Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Multiscale.ConclusionSeam3Closure

ConclusionSeam3Closure #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Local seam-3 providers: cut-off optimization, Γ₁ conversion, and product #

Provider/Multiscale/ConclusionSeam3.lean and Provider/Multiscale/ConclusionData.lean leave the seam-3 chain of ABK26's p.bfA.multiscalebound Step 3 (|b_L| branch, together with the 3^{γh_hat_sep} reduction) with exactly three open items, each named in their own "What is not proved" sections:

  1. the cut-off H is free --- measureReal_upperTailEvent_seamLayerObject_hsep_le and its hA-discharged form measureReal_upperTailEvent_seamLayerObject_hsep_envelope_le are tail bounds at a fixed t with a free H, not weak-Orlicz statements;
  2. the 3^{γh_hat_sep} product half is uncomposed --- ConclusionData records as "read, not consumed: the 3^{γh_hat_sep} product half of the seam is ConclusionSeam3.three_rpow_gamma_hsep_mul_le_two_mul_add, which this module does not touch; the composition here uses only the tail-decomposition half."

This module proves local Provider results for all three A items. Nothing else about the b_L branch is touched, and no source-node or fractional closure is claimed.

1--2. The cut-off optimization and the Γ₁ conversion #

P[ X_{h_hat_sep(ω)}(ω) > A t ]  ≤  (H+1) e^{−t}  +  C(σ,b) exp(−3^{(1−σ)bH}) .

The union cost is linear in H while the remainder decays DOUBLY exponentially in H, so the cut-off can be taken as large as H(t) = ⌈Λ t⌉ while still paying only Λ t + 2 for the union. With

Λ = Λ(C, β) = 5 + C + 2 (β log 3)^{−2} ,      β = (1 − σ) b ,   C = C(σ, b) ,

both terms are at most (Λt + 2 + C) e^{−Λt} ≤ e^{−t}, and the conclusion is a genuine Γ₁ statement at the scale Λ A. Γ₁ is the index the printed display itself carries on this leg, so nothing is degraded.

isBigOWith_gammaSigma_one_of_cutoff_tail_le is this argument at an abstract family and an abstract ℕ-valued index; like measureReal_upperTailEvent_diagonal_le it needs no measurability of the index, no independence and no summation.

The h-free scale #

An IsBigOWith scale may not depend on t, so the cut-off optimization needs a common scale for ALL shell indices, not just for h ≤ H. ConclusionData's seamLayerScale_le_of_le supplies the envelope at the D index of a finite range; this module takes the same envelope to H → ∞. Concretely the only h-dependence of the proved e.kmn.bounds scale is `min{γ^{−1/2}, (L − ℓ

The cost. Saturation is not free: the proved h-dependent seam scale carries γ · min{γ^{−1}, L − ℓ + h}, and the saturated one carries γ · γ^{−1} = 1. Relative to the printed amplitude γ(L−n) 3^{2γ(L−n)} this is an amplitude enlargement (to the min's saturating branch), stated here and not hidden in a constant. It is not an exponent change and not an Orlicz-index change; the alternative trade --- keeping γ(L−n) and letting the scale grow linearly in t --- costs Γ₁ → Γ_{1/2}, i.e. a genuine index loss, and is NOT taken.

3. The 3^{γh_hat_sep} product #

ConclusionSeam3.three_rpow_gamma_hsep_mul_le_two_mul_add gives, for every nonnegative Y, the split 3^{γh_hat_sep} Y ≤ 2Y + Z Y together with Z ≤ O_{Γ_τ}(S_Z) at the-honest index τ = (1−σ)σ₂/((1−σ)+σ₂). Taking Y to be the seam's own diagonal layer object --- which item 1--2 has just priced at Γ₁ --- and composing gives

3^{γh_hat_sep} · (seam layer object at ℓ − h_hat_sep)  ≤  O_{Γ_{τ/(τ+1)}}( · ) ,

by e.multGammasig on Z·Y (Orlicz.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_mul_of_nonneg, i.e. CoarseGraining's explicit gammaProductConst), the exponent downgrade Γ₁ → Γ_{τ/(τ+1)} on 2Y, and a two-event union bound on the sum. The product index τ/(τ+1) = τ·1/(τ+1) is e.multGammasig read at (σ₁, σ₂) = (τ, 1); neither Γ₄ nor Γ₂ is claimed anywhere, exactly as requires.

What is not proved #

Main results #

References #

Abstract real arithmetic #

Model-free weak-Orlicz plumbing #

Absorbing a multiplicative constant into the scale. A tail bound P[W > A t] ≤ K e^{−t^ρ} with K ≥ 1 is a Γ_ρ bound at the scale (1 + log K)^{1/ρ} A: the inflation is exactly what turns K into 1, and the Orlicz exponent is unchanged.

The two-event union bound at the upper-tail events of a sum.

The sum of two Γ_ρ variables is Γ_ρ at the sum of the scales, inflated by (1 + log 2)^{1/ρ}: the two-event union bound costs a factor 2, and isBigOWith_gammaSigma_of_measureReal_le_const_mul absorbs it. No measurability is used.

The cut-off optimization #

The shell-index-free envelope of the e.kmn.bounds scale #

Seam 3 at Γ₁ #

The 3^{gamma hsep} product, composed #