Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section24.Sensitivity.Provider.DhBound.Assembly.BesovPairing

BesovPairing #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Besov pairing against a response gradient #

Source: ABK26 (e.sensitivity.basic.split1 and e.split.besov.stuff.begin). Both terms of the D_h split are estimated by the same mechanism: |⨍_Q F · H| ≤ C ‖H‖_{B^{3/8}_{2,2}(Q)} ‖F‖_{B^{-3/8}_{2,2}(Q)},

applied with F = ∇v and then combined with the coarse Poincaré inequality ‖∇v‖_{B^{-3/8}_{2,2}} ≤ C λ_{3/8,2}^{-1/2} J^{1/2}.

This module packages that combination once and for all: given any second factor H with a positive-Besov budget B, the averaged pairing against the gradient of a response maximizer is bounded by C(d) · B · λ^{-1/2} · J^{1/2}.

Term A of the source proof is this lemma with H x = hᵀ(x) p; Term BC is this lemma with H x = (w + w* + ℓ_p)(x) (∇·h)(x).

Everything is stated at an arbitrary triadic cube Q and an arbitrary CoarseGraining coefficient family F, as required by the descendant-cube consumers.

Average bridges #

Transporting the coarse Poincaré bound to the duality hypothesis #

The pairing estimate #

Besov pairing against a response gradient.

For every field H with positive Besov budget B at smoothness 3/8, |⨍_Q ∇v · H| ≤ (1 + d 3^{d+1}) · (2 c_{3/8,2}^{-1/2}) · B · λ_{3/8,2}^{-1/2} · J^{1/2},

where v is any response maximizer for (a, p, q) on Q.

This is the common engine of e.sensitivity.basic.split1 (Term A) and e.split.besov.stuff.begin (Term BC). The positive Besov budget B is the only input not proved here.