ScaleSummation #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The scale summation of p.cg.ellipticity.bounds, in the payload's shape #
ABK26's proof of p.cg.ellipticity.bounds from p.bfA.multiscalebound has
exactly two moves after the block estimate:
- "which implies, after summing over
n" --- the passage from the per-scale display `max_z |b_m(z+cu_n)| shom^{-1} <= C + O_{Gamma_1}(A_1(n))- O_{Gamma_sigma'}(A_2(n))
to the display forLambda_{s,q}(cu_m; a_m) shom^{-1}` itself.
- O_{Gamma_sigma'}(A_2(n))
This module supplies the weighted countable step of move 2, the ingredient
behind the three-slot shape that
Provider/CoarseEllipticity/UpperLeg.lean's payload binder consumes: a
pointwise domination X <= Udet + U1 + Uexp with Udet bounded by a constant,
U1 and Uexp measurable, and each of the two carrying its own Gamma tail.
What "summing over n" is, formally #
The source's summation is: an on-grid bound of the target by a weighted series
of the per-scale grid maxima,
X <= sum_k w_k G_k, together with a per-scale three-way split
G_k <= Cdet + U1_k + Uexp_k. Since the weights are nonnegative with total
mass at most Wtot, the deterministic part contributes Cdet * Wtot and the
two random parts contribute the weighted countable sums
sum_k w_k U1_k and sum_k w_k Uexp_k, each priced by the countable
Gamma_sigma triangle inequality l.Gamma.sigma.triangle
(Provider/Orlicz/TsumTriangle.lean) at
gammaTriangleConst sigma * sum_k w_k a_k.
That is the whole content of the source's one-line "after summing over n"; its
weighted countable step is isBigOWith_gammaSigma_tsum_weighted. The
arithmetic of the resulting amplitudes --- turning sum_k w_k a_k into the
printed C s gamma (2s - gamma)^{-3} --- is the caller's, and is supplied by
GridWeights.lean's polyGridWeight_tsum_le, gridWeight_mul_rpow and
one_sub_rpow_neg_inv_le.
Main results #
isBigOWith_gammaSigma_tsum_weighted--- the weighted countableGamma_sigmatriangle inequality.
What this module does NOT claim #
At this repository's carrier that is the statement that
Observable.cutoffUpperEllipticity is dominated by a weighted series of grid
maxima of |b| --- the off-grid/on-grid LambdaSq bridge. CoarseGraining
supplies the deterministic half of that bridge at q = 1
(Ch02.LambdaSq_finite_one_le_tsum_weighted_maxDescendantBMatrixNormAtScale,
Ch04.LambdaSqCoeffField_finite_one_le_tsum_weighted_maxDescendantBMatrixNormAtScale);
the passage from there to the measurable representative
Observable.cutoffUpperEllipticity is only almost everywhere, and no theorem
here or anywhere in this repository closes that gap.
References #
- ABK26,
p.cg.ellipticity.bounds, proof fromp.bfA.multiscalebound, (the two "after summing overn" steps). - ABK26,
l.Gamma.sigma.triangle.
The weighted form of l.Gamma.sigma.triangle: a nonnegative family with
individual Gamma_sigma scales, summed against nonnegative weights, is
Gamma_sigma at gammaTriangleConst sigma times the weighted scale series.