Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Whitney.PartitionCovering

PartitionCovering #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

d.whitney.bad-set.definitions, the partition contract: covering and boundary geometry #

This module proves local versions of two clauses of ABK26's sss.whitney.partition that the definition module BadSetDefinitions states but does not prove:

Why the open root cube #

Homogenization.cubeSet is the half-open realization โˆแตข [ยท, ยท); this is the realization for which triadic subdivision is an exact partition. The manuscript's termination clause says that no element of ๐’ฒ(โ–ก_m) touches โˆ‚โ–ก_m, so no Whitney cube can contain a point of โˆ‚โ–ก_m, while the half-open cubeSet (originCube d m) does contain its own "lower" faces. The exact identity is therefore with openCubeSet (originCube d m), and this is the honest reading of "partition of โ–ก_m" here; it is also the form the simplicial refinement iUnion_carrier_simplexPartition composes with. Stronger still: the manuscript's root cube is literally open โ€” defines โ–ก_m:= (โˆ’ยฝยท3^m, ยฝยท3^m)^d โ€” so the open form is not merely forced by the termination clause, it is the printed carrier itself.

Provider hypotheses #

References #

Boundary-index arithmetic #

theorem Algsuperdiff.Section3.Provider.Whitney.extremeIdx_mul_zpow (m : โ„ค) (t : โ„•) :
โ†‘(extremeIdx t) * 3 ^ (m - โ†‘t) + 3 ^ (m - โ†‘t) / 2 = 3 ^ m / 2

The extreme index of a depth-t descendant sits exactly one half-cube inside โˆ‚โ–ก_m: E_t ยท 3^{m-t} + 3^{m-t}/2 = 3^m/2.

A non-touching depth-t descendant of โ–ก_m has strictly sub-extreme index in every coordinate.

โ–ก_m touches its own boundary: the seed of the Whitney recursion. This is the single place where the dimension hypothesis enters.

Closed cubes, open cubes and the frontier of โ–ก_m #

Coordinatewise membership in the closed realization of a triadic cube.

The geometric characterization of TouchesBoundary #

Every Whitney cube lies in the open root cube #

The termination clause, geometrically: a Whitney cube does not meet โˆ‚โ–ก_m; its closed realization sits inside the open root cube.

The boundary margin of a touching ancestor #

The boundary-margin estimate (one-sided half): a boundary-touching cube of size 3^{m-n} containing x forces x to be within 3^{m-n} of โˆ‚โ–ก_m in the โ„“^โˆž sense.

Contrapositive of the margin estimate: a cube much smaller than the distance from x to โˆ‚โ–ก_m cannot touch โˆ‚โ–ก_m.

The covering #

Every point of the open root cube exits the boundary recursion at a finite layer. This is the constructive content of the covering clause.

๐’ฒ(โ–ก_m) covers โ–ก_m: the half-open Whitney cubes tile the open root cube exactly.

Pairwise disjointness #

Whitney cubes containing a common point coincide. No hypothesis on the depth profile hn is needed.