HomogenizationLanes #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
Provider: the lane aggregation and corridor consumption of e.what.homogenization.gives #
ABK26, §3.6.
s * sum_{l = -infty}^{m} 3^{-s(m-l)}
( avsum_{z in 3^l Z^d cap cu_m}
max_{|e| = 1} J(z + cu_l, shom_{l-h}^{-1/2} e, shom_{l-h}^{1/2} e; a_{l-h})^{d/s}
)^{s/d}
<= O_{Gamma_1}(C s^{-1} eps E^2 cgamma)
+ O_{Gamma_{1/4}}(C eps exp(-E^{-3} cgamma^{-1})) ,
proved in the manuscript in one sentence: "an immediate consequence of
Proposition p.homogenization.step, the triangle inequality
e.Gamma.sigma.triangle and the fact that s >= 8 cgamma, provided that h:= C |log eps| for C large enough".
This module is the other half: the (l, z) aggregation, the corridor
bookkeeping, and the a.e.-to-pointwise bridge.
The route #
Fix a depth j, write l = m - j, and let N_j = 3^{dj} be the depth-j grid cardinality.
- The grid maximum. The per-cube inputs at depth
jshare one amplitude pair, so the maximum over theN_jcubes isGamma_sigmaat(3 max{1, log N_j})^{1/sigma} A--- the manuscript's ownl.maximums.Gamma.s, in the proved singleton-safe formOrlicz.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_finset_sup'_of_nonempty. - The power-mean ceiling. A power mean is below the maximum of its
arguments, so the printed
(avsum_z (.)^{d/s})^{s/d}is below that grid maximum. This is the provedBreakdown.legScaleAverage_le_const; it costs nothing. - The depth sum. The per-depth amplitudes
3^{-sj} (3 max{1, d j log 3})^{1/sigma} Aare summable, with the closed forms of sections 3 and 4 below:45 d s^{-2} A_1on theGamma_1lane and12000000 d^4 s^{-5} A_2on theGamma_{1/4}lane. The countableGamma_sigmatriangle inequality (Orlicz.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_tsum_of_tsum_le, constantgammaTriangleConst sigma) then produces one envelope per lane.
After the printed normalization by s the amplitudes are C(d) s^{-1} A_1 and
C(d) s^{-4} A_2. So this module delivers the best profile the manuscript's
own proof supports.
A divergence of route. The printed one-line proof attributes the
z-aggregation to e.Gamma.sigma.triangle. That route is not taken here, for
a formalization reason: the available gammaTriangleConst sigma = 4 gammaGrowthConst sigma ^ 12 is not the sharp M_sigma ~ sigma^{-1/sigma},
and at the index sigma s/d it inflates s^{-4} to s^{-48}. This module
therefore routes through the Appendix's own l.maximums.Gamma.s per depth and
the triangle inequality across depths, where the index is fixed at 1 and
1/4 and the constant is absolute. Same displays, same exponents, different
mechanism.
The amplitudes, and how they meet the frozen root #
At eps' := eps^2 the per-cube input carries A_1 = eps^2 E^2 cgamma and A_2 = eps^2 exp(-2 E^{-3} cgamma^{-1}) (the sharp rate). The two lanes therefore
read, after the printed normalization by s,
Gamma_1 : C_ord(d) s^{-1} eps^2 E^2 cgamma ,
Gamma_{1/4} : C_rare(d) s^{-4} eps^2 exp(-2 E^{-3} cgamma^{-1}) .
The first is below the printed C s^{-1} eps E^2 cgamma a fortiori (eps <= 1/2).
Deliverables #
- ** the lane aggregation** ---
exists_envelope_gridScaleSeries_of_perCube(abstract) andexists_envelope_gridScaleSeries_homogenizationInput(at the development's carriers, on the provedGoodEventAggregation.gridScaleSeries). The domination is ONE almost-sure statement with the depth and cube quantifiers inside the event, so the per-cube input's common-event structure survives in the statement. The concrete proof does take the countable intersection --- the per-cube producer emits one a.e. statement per(j, R)and section 8 collects them byMeasureTheory.ae_all_iffover depths andFilter.eventually_all_finsetover each depth's finite grid --- which is harmless (countable intersection of full-measure sets) and exactly why the strong form is provable. - (c) the pointwise endpoint ---
exists_witnesses_of_envelope. The device is the web's unconditionalexists_witnesses_ae_eq_of_ae_le: the returned witnesses are almost everywhere equal to the envelopes, so a further tail of those envelopes transfers and the frozen conclusion's second conjunct survives on the sameY.
geometricDiscount_two_mul_le_of_nonneg is the seam to
e.localization.mathcalE.estimate's own normalization: c_{2s} <= 4 s at the
localization side's own carrier from
Provider.Localization.geometricDiscount_two_le_four_mul, so the
s-normalized display dominates the localization lemma's first term at an
absolute cost.
