IncrementLaw #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The restriction-law carrier of a finite stream increment #
The node e.kl.bounds.large of l.km.kn.Lp.estimates (ABK26) improves the
l-uniform estimate e.kmn.bounds on scales larger than 3^m by combining
the finite-range assumption a.j.frd with the concentration proposition
p.concentration, applied to the average of the cube L^p masses over the
scale-m subcubes of cu_l.
The concentration input available to this repository is CoarseGraining's
partition-average fluctuation theorem
isBigO_gammaSigma_restrictionCenteredDescendantAverage_of_restrictionUnitRangeDependentLaw,
whose hypotheses are structural assumptions on a restriction-lane law P: Ch04.RestrictionCoeffLaw d, namely RestrictionStationaryLaw P and
RestrictionUnitRangeDependentLaw P. This module supplies the law and both
structural assumptions for the stream increment k_m - k_n = sum_{k in (n,m]} j_k.
What is proved #
scaledStreamIncrementLaw_stationary_real,scaledStreamIncrementLaw_stationary— the joint, multi-shell translation covariance, at an arbitrary nonzero spatial rescaling. This is not the one-shell statementmap_shellObservable_translate_eq: it is the whole-sequence invarianceCutoff.sequenceLaw_stationary(derived in the Cutoff layer from the independence of the shells, the marginal scaling law and (J1)), pushed through the exact commutationtranslateReg_finiteShellIncrement.scaledStreamIncrementLaw_unitRangeDependent— CoarseGraining's unit-range dependence for a rescaled increment law. Any factor leaving strict bridge slack for the literal rangesqrt(d) 3^mturns that range into a strictly sub-unit one, exactly asCutoff.RangeNormalizationdoes for the coefficient cutoffa_m.partitionStreamIncrementLaw, the rescaling the partition step can actually use, at the depthCutoff.cutoffNormalizationDepth d m;partitionStreamIncrementLaw_stationaryandpartitionStreamIncrementLaw_unitRangeDependentare the two structural assumptions the concentration theorem asks for, at that law.scaledStreamIncrementLaw_eq_map, the un-normalization dictionary: every statement about a rescaled law is a statement aboutx |-> (k_m - k_n)(r x)underM.P.
References #
- ABK26,
e.kl.bounds.large;l.km.kn.Lp.estimates; the cutoff range;a.j.frd. Algsuperdiff/Section3/Cutoff/RangeNormalization.lean, the same normalization for the coefficient cutoff.
Continuity of the increment in the space variable #
Every matrix entry of a finite stream increment is continuous in the point: the increment is a finite sum of shells, each of which is a continuous matrix-valued path.
Joint multi-shell translation covariance #
Translating the whole shell sequence translates the finite increment. This
is the multi-shell covariance the concentration input needs: it is an exact
identity of regular coefficient fields, uniform in the finitely many shells
(n, m].
Locality of the increment in the lower-shell stream #
A finite stream increment reads only shells of index at most m, so it is
measurable for the lower-shell integral-local sigma-field at scale m. No
relation between n and m is needed: for m < n the increment is the zero
field.
Spatially rescaled increment laws #
CoarseGraining's restriction-lane partition-average concentration theorem
isBigO_gammaSigma_restrictionCenteredDescendantAverage_of_restrictionUnitRangeDependentLaw
requires its subcube scale to be >= 0, because its proof reaches a
descendant cube from the origin cube by an integer translation and
RestrictionStationaryLaw is integer-translation invariance only. The
normalization depth of Cutoff.RangeNormalization (which sends the range
sqrt(d) 3^m below 1) sends the scale-m subcubes to a strictly negative
scale, so it cannot be the normalization used for the partition step.: NO
rescaling clears the CoarseGraining 0 ≤ n restriction for the manuscript's
own scale-m subcubes — unit range needs r > 2·sqrt(d)·3^m > 3^m while
nonnegative subcube scale needs r ≤ 3^m; the two are incompatible. The
factor may be a negative power of 3, outside the range of
restrictionScaleNormalizedLaw : ℕ → _.
Both normalizations are therefore obtained here from one statement about an
arbitrary nonzero spatial scaling smulReg r.
The increment law spatially rescaled by a nonzero factor r: the law of
x |-> (k_m - k_n)(r x).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Translation commutes with spatial rescaling on the carrier.
Real-translation stationarity survives every spatial rescaling, because the increment law is invariant under all real translations.
Unit-range dependence of the normalized increment law #
CoarseGraining's exact unit-range dependence for a rescaled increment law.
The increment k_m - k_n reads only shells of index at most m, whose joint
integral-local information has literal Euclidean range sqrt(d) 3^m
(Cutoff.indep_lowerShellLocalSigma_of_cutoff_separation). Rescaling by any
factor r that leaves strict epsilon = 1/4 bridge slack for that range turns
it into a strictly sub-unit range, which is CoarseGraining's
RestrictionUnitRangeDependentLaw after the thickening bridge. This is the
RestrictionUnitRangeDependentLaw hypothesis of
isBigO_gammaSigma_restrictionCenteredDescendantAverage_of_restrictionUnitRangeDependentLaw.
The partition normalization #
CoarseGraining's restriction-lane partition theorem needs its subcube scale
to be ≥ 0. The scale that achieves this sends the scale-m subcubes to
scale 0, i.e. rescales by 3^{m+c} where 3^c > 2 sqrt(d); this is in
general not a rescaling by a natural power of 3, so it is outside the
range of restrictionScaleNormalizedLaw.
The dimensional shift c: the least triadic depth with 3^c > 2 sqrt(d).
Equations
Instances For
The partition normalization factor 3^{m+c}: it sends the scale-m
subcubes of the partition to unit cubes and the literal range sqrt(d) 3^m
strictly below the bridge budget.
Equations
Instances For
The partition-normalized increment law: the law of x |-> (k_m - k_n)(3^{m+c} x), under which the scale-(m+c) subcubes of cu_l become the
scale-0 descendants of cu_{l-m-c} (the scale-m subcubes land at scale
-c;).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.