Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.BoundsEaL.TailSummability

TailSummability #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

The upper shell series converges almost surely: hTae discharged #

What this module does #

tailLayerSum m k v ω L = Σ_{i ∈ (m, L]} ‖∇ j_i‖_{W^{1,∞}(3^k v + □_k)} ,

and tailLayerSum_le_tailSeriesGauge reduced an L-uniform bound for it to the Summableity of the layer terms. This module proves that summability -- for every cube (k, v) simultaneously -- almost surely, and therefore discharges the hTae binder of AeMajorantTransport.lintegral_observableSup_rpow_le_tsum_lintegral_lFreeStep3Majorant_of_ae at the canonical gauge T := tailSeriesGauge m.

The route #

  1. The per-layer display. Support.shellW1InfGradNorm k j is the maximum of ‖∇²j‖_{L∞(□_k)} and 3^{-k}‖∇j‖_{L∞(□_k)}, hence at most 3^{-k}(‖∇j‖_{L∞(□_k)} + 3^{k}‖∇²j‖_{L∞(□_k)}). For the shell j_i with k ≤ i the bracket is exactly the manuscript's e.nabla.jk.O gauge measured on the smaller cube, i.e. the proved Stream.isBigOWith_gammaSigma_shellDerivGauge_cube at amplitude 3^{(γ−1)i}. So the layer term is 𝒪_{Γ₂}(3^{-k} 3^{(γ−1)i}), and the amplitudes are summable in i because γ ≤ 1/4 < 1.

  2. The carriers. The display lives on Cutoff.ShellSeq d under M.P; the transfers to Cutoff.CutoffSample d under Cutoff.cutoffSampleLaw M and to the translated cube 3^k v + □_k are the proved Stream.isBigOWith_cutoffSampleLaw_of_forall_eq_comp_val and Stream.isBigOWith_comp_translateCutoffSample -- exactly the pair Proportion.G1AtomTails uses for the 𝒢₁ atoms. No lattice restriction is used: the statement holds at every real centre, so at every (k, v).

  3. The first-moment bridge. Orlicz.ae_summable_of_isBigOWith_gammaSigma: a summable family of positive Γ_σ scales forces almost sure summability (Tonelli on the first moments). It is indexed by ℕ, so the ℤ-indexed layer family is re-indexed at i₀ = max (m+1) k -- the finitely many layers i ∈ (m, k), where the cross-scale display is unavailable, are irrelevant to summability and are absorbed by summable_nat_add_iff.

  4. The countable family. MeasureTheory.ae_all_iff over the countable index ℤ × (Fin d → ℤ).

  5. The negated leg., and pointwise: every layer gauge is even (Annular.shellW1InfGradNorm_negate, Localization.translate_negate), so tailLayerTerm, tailLayerSum and tailSeriesGauge are all literally invariant under Cutoff.negateCutoffSample. The law-level invariance Cutoff.map_negateCutoffSample_cutoffSampleLaw is NOT consumed.

References #

1. The per-layer deterministic domination #

The volume-normalized gradient gauge on □_k is dominated by the e.nabla.jk.O gauge on the same cube, rescaled by 3^{-k}: the gauge is a maximum of two nonnegative legs and the bracket is their 3^{k}-weighted sum.

2. The cross-scale Γ₂ tail of one layer gauge #

The layer gauge at a smaller cube, on the shell-sequence law. For k ≤ i the gauge ‖∇j_i‖_{W^{1,∞}(□_k)} has a Γ₂ upper tail at amplitude 3^{-k} 3^{(γ−1)i}: the manuscript's e.nabla.jk.O measured on □_k and renormalized. Only proved Section 3 material enters.

The layer gauge at a translated cube, on the cutoff-sample law. The two proved transfers -- the measurable-embedding transfer to Cutoff.CutoffSample and the real-translation invariance of the cutoff-sample law -- carry the display of isBigOWith_gammaSigma_shellW1InfGradNorm_shellSeq to ‖∇j_i‖_{W^{1,∞}(z + □_k)} real centre z, at the same amplitude.

3. The geometric amplitude family #

The common ratio of the layer amplitudes: 3^{γ−1} < 1 because γ ≤ 1/4.

The exponent addition law at base 3, in the explicit Real.rpow spelling used throughout this file.

The natural-power law at base 3, in the explicit Real.rpow spelling.

4. Almost sure summability of the layer terms #

The upper shell series converges almost surely, at one cube.

For every scale k and lattice index v, the ℤ-indexed layer family of ShellSlotBounds.tailLayerTerm is almost surely summable. This is the probabilistic content of hTae.

The upper shell series converges almost surely, at every cube simultaneously. The index ℤ × (Fin d → ℤ) is countable, so the null sets of ae_summable_tailLayerTerm may be unioned.

5. The negated leg, pointwise #

Every layer gauge is even, so the ℤ-indexed layer term is literally invariant under whole-sequence negation.

The finite layer block is N-invariant.

6. hTae, in the exact shape the transport asks for #

hTae discharged at T := tailSeriesGauge m.

Almost surely, the value of the upper shell series dominates every truncated layer block, at the sample AND at the negated sample. The second conjunct is free: it is the first one composed with the pointwise N-invariances of §5, so no law-level symmetry input is consumed.

7. The transport with hTae discharged #