LocalizationOscillationDisplay #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
e.lower.bound.oscillations at the fresh-shell correctors #
Source displays in ABK26:
e.lower.bound.oscillations(label;\begin{multline},\end{multline}; the printed chain occupies),e.nablaw.oscillations(label; display),e.recurrence.params(label), which fixesnandK,e.def.w(label), which defines the two finite-volume correctors.
ABK26 asserts, for w either of the two correctors of e.def.w,
( avsum_{z in 3^n Zd cap cu_K} E[ ‖grad w - (grad w)_{z+cu_n}‖^4_{L2bar(z+cu_n)} ] )^{1/4}
+ shom_{m-h}^{-1} 3^n E[ ‖grad(k_m - k_{m-h})‖^4_{Linf(cu_{m-h})} ]^{1/4}
<= C 3^{-(m-h-n)}
+ C shom_{m-h}^{-1} 3^{-(m-h-n)} 3^{gamma(m-h)} gamma^{-1}
+ C 3^{-(K-m+h)/4}
<= gamma^{15} .
This module assembles the first inequality at the manuscript's own carriers: the
actual finite-volume Dirichlet and Neumann correctors on cu_K, the actual
fresh-shell forcing, the actual triadic meso grid of scale n = m - h - N, and
the actual shell-derivative gauge of e.nabla.km.kn.infty.
The three consumed ingredients #
- the per-site estimate
e.nablaw.oscillationsat the genuine carriers,Corrector.exists_freshShellDirichlet_gradient_oscillation_interior_mesh_localGaugeand its Neumann mirror (moduleOscillationAssemblyShell); - the fourth moment of the forcing gauge,
integral_shellDerivNormSum_rpow_four_leandmul_shellDerivNormSum_momentRoot_four_le_gap(moduleLocalizationOscillationTail); - the grid functional and its two-term majorant step,
gridFourthMomentRoot_le_add_of_le(moduleLocalizationOscillationGridMoment), on the interior gridinteriorMesoCubeGridofLocalizationGrid.
What is proved #
meshOscillationCell,meshEnergyCell-- the two per-cube quantities of the display, based at the cube's own sitetriadicCubeShift R.openCubeAtScale_subset_of_mem_interiorMesoCubeGrid-- membership in the interior grid at outer scalen + N - 1is exactly the containmentz + cu_{n+N} subset cu_Kthate.nablaw.oscillationsneeds.integrable_shellDerivNormSum_rpow_four,gridFourthMoment_shellDerivNormSum_le-- the forcing gauge is fourth-power integrable and its grid fourth moment obeys the uniform shell bound.exists_freshShellDirichlet_gradient_oscillation_lower_bound_displayandexists_freshShellNeumann_gradient_oscillation_lower_bound_display-- the display itself, at the two correctors.
Declared divergences from the printed statement #
- The grid is the interior grid. The manuscript averages over the
unrestricted mesh
3^n Zd cap cu_Kwhile the preceding per-site estimate holds only wherez + cu_{m-h} subset cu_K. Averaging only over the interior mesh is the route taken here: the grid below isinteriorMesoCubeGrid d K n (n + N - 1). Consequently the printed third termC 3^{-(K-m+h)/4}does not appear: there is no boundary contribution to bound. - The printed boundary exponent is unreachable anyway. The quarter
exponent
3^{-(K-m+h)/4}follows only from a uniform-in-window annealed fourth moment that is not available, and the globalL^8envelope gives at best3^{-(K-m+h)/8}. Nothing below asserts either exponent. - The gap restriction
d + 3 <= N. The per-site estimate is the birth-scale telescope, not the false adjacent-cube1/3-contraction; its coarse leg needs a gap of at leastd + 3scales. The restriction is inherited verbatim and appears as an explicit hypothesis. - The forcing amplitude is sharper than printed. The printed second term
carries
gamma^{-1}; the bound below carries the number of telescope scalesN = m - h - non the oscillation leg and no factor at all on the standalone leg, with the absolute constantshellDerivGammaFourthConstof the classGamma_2. In the regime ofe.recurrence.paramsone hasN <= 2 gamma^{-1}(recurrenceGap_le_two_mul_inv, moduleLocalizationParams, under its coverage gate), so the bound below implies the printed one up to the absolute factor2; nothing is weakened to match the printed form. - The forcing random variable is the dominating gauge, not the
L^inftynorm. Both on the left of the display and inside the per-site estimate, the manuscript's‖grad(k_m - k_{m-h})‖_{Linf(z + cu_{m-h})}is replaced by the summed first-derivative shell gaugeshellDerivNormSum, which dominates it by the triangle inequality over the shells with no loss (see the carrier note ofLocalizationOscillationTail). The statements below therefore imply the printed ones and are stronger. The standalone left-hand term is moreover stated at an arbitrary base pointz0, of which the manuscript's untranslatedcu_{m-h}is one instance. - The triangle step costs
8^{1/4}. The manuscript's implicit Minkowski inequality inL^4(counting x P)has constant1; the elementary route used here has the absolute constant8^{1/4}, written out inoscillationDisplayConstand absorbed by the manuscript's dimension-onlyC. - The visible
sqrt dand the explicitsigmaInv. The carrierVec dis sup-normed while the shell gauge is Euclidean, so the forcing amplitude readssigmaInv * sqrt d * |e|_2; the manuscript'sCis dimension-only and absorbs thesqrt d. The manuscript'sshom_{m-h}^{-1}is the free nonnegative parametersigmaInvhere; no value is assumed for it. - None of the three is assumed or asserted below.
