ConclusionSeam3Closure #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
Local seam-3 providers: cut-off optimization, Γ₁ conversion, and product #
Provider/Multiscale/ConclusionSeam3.lean and
Provider/Multiscale/ConclusionData.lean leave the seam-3 chain of ABK26's
p.bfA.multiscalebound Step 3 (|b_L| branch, together with the 3^{γh_hat_sep}
reduction) with exactly three open items, each named in their own "What is not
proved" sections:
- the cut-off
His free ---measureReal_upperTailEvent_seamLayerObject_hsep_leand itshA-discharged formmeasureReal_upperTailEvent_seamLayerObject_hsep_envelope_leare tail bounds at a fixedtwith a freeH, not weak-Orlicz statements; - the
3^{γh_hat_sep}product half is uncomposed ---ConclusionDatarecords as "read, not consumed: the3^{γh_hat_sep}product half of the seam isConclusionSeam3.three_rpow_gamma_hsep_mul_le_two_mul_add, which this module does not touch; the composition here uses only the tail-decomposition half."
This module proves local Provider results for all three A items. Nothing else
about the b_L branch is touched, and no source-node or fractional closure is
claimed.
1--2. The cut-off optimization and the Γ₁ conversion #
P[ X_{h_hat_sep(ω)}(ω) > A t ] ≤ (H+1) e^{−t} + C(σ,b) exp(−3^{(1−σ)bH}) .
The union cost is linear in H while the remainder decays DOUBLY exponentially in
H, so the cut-off can be taken as large as H(t) = ⌈Λ t⌉ while still paying
only Λ t + 2 for the union. With
Λ = Λ(C, β) = 5 + C + 2 (β log 3)^{−2} , β = (1 − σ) b , C = C(σ, b) ,
both terms are at most (Λt + 2 + C) e^{−Λt} ≤ e^{−t}, and the conclusion is a
genuine Γ₁ statement at the scale Λ A. Γ₁ is the index the printed
display itself carries on this leg, so nothing is degraded.
isBigOWith_gammaSigma_one_of_cutoff_tail_le is this argument at an abstract
family and an abstract ℕ-valued index; like measureReal_upperTailEvent_diagonal_le
it needs no measurability of the index, no independence and no summation.
The h-free scale #
An IsBigOWith scale may not depend on t, so the cut-off optimization needs
a common scale for ALL shell indices, not just for h ≤ H. ConclusionData's
seamLayerScale_le_of_le supplies the envelope at the D index of a finite
range; this module takes the same envelope to H → ∞. Concretely the only
h-dependence of the proved e.kmn.bounds scale is `min{γ^{−1/2}, (L − ℓ
- h)^{1/2}}
insidestreamPointScale, and replacing that minimum by its saturating entryγ^{−1/2}gives anh-free bound with NO hypothesis at all (streamPointScale_le_streamPointScaleSatismin_le_left).seamLayerScaleSat` is the resulting seam scale.
The cost. Saturation is not free: the proved h-dependent seam
scale carries γ · min{γ^{−1}, L − ℓ + h}, and the saturated one carries γ · γ^{−1} = 1. Relative to the printed amplitude γ(L−n) 3^{2γ(L−n)} this is an
amplitude enlargement (to the min's saturating branch), stated here and not
hidden in a constant. It is not an exponent change and not an Orlicz-index
change; the alternative trade --- keeping γ(L−n) and letting the scale grow
linearly in t --- costs Γ₁ → Γ_{1/2}, i.e. a genuine index loss, and is NOT
taken.
3. The 3^{γh_hat_sep} product #
ConclusionSeam3.three_rpow_gamma_hsep_mul_le_two_mul_add gives, for every
nonnegative Y, the split 3^{γh_hat_sep} Y ≤ 2Y + Z Y together with Z ≤ O_{Γ_τ}(S_Z) at the-honest index τ = (1−σ)σ₂/((1−σ)+σ₂). Taking Y to be
the seam's own diagonal layer object --- which item 1--2 has just priced at
Γ₁ --- and composing gives
3^{γh_hat_sep} · (seam layer object at ℓ − h_hat_sep) ≤ O_{Γ_{τ/(τ+1)}}( · ) ,
by e.multGammasig on Z·Y (Orlicz.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_mul_of_nonneg,
i.e. CoarseGraining's explicit gammaProductConst), the exponent downgrade Γ₁ → Γ_{τ/(τ+1)} on 2Y, and a two-event union bound on the sum. The product
index τ/(τ+1) = τ·1/(τ+1) is e.multGammasig read at (σ₁, σ₂) = (τ, 1);
neither Γ₄ nor Γ₂ is claimed anywhere, exactly as requires.
What is not proved #
- No per-layer weight and no
k-sum. blocks the printed3^{−3k/4}independently, and nothing here approaches it. The6d·3^{−k}inside the scale is the proved Whitney layer mass fractionLayerMass.sum_cubeMassRatio_whitneyLayer_le, unchanged; no sum overkis formed. - No re-derivation of the printed amplitude. The saturated envelope is an
upper bound on the proved scale, as described above; the printed
γ(L−n)is not recovered and is not claimed. - The first printed inequality of the display (per-simplex to per-cube) is
proved in
ConclusionSeam1PerCube, which also proves a local result for the per-simplex object atd²·seamDiagonalScale. - No
e.bL.multiscaleheadline. The three local results here concern the seam's own; the Step-3 assembly, itsk₀tuning and the terminalexp(−cE^{−2}γ^{−1})absorption are not performed. - No measurability and no independence are used anywhere below, and none is
proved:
h_hat_sepis never assumed measurable, and every aggregation is a union bound.
Main results #
Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Multiscale.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_of_measureReal_le_const_mul: a tail boundP[W > A t] ≤ K e^{−t^ρ}withK ≥ 1is aΓ_ρbound at the scale(1 + log K)^{1/ρ} A, the Orlicz exponent unchanged.Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Multiscale.measureReal_upperTailEvent_add_le: the two-event union bound at the upper-tail events of a sum.Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Multiscale.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_add: the sum of twoΓ_ρvariables isΓ_ρat the sum of the scales, inflated by(1 + log 2)^{1/ρ}; no measurability is used.
References #
- ABK26,
p.bfA.multiscaleboundStep 3: the3^{γh_hat_sep}reduction, the|b_L|branch (theℓdefinition, the display and its terminalΓ₁leg);e.hsep.tails;e.kmn.bounds;e.indc.O.sigma;e.multGammasig. Provider/Multiscale/ConclusionSeam3.lean(the decomposition, theh_hat_septail and the/ split),Provider/Multiscale/ConclusionData.lean(the finite-range shell envelope),Provider/Multiscale/HsepReduction.lean(the Orlicz half),Provider/Orlicz/ProductPower.lean(e.multGammasig).
Abstract real arithmetic #
Model-free weak-Orlicz plumbing #
Absorbing a multiplicative constant into the scale. A tail bound P[W > A t] ≤ K e^{−t^ρ} with K ≥ 1 is a Γ_ρ bound at the scale (1 + log K)^{1/ρ} A: the inflation is exactly what turns K into 1, and the Orlicz exponent
is unchanged.
The two-event union bound at the upper-tail events of a sum.
The sum of two Γ_ρ variables is Γ_ρ at the sum of the scales, inflated
by (1 + log 2)^{1/ρ}: the two-event union bound costs a factor 2, and
isBigOWith_gammaSigma_of_measureReal_le_const_mul absorbs it. No measurability
is used.