Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Localization.ShomContinuity

ShomContinuity #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Continuity of m |-> shom_m: two-sided ratio control across scales #

ABK26, l.shom.continuity and its proof; the consuming display e.switchtheshoms.betterer.again of the localization shom-switch.

What is delivered #

For the genuine running diffusivity Annealed.sigmaBar on the Section 3 carriers, on the premise list of l.shom.continuity --- mstarstar < m0 (the correction of the printed mstar < m0; see the dedicated section below), the induction state S(m0-1,E), E >= C cstar^{-1} and cgamma <= E^{-10} --- and for every pair of integer scales n <= m <= m0:

  1. the quarter comparison shom_m >= (1/4) shom_n, and its ratio form shom_n shom_m^{-1} <= 4, which is the honest constant of the switch step's quoted shom_m^{-1} shom_{l-h} <= 2;
  2. the growth cap shom_m <= 4 . 3^{cgamma (m-n)} shom_n;
  3. its short-range collapse shom_m shom_n^{-1} <= 12 whenever cgamma (m-n) <= 1 (the printed 3^{cgamma h} <= 3 step);
  4. the two-sided defect display e.shom.m.vs.shom.n, at the printed second entry of the minimum,
  |shom_m shom_n^{-1} - 1| + |shom_n shom_m^{-1} - 1|
      <= C . min{1, cgamma (m-n) + E^2 cgamma |log cgamma|^2} . 3^{cgamma (m-n)} .

The route: the three-branch split #

The display is proved by one case split on the size of the min-entry and, inside the small branch, one dichotomy against the flow's relative defect delta := Cflow cstar^{-1} E cgamma^{1/2} |log cgamma|. Write x := cgamma (m-n) and Es := E^2 cgamma |log cgamma|^2.

Branch (C) is where the printed entry is produced; branches (A) and (B) never see it. The manuscript's medium band (1/2)min{1,cstar^2} cgamma^{-1} <= m-n <= cgamma^{-1} disappears under the sharpened gate ---, which records that the printed C = C(d) is not attainable from the quoted input alone but is attainable after the sharpening.

The scale gate on m0 (-bin statement change) #

The landmark premise carried below is mStarStar M < m0, not the printed m0 in (mstar, infty) cap Z. The two producers consumed below are already stated at the corrected gate, so the change here is the single binder and nothing else: the proof forwards the premise to them verbatim.

Inputs consumed, never re-proved #

References #

Branches (B) and (C) on the Section 3 carriers #

Branch (C) on the Section 3 carriers #

The two producers, stitched over the whole window #

The defect display: the three-branch dispatch #

The node's arithmetic on the Section 3 carriers #

theorem Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Localization.shom_continuity (d : ℕ) :
∃ (C : ℝ), 0 < C ∧ ∀ (M : ABKModel d) (m0 : ℤ) (E : { E : ℝ // 1 ≤ E }), mStarStar M < m0 → Frozen.Section3.inductionState M (m0 - 1) E → C * (Disorder.cstar M)⁻¹ ≤ ↑E → M.gamma ≤ (↑E)⁻¹ ^ 10 → ∀ (m n : ℤ), n ≤ m → m ≤ m0 → 1 / 4 * ↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M n) ≤ ↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M m) ∧ ↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M n) * (↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M m))⁻¹ ≤ 4 ∧ ↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M m) ≤ 4 * 3 ^ (M.gamma * (↑m - ↑n)) * ↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M n) ∧ (M.gamma * (↑m - ↑n) ≤ 1 → ↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M m) * (↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M n))⁻¹ ≤ 12) ∧ |↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M m) * (↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M n))⁻¹ - 1| + |↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M n) * (↑(Annealed.sigmaBar M m))⁻¹ - 1| ≤ C * min 1 (M.gamma * (↑m - ↑n) + ↑E ^ 2 * (M.gamma * |Real.log M.gamma| ^ 2)) * 3 ^ (M.gamma * (↑m - ↑n))

Continuity of m |-> shom_m (l.shom.continuity, ABK26), on the printed premise list with the landmark gate at mStarStar M < m0, for every pair of integer scales n <= m <= m0.

Proved from Closure.diffusivity_asymptotics_proved and Closure.recurrenceIntegrationBinders_of_twoSidedClosure together with the closure contract's two produced obligations (closureInteriorBesovEnvelopeInput_proved, closureStripRemainder_proved), and the below-landmark binder producer ApproximateRecurrence.recurrence_binders_of_below_landmark.