negative at every time
once the confinement scale is large.
Reading of the statement #
- Essential supremum, and the seminorm of the continuous representative.
The first conclusion measures
u - vbyeLpNorm … ⊤ (volume.restrict (cubeSetAt y n)), the essential supremum of the two Sobolev functions themselves; no representative and no fallback value enters. The second conclusion measures the1/2-Hölder seminorm of a continuous representative ofu, written as an infimum over representatives, whose value is⊤when no such representative exists. The bound therefore also asserts that a continuous representative exists whenever[g]_{C^{0,1/2}}is finite, which is what the printed estimate presupposes. - Powers of three. Every power of
3is a real power (Real.rpow), the form carried by the two quantitieslocalizedErrorandlocalizedRegularitythat define the good cube event. - Constants.
Cmay depend on the dimensiond, on the valuecstarof the model's ellipticity parameterc⋆, and onCreg, that isC = C(d, c⋆, Creg). The single parameterCregstands for the three constants that the source writes separately in the good cube event (C_{e.error},C_{e.reg}and2 C_{e.reg}); enlargingCregenlarges the good cube event, so identifying the three only weakens the statement. - Small-disorder premise. The hypothesis
M.gamma ≤ gamma0is not printed in Proposition 5.1. It is the standing regime in which the constants of the earlier sections are stated, and the annealed-gauge comparison3^{gamma n} σ_{n-1}^{-1} ≤ C c⋆^{-1/2} gamma^{1/2}that the estimate uses holds only there, so it is made explicit here. - Datum class. No hypothesis
g ∈ C^{0,1/2}appears: both conclusions hold trivially whenholderSeminormOn (cubeSetAt y n) (1 / 2) g = ⊤.
Proved; reduces to the standard axioms.