What is not proved here #
The meso-window energy average hcoarse is NOT discharged here. The
manuscript writes "by e.nablaw.in.L.eight", which controls the single global
normalized L^8 norm of grad w on cu_K. Passing from that to
avsum_{z} E[ ‖grad w‖^4_{L2bar(z + cu_{m-h})} ] requires a bounded-overlap
count: the windows z + cu_{m-h} indexed by the scale-n grid overlap, each
point of cu_K lying in 3^{d(m-h-n)} of them, so the tiling identity
cubeAverage_originCube_eq_mesoGridAverage of LocalizationGrid -- which is a
partition statement -- does not apply. The correct multiplicity is 3^{dN} and
makes the constant 1, but no covering lemma at ratio 3^N is available in this
repository; LocalizationGrid's transfer is at ratio 3 only. The binder
hcoarse therefore carries the whole passage, visibly, at every instantiation
site.
The two per-cube quantities of the display #
The left-hand side of e.nablaw.oscillations at the cube R, based at the
cube's own site: ‖grad w - (grad w)_{z + cu_n}‖_{L2bar(z + cu_n)}.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The coarse energy on the outer window of e.nablaw.oscillations:
‖grad w‖_{L2bar(z + cu_{m-h})}.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The interior grid supplies the containment of e.nablaw.oscillations #
Membership in the interior grid at outer scale n + N - 1 is the containment
z + cu_{n+N} ⊆ cu_K printed.
The forcing gauge: integrability and the grid moment #
The forcing gauge of e.nablaw.oscillations is fourth-power integrable. Same
route as integral_shellDerivNormSum_rpow_four_le: the weak-Orlicz tail
e.nabla.km.kn.infty at the translated cube, through CoarseGraining's
layer-cake bound.
The grid fourth moment of the forcing gauge. The per-site bound of
integral_shellDerivNormSum_rpow_four_le is uniform in the base point, so it
survives the grid average unchanged.
The constant of the display #
The absolute constant of the display: the 8^{1/4} of the elementary
triangle step, the dimension-only constant C of e.nablaw.oscillations, and
the Gamma_2 fourth-moment constant of the forcing gauge, combined so that a
single constant dominates all three terms.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The core assembly #
The display at the two correctors #
e.lower.bound.oscillations for the Dirichlet corrector of e.def.w, on the
interior meso grid.
The second printed term is proved in the sharper form carrying N = m - h - n
instead of gamma^{-1}.
Conditional A. The caller supplies hd : 0 < d, the telescope gap `hN: d
- 3 ≤ N
, the nonempty shell rangehlt: n + N < highScale,hsigma: 0 ≤ sigmaInvforshom_{m-h}^{-1}, the weak-solution propertyhwDofe.def.wat every sample, and the two propositionshcoarse,hcoarseIntabout the meso-window corrector energies.hcoarseis the manuscript's "by`e.nablaw.in.L.eight`" step and is not discharged here; see the module's open obstruction.
e.lower.bound.oscillations for the Neumann corrector of e.def.w, on the
interior meso grid. The Neumann mirror of the previous statement; the
manuscript's "the same results are valid for w_{N,e'}^{(K)}".
Conditional A. The binders are those of the Dirichlet leg, with hwN the
mean-zero Neumann weak-solution property in place of the zero-trace one.