Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Diffusivity.Corrector.OscillationMeanSquare

OscillationMeanSquare #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Mean-square oscillation algebra for e.nablaw.oscillations #

The quantity compared in e.nablaw.oscillations is the normalized mean-square gradient oscillation on a cube. CoarseGraining already defines its squared carrier,

  meanSquareDeviationOn V u c    = avg_V (u - c)^2 ,
  meanSquareDeviationVecOn V h c = sum_k meanSquareDeviationOn V (h . k) (c k) ,
  meanSquareOscillationVecOn V h = meanSquareDeviationVecOn V h (avg_V h) ,

in Homogenization.Book.Ch01 (MeanSquareDeviation.lean), but supplies no lemma at all about meanSquareOscillationVecOn: a repository sweep of CoarseGraining finds the definition and no consumer. The three facts proved here are the ones the nested-recentring route consumes at every scale.

References #

The scalar volume-ratio comparison.

Restricting a mean-square deviation from U to a measurable subset V costs exactly the volume ratio |U| / |V|. Note the hypothesis is integrability on the larger set only.

The vector volume-ratio comparison.

The form actually consumed: passing the mean-square gradient deviation from the cube U to a subcube V costs the volume ratio. For one triadic step of the concentric family this ratio is 3^d, whose square root is the factor rho weighting the E (j+1) term in OscillationTelescope.