Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.BoundsEaL.LambdaIndexUpscale

LambdaIndexUpscale #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Bullet (B5) at the indices: the domain/field upscaling for λ^{-1} #

The index gap this module closes #

LambdaSlotB5.lean delivers bullet (B5) at the anchor's own matched triple (□_{k−2}, 𝐚_{k−2}, σ_{k−3}). Read in the Step-4 indices this is the cube □_j with the field 𝐚_j, whereas the printed bullet carries the field 𝐚_{j−2} at the same cube □_j and the same gauge σ_{j−1}.

The route, and every constant it costs #

Read the delivered atom at the lower index k = j, i.e. at the triple (□_{j−2}, 𝐚_{j−2}, σ_{j−3}), and raise the domain back to □_j:

  1. The domain raise. lambdaSq_finite_two_inv_le_nine_pow_mul_max_descendants_sub_two (Annular/LambdaMatrixRoute.lean) gives λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(□_j;𝐚_{j−2}) ≤ (1 + 9^d 3^{−4γ}) max_R λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(R;𝐚_{j−2}) over the 9^d scale-(j−2) descendants R of □_j, at the SAME gauge and the SAME field. The sharp constant is only relaxed to 1 + 9^d.
  2. The atom tail at every descendant. Each descendant is the cube 3^{j−2}w + □_{j−2} at the field 𝐚_{j−2}, i.e. exactly the delivered atom at k = j and the real centre 3^{j−2}w; the proved Proportion.exists_cgExcess_atomTail holds real centre, and LambdaWindow.exists_cgExcess_atomTail_unconditional removes its window.
  3. The Orlicz finite maximum. Orlicz.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_finset_sup'_of_nonempty at σ = 1/3 converts the 9^d individual Γ_{1/3} tails into one tail for their maximum, at the common amplitude times (3 max{1, log 9^d})^{3} (the q^{1/σ} normalization at σ = 1/3), a d-only factor.
  4. W3's index steps, twice. Annular.sigmaBar_sub_two_le_eight_mul_sigmaBar_sub_three gives σ_{j−1} ≤ 8 σ_{j−2} ≤ 64 σ_{j−3}, i.e. σ_{j−3}^{-1} ≤ 64 σ_{j−1}^{-1}, which is what turns the delivered gauge into the printed one.

Net deterministic constant 64(1 + 9^d), d-only; the Orlicz leg carries in addition the d-only maximum factor of step 3. No γ-exponent and no s-power is moved anywhere in this module: the gauge stays γ, the exponent stays q = 2, and the amplitude stays the exp(−C_cg^{−1}E^{−2}γ^{−1}).

References #

1. Three local re-derivations #

2. The printed atom and its descendant family #

The (B5) left-hand side, λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(z + □_j; 𝐚_{j−2}): domain scale j, cutoff scale j − 2, gauge γ, exponent q = 2, with the cube translate realized on the sample (resolution A4). At z = 0 this is the manuscript's centred λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(□_j; 𝐚_{j−2}) verbatim.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    The 𝒢₀ bracket, maximized over the 9^d descendants of z + □_j. This is the single random variable the Orlicz finite-maximum estimate produces, and the one that carries the whole Γ_{1/3} tail of the upscaled bullet.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      3. The pointwise upscaling (state-free) #

      theorem Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.BoundsEaL.lambdaPrintedAtom_le_descendantMax {d : ℕ} (M : Section3.ABKModel d) {Ccg : ℝ} (hCcg : 0 ≤ Ccg) (j : ℤ) (z : HCPolySupport.Vec d) (omega : Section3.Cutoff.CutoffSample d) :
      lambdaPrintedAtom M j z omega ≤ (1 + 9 ^ d) * ((↑(Section3.Annealed.sigmaBar M (j - 3)))⁻¹ * Ccg) + (1 + 9 ^ d) * ((↑(Section3.Annealed.sigmaBar M (j - 3)))⁻¹ * cgExcessDescendantMax M Ccg j z omega)

      A7's domain raise, read at the 𝒢₀ bracket.

      λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(z+□_j;𝐚_{j−2}) ≤ (1+9^d)(σ_{j−3}^{-1}C_cg + σ_{j−3}^{-1}𝒳^{max}), where 𝒳^{max} is the maximum of the 𝒢₀ brackets over the 9^d scale-(j−2) descendants. No induction state and no probability enters: this is the deterministic half of the upscaling.

      4. W3's two index steps #

      σ_{j−3}^{-1} ≤ 64 σ_{j−1}^{-1} — two applications of the one-step running-diffusivity ratio σ_{n−2} ≤ 8 σ_{n−3}. This is what converts the delivered gauge σ_{j−3} into the printed σ_{j−1}.

      5. The upscaled bullet, at the printed indices #

      The d-only deterministic constant of the upscaling, 64(1 + 9^d): 64 is W3's two index steps and 1 + 9^d is A7's domain raise.

      Equations
      Instances For

        The d-only Orlicz factor of the finite maximum over the 9^d descendants, (3 max{1, log 9^d})^{1/σ} at σ = 1/3.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Bullet (B5) at the printed indices, at every moment q ∈ [1,∞).

          E[ λ_{γ,2}^{-q}(z + □_j; 𝐚_{j−2}) ]^{1/q}
            ≤ 64(1+9^d) σ_{j−1}^{-1} C_cg
                + C(1/3) q³ · 64(1+9^d)(3 max{1,log 9^d})³ σ_{j−1}^{-1} exp(−C_cg^{−1}E^{−2}γ^{−1}) ,
          

          The q³ is q^{1/σ} at σ = 1/3. Every constant is d-only.

          The upscaled bullet, packaged and unconditional in the printed regime.

          There is a d-only constant C such that every model with γ ≤ C^{−10}c⋆^{10} satisfies bullet (B5) at the printed cube, field and gauge, at every scale j, every real centre z and every moment q ∈ [1,∞), with NO remaining hypothesis: the induction state comes from its all-scales budget and the s-window from LambdaWindow.cgTailScale_le_half_gamma.