WaveThirdTermSquared #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The squared three-term display: what Step 3 consumes #
Step 2 of p.bfA.multiscalebound proves e.wave.influence.bound in its
printed three-term form (WaveThirdTerm.wave_influence_bound_three_terms), an
inequality for the unsquared amplitude
gamma^{1/2} 3^{-gamma ell} || k_L - k_{ell - hsep} ||_{Lbar^4(cu_lout)}
<= waveHeadTerm + waveUpperTerm + waveTailTerm .
Step 3's |b_L| branch consumes the square of that quantity,
gamma . 3^{-2 gamma ell} . || k_L - k_{n-k-h_k} ||^2_{Lbar^4(cu)} ,
after the manuscript's own Cauchy--Schwarz/Hölder step
(avsum gamma^2 3^{-4 gamma ell} |.|^4)^{1/2} <= avsum gamma 3^{-2 gamma ell} ||.||^2_{Lbar^4}. Squaring a sum of three terms is not free: the cross terms
have to be paid for. This module proves the squared display.
The cross terms #
The manuscript writes the three-term bound and then squares it silently. The honest cost is the elementary
(a + b + c)^2 <= 3 (a^2 + b^2 + c^2) (a, b, c real) ,
i.e. Cauchy--Schwarz on (1,1,1); the factor 3 is sharp (equality at
a = b = c). three_mul_sq_add_sq_add_sq_le below is that inequality, proved
as an abstract real fact. No sharper split is available for a general triple,
and none is needed: the three squared legs are then priced separately.
The three squared legs #
- head: deterministic, and the square collapses in closed form. The
proved
waveHeadTerm_legiveshead <= C(d) gamma^{1/2} hsep^{1/2}, sohead^2 <= C(d)^2 gamma hsep--- literally the manuscript's first termcgamma hsep, with an explicit dimensional constant. (The square of the minimummin{gamma^{-1/2}, hsep^{1/2}}carried bywaveL4Headis even smaller; the printedgamma hsepis what the consumer asks for and is what is proved.) - upper: the
r = 2instance ofe.powerofGammasigma(Orlicz.ProductPower.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_sq_iff_of_nonneg) at the provedGamma_2leg.Gamma_2at scaleKgivesGamma_{2/2} = Gamma_1at scaleK^2--- the printed indexGamma_1exactly. The statement below carrieswaveUpperScale ^ 2verbatim and claims nothing more. The direction check the seam needs survives: squaring divides the Orlicz index, it does not multiply it. - tail: the same
r = 2instance at the provedGamma_{2 sigma_2/(2+sigma_2)}leg, givingGamma_{sigma_2/(2+sigma_2)}at scalewaveTailGainScale^2, which carries3^{-(d/4)(lout-ell)}--- the square of the proved3^{-(d/8)(lout-ell)}, computed correctly here. The printed gain isC 3^{-(d/10) k_0}--- a different exponent constant at a different argument --- so the identification with the printed gain is the consumer's to make, not established in this file. The printed index isGamma_{(1+sigma)^{-1}}: the two agree atsigma_2 = 2/sigma, sincesigma_2/(2+sigma_2) = 1/(1 + 2/sigma_2).sigma_2 > 0is free, so the printed index is attainable; nothing below fixes it.
What is not proved #
The instantiation ell = n - k - h_k + hsep (the manuscript's own ell), the
cube average avsum_{cu in W(cu_n,k)} in front of the display, and the Hölder
step that produced the square are the consumer's; this module squares the
pointwise display only.
References #
- ABK26,
p.bfA.multiscalebound, Step 2 and Step 3's|b_L|branch;e.powerofGammasigma.
The cross terms #
Nonnegativity of the two Orlicz scales #
The squared amplitude #
The squared head, in closed form: head^2 <= C(d)^2 gamma hsep, the
manuscript's first term cgamma hsep with an explicit dimensional constant.