Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Homogenization.CombineIntegerDownscale

CombineIntegerDownscale #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Step 2 of p.combine.under.S: the squared means-downscale-by-defect estimate #

ABK26, Step 2 of Proposition p.combine.under.S. The step opens by taking the expectation of the coarse-grained identity e.J.coarse.grained and combining it with subadditivity e.subaddJ.nosymm and the vanishing annealed coupling e.annealed.khom.zero to get, for scale indices n <= m and e, e' with |e| = 1,

0 <= shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_n) - shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m)
   = 2 E[ J(cu_n, 0, e; a_L) - J(cu_m, 0, e; a_L) ]
  <= 2 E[ J(cu_n, e', e; a_L) - J(cu_m, e', e; a_L) ]

and then, under the load normalization e.pq.normed, the printed display

0 <= shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_n) - shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m)
  <= 2 shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m) E[ J(cu_n, p, q; a_L) - J(cu_m, p, q; a_L) ] .

The last declaration below states the strictly stronger form obtained by replacing the right-hand gauge shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m) by |q|^{-2} = shom_L^{-1}; see Route.

Scope #

The first group of declarations corresponds to the two mean-propagation displays; these carry no constant and no premise beyond the load normalization.

The second group completes Step 2 with the squared estimate e.means.downscale.by.defect (closed). It consumes the proposition's own one-cube fourth-moment premise e.moment.bound.onmathcalE and the load normalization e.pq.normed as hypotheses, in three steps:

  1. nonnegativity of E[J(cu_m,p,q;a_L)] and the subadditivity chain E[J(cu_n,p,q;a_L)] <= E[J(cu_L,p,q;a_L)] for L <= n;
  2. the one-cube bound E[J(cu_L,p,q;a_L)] <= delta_1, obtained from the first inequality of e.mathcalE.monotone.ordered (in the form of the proved simultaneous directional domination J <= E_{s,infinity,2}^2) and Cauchy--Schwarz E[X^2] <= E[X^4]^{1/2}. The sub-cube discount e.bound.one.cube.by.mathcalE is not used: the observed cube and the coefficient cutoff cube are both cu_L, so its k = m instance is the identity;
  3. squaring against the |q|^{-2} = shom_L^{-1} gauge of the first group.

Because the gauge of step 3 is already shom_L^{-1}, the printed step shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m) <= 2 shom_L^{-1} -- the only place where the moment premise is used a second time -- is not needed, and the universal constant of e.means.downscale.by.defect is delivered as the explicit numeral 4.

Rendering of the moment premise #

The printed premise E[E_{s,infinity,2}(cu_L; a_L, shom_L)^4]^{1/2} <= delta_1 asserts in particular that the fourth moment of a nonnegative observable is finite. Bochner's ∫ returns 0 on a non-integrable function, so the literal transcription Real.sqrt (∫ ...) <= delta_1 would be satisfied vacuously by an infinite moment. The premise is therefore carried in its lower-integral form ∫⁻.ofReal (E^4) <=.ofReal (delta_1 ^ 2), which is exactly E[E^4] <= delta_1^2 for the nonnegative observable and encodes finiteness and the bound in one clause. lintegral_ofReal_le_ofReal_sq_of_sqrt_integral_le converts the Bochner pair (integrability together with the literal Real.sqrt bound) into it.

The observable itself is Observable.cutoffHomogenizationErrorRepresentative M L L hs (Annealed.sigmaBar M L), the proved measurable representative of E_{s,infinity,2}(cu_L; a_L, shom_L): coefficient-cutoff scale L, observed cube cu_L, comparator the genuine running diffusivity shom_L. It is a.e. equal to the literal CoarseGraining expression by Observable.cutoffHomogenizationErrorRaw_ae_eq_representative, so the premise is the same statement as the printed one.

The load normalization is carried as its two printed clauses q = shom_L p and |q|^2 = shom_L; the derivation uses both (the first to identify p, the second to identify |q|^2 and the unit direction).

Route #

The printed derivation of the normalized display uses the coefficient-field homogeneity e.homogeneous.J to move the load (p, q) onto the unit pair (e', e). That rescaling is not available on the CoeffOn/Domain carriers of this repository. It is not needed: the annealed coarse-grained identity is an exact quadratic form in (p, q), so the load enters only through |q|^2 = vecNormSq q and through a second quadratic form in p which is nonnegative by the same subadditivity input. The conclusion below is therefore obtained with the load kept general, and it is strictly stronger than the printed display: the printed right-hand side carries the factor shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m), and |q|^{-2} = shom_L^{-1} <= shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m) by the unconditional Loewner monotonicity and infinite-volume limit of e.homs.defs, not by the moment premise; the moment premise supplies only the opposite half shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m) <= 2 shom_L^{-1}. The printed display is recoverable in this repository from Provider.Diffusivity.ApproximateRecurrence.inv_sigmaBar_le_annealedCubeLowerRight together with Provider.Annealed.coefficientCutoffLaw_exists_annealedBlockMatrixAtScale_eq_blockDiag_smul_one.

