SubLandmarkDisplays #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
Binder descriptions below are an informal inventory only, NOT a source certification; certification vocabulary is reserved for frozen source-facing declarations.
The recurrence binders below the base landmark, from the base-case plateau #
The seam #
l.approximate.recurrence.formula (ABK26) supplies its two displays
e.what.do.we.have only on the range m** <= n <= m_0 - h, whereas its
consumer l.integrate.approx.recurrence assumes
e.assump.upper/e.assump.lower.modified at every pair n <= m <= m_0 with
m <= n + c_star gamma^{-1}. bridges the two by bare citation.
This file pays that debt. It proves that on the uncovered range the two
binders are consequences of the base-case plateau alone, and then re-derives
the full conclusion of integrate_approx_recurrence_cstarPlus from an
m**-floored recurrence family. No second integration engine is introduced:
the headline theorem's proof is a call to the proved
integrate_approx_recurrence_cstarPlus.
Why the uncovered range is small #
The consumer's own admissible-scale restriction is (m: real) <= (n: real) + c_star gamma^{-1}. Hence for an uncovered pair (n < m**) one has m < m** + c_star gamma^{-1}, so both endpoints lie within c_star gamma^{-1} scales
of m**. The landmark m** is defined by the gamma^{-3} threshold nu^2 >= 2 (log 3) c+ gamma^{-3} 3^{2 gamma m}, three powers of gamma below the m*
threshold, and gamma (m - n) <= c_star <= 3/2 on the admissible range costs
only the absolute factor 3^{2 c_star} <= 81. The plateau envelope
e.small.scale.bound/e.plateau.region.bound therefore still pins the
sequence at nu to relative accuracy O(gamma^2) at both endpoints, while
the recurrence increment A_{n,m} is itself O(nu^2 gamma^2). Every term
that the two displays are meant to track is thus dominated by the single slack
term E gamma of the binders, and both binders hold with room to spare.
This is exactly the "vacuously-easily on the base-case plateau" reading
suggested but never carried out. Note that it is the consumer's narrow shell
budget c_star gamma^{-1} that makes it work; the argument below does not
cover the source lemma's wider h <= 6 c_star gamma^{-1}, which is not needed
here.
Main results #
recurrence_binders_of_below_landmark: at a single pair(n, m)whose lower endpoint meets them**threshold, the plateau envelope alone gives bothe.assump.upperande.assump.lower.modified.integrate_approx_recurrence_of_landmark_floored: the conclusione.concl.root.gamma.invofl.integrate.approx.recurrence, from a recurrence family that is supplied only formss <= n.sigmaBar_integrate_approx_recurrence_of_mStarStar_floored: the same, at the genuine running diffusivityAnnealed.sigmaBar, the genuine constantsDisorder.cstar/Disorder.cstarPlus, and the genuine landmarkSection3.mStarStar.
What is NOT claimed #
l.approximate.recurrence.formula is not proved here and nothing in this file
asserts it; the hupper/hlower families of the headline theorems remain
disclosed hypotheses. What is proved is that those families no longer need to
be assumed below m**. No node is claimed closed.
References #
- ABK26,
e.mstarstarande.mstar. - ABK26,
p.base.case;e.plateau.region.bound. - ABK26,
l.approximate.recurrence.formula. - ABK26,
l.integrate.approx.recurrence; the citation.
Scalar algebra #
The three lemmas of this section are pure real algebra: no rpow, exp or
log occurs in their statements, so the nonlinear arithmetic used to prove
them never meets a transcendental atom.
The two binders below the landmark #
The uncovered range of the recurrence, discharged from the base-case plateau.
Let s satisfy the all-scale envelope e.small.scale.bound, which
p.base.case supplies unconditionally for the genuine diffusivity
(e.plateau.region.bound). Let (n, m) be admissible for
l.integrate.approx.recurrence, i.e. n ≤ m and (m: ℝ) ≤ (n: ℝ) + c_star gamma⁻¹, and suppose the lower endpoint n meets the defining threshold of
m** (e.mstarstar): 3 ^ (2 gamma n) ≤ nu ^ 2 gamma ^ 3 / (2 (log 3) c+).
Then both binders of l.integrate.approx.recurrence hold at (n, m), for any
E ≥ 1 and any F ≥ 0. The approximate recurrence formula is not used.
The proof is quantitative: on this range s_n ≤ (1 + gamma²/2) nu,
s_m ≤ (1 + 81 gamma²/2) nu and A_{n,m} ≤ (243/4) nu² gamma², all three
O(gamma^2), while the binders' slack is E gamma ≥ gamma.
The integration lemma from a floored recurrence family #
l.integrate.approx.recurrence from an m**-floored recurrence.
Same conclusion as
Provider.Diffusivity.RecurrenceIntegration.integrate_approx_recurrence_cstarPlus,
but the two recurrence families are only required at pairs whose lower endpoint
lies at or above a scale mss meeting the m** threshold hmss -- which is
precisely the range that l.approximate.recurrence.formula delivers. Below
mss the binders are supplied by recurrence_binders_of_below_landmark from
the plateau envelope hsmall alone.
The gamma ≤ 1/128 smallness needed there is derived from the
gamma-threshold that integrate_approx_recurrence_cstarPlus already imposes;
it is not an extra hypothesis.
There is no second integration engine: the final step is a call to the proved
integrate_approx_recurrence_cstarPlus.
At the genuine diffusivity and the genuine landmark #
c_star ≤ c+ for the genuine constants: J4's directional constant never
exceeds the normalized Frobenius origin mass, because the dimension is at
least two.
The seam, at the genuine carriers.
l.integrate.approx.recurrence for the running diffusivity sigmaBar, from a
recurrence family supplied only on mStarStar M ≤ n -- exactly the range that
l.approximate.recurrence.formula delivers.
The envelope is the proved annealedPlateau_smallScaleBound
(e.plateau.region.bound), the landmark threshold is the proved
Provider.Scales.rpow_mStarStar_le (e.mstarstar), and c_star ≤ 3/2 is the
proved Provider.Disorder.cstar_le_three_halves; none of them is assumed.
This theorem is conditional on hupper/hlower and claims no node status.
Those two families are the conclusion of l.approximate.recurrence.formula,
which this repository does not prove.