Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.ExcessDecay.BoundaryCaccioppoliDatum

BoundaryCaccioppoliDatum #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

The boundary regime of the coarse-grained Caccioppoli inequality with #

l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS is stated with a boundary datum h, and its right-hand side carries the extra leg t^{-3} Λ_t ‖∇h‖²_{H^{2t}(□_0)}. This module proves the other half of the printed lemma's own proof, the boundary reduction:

let v be the Dirichlet solution on the whole cube with the same force g and the same boundary datum h; then u - v has zero trace on all of ∂□_0 and solves the homogeneous equation, so the zero-data theorem applies to it, and the ∇h-leg is produced separately by the global energy estimate for ∇v.

Landed here: everything about u - v.

Main results #

What is not done here #

Three things separate this from the printed boundary display on x + □_n:

  1. the triangle inequality ‖σ^{1/2}∇u‖ ≤ ‖σ^{1/2}∇(u-v)‖ + ‖σ^{1/2}∇v‖ on the core (a quadratic-form Minkowski step);
  2. the volume-ratio conversion of the global energy norm of v to the core (a d-only constant, needing a lower bound on |caccioppoliCoreSet Q x|);

None of the three is asserted anywhere in this file.

References #

2. The flux pairing and the homogeneous difference equation #

The flux a ∇u of an H¹ function is square integrable on the cube: the coefficient field has an everywhere-elliptic representative (CoarseGraining's publicCoeffField) agreeing with it almost everywhere.

The difference of two forced solutions with the same force is a solution of the homogeneous equation. This is the first step of the printed proof of l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS.

3. The zero force is admissible #

The zero force has the H^s regularity CoarseGraining's Caccioppoli theorem asks of its right-hand side.