PrincipalResponseDisplayTwo #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
Binder descriptions below are an informal inventory only, NOT a source certification; certification vocabulary is reserved for frozen source-facing declarations.
Provider: display 2 of leg (iv) of the principal response #
Source display in ABK26, inside Step 3 of the proof of
l.approximate.recurrence.formula (label):
( avsum_{z in 3^n Zd cap cu_K} E[ | bfAhom_{m-1}^{1/2} P_z |^4 ] )^{1/4} <= C .
What is assembled here #
The chain has six links, five of which are supplied by the modules imported above and by the two proved engines:
- the collapse of the normalization (
annealedSqrtNormSq_principalPz_eq, fromellipticityBudget_eq) and the gauge transport toshom_{m-1}(sq_annealedSqrtNormSq_le_gaugeRatio_sq_mul), which together reduce the integrand to the raw averaged slope pair times the squared gauge ratio; - the vector Jensen inequality at the fourth power and the
L^4 <= L^8bridge on each localization cube (portable moduleCubeJensenVec); - the grid re-assembly to a single global
L^8norm oncu_K(descendantsAverage_sq_vecNormSq_add_cubeAverageVec_le); e.nablaw.in.L.eightfor the two corrector gradients, ande.km.kn.Lpatp = 8for the extra forcingshom^{-1} h e'carried by the Neumann slot ofe.Pz.def, merged into a singleGamma_1lane byisBigOWith_gammaSigma_one_add;- the transport of that lane from the canonical shell law to the
cutoff-sample law (
isBigOWith_cutoffSampleLaw_of_isBigOWith); and - the expectation (
integral_le_of_le_shift_add_kappa_sq, which runs the provedintegral_rpow_two_le_of_shift_add_one_orlicz) and the fourth root.
The gauge factor is displayed, not absorbed #
The manuscript writes the display at the gauge shom_{m-1}, while P_z is
built at shom_{m-h}. The bound below therefore carries the explicit factor
(gaugeRatio shom_{m-h} shom_{m-1})^{1/2}. It is not absorbed into C: the
three scale gates that this theorem binds do not control shom_{m-1} (they
constrain scales at most m0 >= m - h only), so the manuscript's remark that
e.shom.h.bounds makes the ratio dimensional is an input this theorem does not
have and does not silently assume. This is the same convention as the proved
PrincipalResponseMomentsFourth, which names the ratio and does not bound it.
The two analytic binders #
hmeasX is the measurability of the display's own integrand: the manuscript
writes E[...], which presupposes that the bracket is a random variable. It is
a well-definedness condition, not a step of the estimate; no bound and no
conclusion of any predecessor is assumed. The two solution binders hwD,
hwN are the manuscript's own definitions e.def.w of the two correctors, one
per sample.
References #
- ABK26, display, inside
l.approximate.recurrence.formula;e.Pz.def;e.def.w(label; the provedFreshShellL8cites, which is a citation drift, not a statement drift);e.recurrence.params;e.nablaw.in.L.eight;e.km.kn.Lp.
The pathwise grid bound #
The pathwise grid form of display 2. Combining the collapse of the
normalization, the gauge transport, the vector Jensen inequality at the fourth
power, the grid re-assembly and the L^4 <= L^8 bridge:
avsum_R | bfAhom_{sigmaTop}^{1/2} P_R |^4
<= 16 rho^2 ( |e'|^4 + |e|^4 )
+ 16 rho^2 ( ‖grad w_D‖^2 + 2‖grad w_N‖^2 + 2‖shom^{-1} h e'‖^2 )^2 ,
with rho = gaugeRatio sigmaLow sigmaTop and every norm the volume-normalized
Euclidean L^8 norm on Q.
Display 2 of leg (iv) #
Display 2 of leg (iv) of l.approximate.recurrence.formula.
E[ avsum_R | bfAhom_{sigmaTop}^{1/2} P_R |^4 ]^{1/4}
<= ( gaugeRatio shom_{m-h} sigmaTop )^{1/2} * C ,
with R running over the triadic descendants of cu_K at depth j and P_R
the localized load of e.Pz.def. At the manuscript's reading gauge
sigmaTop = shom_{m-1} the displayed factor is the ratio the manuscript absorbs
into C by e.shom.h.bounds; it is left visible here because the gates bound
above do not constrain the scale m - 1.
The expectation stands outermost, which is the pathwise-then-integrate reading;
the manuscript's own order avsum_[...] follows from it by the finite
linearity of the grid average whenever the individual expectations exist.