Named gaps, with owners #
The max_e carrier and the measurability of the display are items 1 and 2
above.
Sources #
- ABK26: the
avsumaverage;e.what.homogenization.gives(its one-line proof and the cutoffh := C|log eps|);p.multiscale.estimateande.param.conditions.in.main; the Appendix's weak-Orlicz notation andl.maximums.Gamma.s, whose amplitude(3 log N)^{1/sigma} Ais exactly the provedProvider/Orlicz/Maximum.leanengine's.
1. The depth series #
2. The polynomial factor of the grid maximum #
3. The two depth-series amplitudes #
4. Summability of the two depth series #
5. The abstract lane aggregation #
6. The lane aggregation #
The Γ₁ constant of the aggregated ordinary lane.
Equations
Instances For
The Γ_{1/4} constant of the aggregated rare lane.
Equations
- Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.MultiscaleEstimate.homLaneRareConst d = HCPolySupport.IndependentSums.gammaTriangleConst (1 / 4) * (12000000 * ↑d ^ 4)
Instances For
The lane aggregation, abstractly. A per-(depth, cube) family of
two-term inputs at one common amplitude pair (A₁, A₂) — the shape the
ε²-route homogenization step delivers at every scale l = m - j and every
grid cube — is aggregated into a single measurable envelope pair for the whole
printed grid series
Σ_{l ≤ m} 3^{-s(m-l)} ( ⨍_{z ∈ 3^l ℤ^d ∩ □_m} leg_l(z+□_l)^{d/s} )^{s/d} .
Both the hypothesis hdom and the conclusion are ONE almost-sure statement whose depth and
cube quantifiers sit inside the event, so this theorem takes no countable intersection at all:
the common-event structure of the per-cube input survives the aggregation. (Section 8, whose
producer emits one a.e. statement per (j, R), does take it, harmlessly, to build hdom.)
8. The lane aggregation at the development's carriers #
e.what.homogenization.gives, aggregated. With h any integer cutoff
meeting the corridor budget h ≥ 2 Chom |log ε|, the printed grid series of
the per-(l, z) responses at the deep coefficient family a_{l-h} and the
deep gauge σ_{l-h} admits one measurable envelope pair with the
homogenization step's own two lanes. leg is the caller's carrier for the
printed max_{|e|=1}: the hypothesis hlegub says only that it is an U BOUND
of the unit-direction responses in the least-upper-bound sense, which every
max/sSup carrier satisfies.
9. The two normalizations, the printed one and the localization one #
The normalization seam, by consumption. e.what.homogenization.gives is
normalized by s and e.localization.mathcalE.estimate's first term by 6 c_{2s}; the two are compared by c_{2s} = 1 - 3^{-2s} ≤ 4 s, the proved
Provider.Localization.geometricDiscount_two_le_four_mul
(AggregationRemainder.lean). The statement is at the localization side's
own carrier Book.Ch02.geometricDiscount; section 1's geometricDiscount is
the second name (Homogenization.geometricDiscount) of the same function 1 - 3^{-s q}.
A first delivery re-proved the sharper c_{2s} ≤ 2 log 3 s from
Real.add_one_le_exp under a public named geometricDiscount_two_le. The
sharpness is not load-bearing (the seam's cost is absolute either way) and the
name is already taken by Provider.CoarseEllipticity.geometricDiscount_two_le
(ProfileClose.lean, same 4 s), so that public was D.
10. The printed normalization and the pointwise endpoint #
From an almost-everywhere domination to a pointwise one. A measurable
observable dominated almost everywhere by an envelope pair is a two-term
weak-Orlicz datum with named witnesses,
and the returned witnesses are almost everywhere equal to the given envelopes —
so every further tail of those envelopes transfers to the returned pair. The
device is the web's unconditional exists_witnesses_ae_eq_of_ae_le, consumed,
not re-derived.