Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Process.Kernel.ResolventTail

ResolventTail #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Displacement tails from resolvent tail decay #

For a divergence-form generator with rough coefficients the estimate an analysis produces is a decay of the RESOLVENT away from the region carrying the datum, not a bound on the transition law. This file turns the first into the second.

The hypothesis is SubMarkovKernelSemigroup.HasResolventTail: at a positive shift lam, the normalized lam-potential measure of the complement of the ball of radius rho about the starting point is at most phi (sqrt lam * rho), with sqrt lam * rho the parabolic scaling of the radius. The conclusion (PositiveC0ContractiveResolvent.measure_compl_ball_le_of_hasResolventTail) is that at the time t = 1 / lam the transition law leaves the ball of radius 4 r with probability at most 2 * exp 1 * phi (sqrt lam * r).

The proof is the excessive-function comparison of Blumenthal--Getoor. Let g be a radial cutoff vanishing on the ball of radius r and equal to one outside the ball of radius 2 r, transported to the one-point compactification by the value one at the added point, so that it becomes an observable vanishing at infinity there. Then v = 2 lam R_lam g is lam-excessive (PositiveC0ContractiveResolvent.mul_operator_smul_operator_le), so the exponential comparison of Semigroup/ExponentialComparison.lean bounds the transition average of any observable below v by exp 1 times v at the starting point. Tail decay at radius r about a point at distance at least 3 r makes v at least one there, and tail decay at radius r about the starting point, together with conservativity, makes v at the starting point at most 2 phi (sqrt lam * r).

The state space is a proper metric space, so that the radial cutoffs have compact support; both a compact state space and a Euclidean one are covered. No analytic estimate for a particular generator is asserted here: the tail decay is the consumer's hypothesis.

noncomputable def Algsuperdiff.Process.radialCutoff {X : Type u_1} [MetricSpace X] (x : X) (a b : ℝ) (z : X) :

The radial cutoff about x: one on the closed ball of radius a, zero outside the ball of radius b, and affine in the distance in between.

Equations
Instances For
    theorem Algsuperdiff.Process.radialCutoff_nonneg {X : Type u_1} [MetricSpace X] (x : X) (a b : ℝ) (z : X) :
    0 ≤ radialCutoff x a b z

    The radial cutoff is nonnegative.

    theorem Algsuperdiff.Process.radialCutoff_le_one {X : Type u_1} [MetricSpace X] (x : X) (a b : ℝ) (z : X) :
    radialCutoff x a b z ≤ 1

    The radial cutoff is at most one.

    theorem Algsuperdiff.Process.radialCutoff_eq_one {X : Type u_1} [MetricSpace X] {x : X} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) {z : X} (hz : dist z x ≤ a) :
    radialCutoff x a b z = 1

    The radial cutoff is one on the inner ball.

    theorem Algsuperdiff.Process.radialCutoff_eq_zero {X : Type u_1} [MetricSpace X] {x : X} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) {z : X} (hz : b ≤ dist z x) :
    radialCutoff x a b z = 0

    The radial cutoff vanishes outside the outer ball.

    The radial cutoff is continuous.

    noncomputable def Algsuperdiff.Process.radialCutoffC0 {X : Type u_1} [MetricSpace X] [ProperSpace X] (x : X) (a b : ℝ) (hab : a < b) :

    The radial cutoff as a continuous function vanishing at infinity.

    Equations
    Instances For
      @[simp]
      theorem Algsuperdiff.Process.radialCutoffC0_apply {X : Type u_1} [MetricSpace X] [ProperSpace X] (x : X) (a b : ℝ) (hab : a < b) (z : X) :
      (radialCutoffC0 x a b hab) z = radialCutoff x a b z

      The bundled radial cutoff has the values of the radial cutoff.

      Resolvent tail decay at a positive shift lam, with profile phi: at every starting point the normalized lam-potential measure of the complement of a ball centred there is at most phi evaluated at the natural scaling sqrt lam * rho of the radius.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        theorem Algsuperdiff.Process.PositiveC0ContractiveResolvent.mul_operator_smul_operator_le {Y : Type u_1} [TopologicalSpace Y] (R : MarkovProcess.PositiveC0ContractiveResolvent Y) (mu : ↑MarkovProcess.Semigroup.PositiveShift) {g : ZeroAtInftyContinuousMap Y ℝ} (hg : ∀ (z : Y), 0 ≤ g z) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (nu : ↑MarkovProcess.Semigroup.PositiveShift) (hnu : ↑mu < ↑nu) (z : Y) :
        ↑nu * ((R.operator nu) (c • (R.operator mu) g)) z ≤ ↑nu / (↑nu - ↑mu) * (c • (R.operator mu) g) z

        Resolvent values are excessive. A nonnegative multiple of the resolvent of a nonnegative observable satisfies, at every larger shift, the pointwise supersolution estimate consumed by generatedSemigroup_apply_le_exp_mul, with the smaller shift as the exponential rate.

        theorem Algsuperdiff.Process.PositiveC0ContractiveResolvent.mul_operator_le_of_hasResolventTail {X : Type u_1} [MetricSpace X] [ProperSpace X] [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] (R : MarkovProcess.PositiveC0ContractiveResolvent X) {phi : ℝ → ℝ} (hphi : ∀ (s : ℝ), 0 ≤ phi s) {mu : ↑MarkovProcess.Semigroup.PositiveShift} (htail : SubMarkovKernelSemigroup.HasResolventTail R.kernelSemigroup (↑mu) phi) {psi : ZeroAtInftyContinuousMap X ℝ} (hpsi0 : ∀ (z : X), 0 ≤ psi z) (hpsi1 : ∀ (z : X), psi z ≤ 1) (y : X) {rho : ℝ} (hrho : 0 < rho) (hvanish : ∀ (z : X), dist z y < rho → psi z = 0) :
        ↑mu * ((R.operator mu) psi) y ≤ phi (√↑mu * rho)

        Tail decay of the potential measure bounds the normalized resolvent of any observable vanishing at infinity which is at most one and vanishes on the ball.

        Displacement tails from resolvent tail decay. Let the sub-Markov kernel semigroup represented by a positive C₀-contractive resolvent be conservative, and let its mu-potential measures have the tail decay phi in the sense of HasResolventTail. Then at the time t = 1 / mu the transition law started at x leaves the ball of radius 4 * r about x with probability at most 2 * exp 1 * phi (sqrt mu * r).

        The proof compares the transition law with the excessive function 2 mu R_mu g, where g is a radial cutoff vanishing on the ball of radius r and equal to one outside the ball of radius 2 r, extended to the one-point compactification by the value one. Conservativity enters once, to turn the tail bound at the starting point into a lower bound for the resolvent of the complementary cutoff.