Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Diffusivity.ApproximateRecurrence.LocalizationSelectionVariation

LocalizationSelectionVariation #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Provider: the first variation of the field-slope localization minimizer #

Source displays in ABK26:

This module joins the existence layer of LocalizationSelectionExistence.lean to the cell algebra of LocalizationBasicSplit.lean: it turns the minimality of the field-slope minimizers into the Euler--Lagrange property that the cell algebra consumes.

What is proved #

Divergences from the printed statement #

Sums of test fields #

The constant-slope special case #

The predicate-level companion of X_z = S_z + tilde S_z. A constant-load admissible field plus a field-slope admissible field is admissible for the shifted slope field. At the manuscript's carriers, S_z is admissible at the constant load P_z (e.Pz.def), tilde S_z is admissible for bfF_z (e.Fz.def), and the shifted slope field constantDoubledField P_z + bfF_z is exactly the background of the X_z display.

Ambient membership of a competitor #

A competitor over an ambient slope field is itself ambient, i.e. lies in Lpot(U) x Lsol(U). Both halves are the corresponding closure of the Chapter-1 field spaces under adding a zero-trace element.

The first variation #

The first variation of the field-slope minimizer. A minimizer of the doubled energy over the affine class F + (L^2_{pot,0} x Lsolo)(U) is a doubled response field on U, i.e. it satisfies the Euler--Lagrange equation against every test field.

At the manuscript's carriers this is the property of tilde S_z that LocalizationBasicSplit.volumeAverage_doubledBlockPairingIntegrand_of_isDoubledResponseField consumes for the cross-term collapse of e.lower.bound.basic.split, the third line of that display it is also the correct justification of the identity.

The energy comparison #

ABK26's variation display, with the justification. For a field-slope minimizer X over the slope field F,

fint_U X . bfA_m X = fint_U F . bfA_m X .

The manuscript justifies this by "since bfF_z has mean zero in z+cu_n"; mean-zeroness is used nowhere below. The identity is the Euler--Lagrange equation of X tested against the test field X - F. Mean-zeroness alone does not place tilde S_z in the class; membership needs the gradient/solenoidal structure and integrability of bfF_z, which the actual-carrier consumer must derive.