The e.homogeneous.J bypass now covers the squaring step as well, and there too no rescaling is performed. The printed proof invokes homogeneity to put the load in the normalized form the one-cube input expects; but shom_L is a positive scalar, so e.pq.normed already presents the load in that form: exists_unit_loads_of_pq_normed certifies that q = shom_L p together with |q|^2 = shom_L forces (p, q) = (shom_L^{-1/2} e, shom_L^{1/2} e) for the unit vector e = shom_L^{-1/2} q. The identification is an equality of loads, not a rescaling of the coefficient field, so the whole file is free of e.homogeneous.J.

Inputs #

Main results #

annealedInverseScalar_scaledDefect_le_responseDefect * annealedInverseScalar_defect_le_responseDefect

The scalar shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_n) of ABK26 Step 2: the annealed inverse-star block of the genuine coefficient cutoff on the origin cube at integer scale n is a scalar matrix, and this is its scalar.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    ABK26 e.J.coarse.grained in the mean, with e.annealed.khom.zero. The expected response of the genuine coefficient cutoff on the origin cube at any integer scale n is the block-diagonal quadratic form

    E[J(cu_n, p, q; a_L)] = 1/2 q. shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_n) q - p. q + 1/2 p. bhom_L(cu_n) p.

    The mixed block is absent because the annealed coupling of the cutoff law vanishes; the integrability side condition of the expectation identity is discharged from the proved cutoff moment layer, not assumed.

    Nonnegativity of the mean defect at every integer scale. This is the left-hand inequality of the ABK26 Step-2 display: the annealed inverse-star scalar of the cutoff is nonincreasing along the integer cube scales.

    ABK26 Step 2 with a general load. For every integer pair of cube scales n <= m and every load (p, q),

    (shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_n) - shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m)) |q|^2 <= 2 E[J(cu_n, p, q; a_L) - J(cu_m, p, q; a_L)].

    This is the load-general form of the printed display: no rescaling of the load directions is needed, because the annealed coarse-grained identity is exact.

    ABK26 Step 2, normalized display. Under the load normalization e.pq.normed the squared norm |q|^2 = shom_L is positive, and the mean defect obeys

    0 <= shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_n) - shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m) <= 2 |q|^{-2} E[J(cu_n, p, q; a_L) - J(cu_m, p, q; a_L)]

    for every integer pair of cube scales n <= m.

    Step 2, part (i): sign and monotonicity of the mean response #

    The two facts the squaring step needs about the mean response itself: it is nonnegative at every scale (e.Jenergyv.nosymm, in the mean), and it is nonincreasing along the integer cube scales (e.subaddJ.nosymm).

    Nonnegativity of the mean response. The response functional is pointwise nonnegative, hence so is its expectation, at every integer cube scale and every load.

    The subadditivity chain of ABK26 Step 2. The mean response of the genuine coefficient cutoff is nonincreasing in the cube scale, at every pair of integer scales n <= k and every load. Applied at n = L this is the inequality E[J(cu_n,p,q;a_L)] <= E[J(cu_L,p,q;a_L)] for L <= n.

    Step 2, part (ii): the one-cube bound under the moment premise #

    The one-cube bound. Under the proposition's fourth-moment premise e.moment.bound.onmathcalE and the load normalization e.pq.normed, the mean response of the genuine coefficient cutoff on its own cube obeys

    E[J(cu_L, p, q; a_L)] <= delta_1.

    The route is the first inequality of e.mathcalE.monotone.ordered at the cutoff cube -- the a.e. domination J(cu_L, shom_L^{-1/2} e, shom_L^{1/2} e; a_L) <= E_{s,infinity,2}(cu_L; a_L, shom_L)^2 in every unit direction -- followed by Cauchy--Schwarz. The universal constant of the printed bound is therefore 1 here.

    Step 2, part (iii): the squared means-downscale-by-defect display #

    ABK26 e.means.downscale.by.defect (closed). Under the proposition's fourth-moment premise e.moment.bound.onmathcalE with delta_1 in (0, 1/2] and the load normalization e.pq.normed, for all integer cube scales L <= n <= m,

    |shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m) - shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_n)|^2 <= 4 shom_L^{-2} delta_1^2.

    The universal constant is the explicit numeral 4. The proof chains the normalized propagation display above (whose gauge is already |q|^{-2} = shom_L^{-1}) with E[J(cu_m,p,q;a_L)] >= 0, the subadditivity chain E[J(cu_n,p,q;a_L)] <= E[J(cu_L,p,q;a_L)] at L <= n, and the one-cube bound; the printed step shom_{L,*}^{-1}(cu_m) <= 2 shom_L^{-1} is not used.