Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.ExcessDecay.BoundaryCoveringTrace

BoundaryCoveringTrace #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

The boundary datum on the covering cube #

The last hypothesis CoarseGraining's boundary coarse Caccioppoli inequality asks of its datum, once the covering cube of BoundaryCoveringGeometry is in place, is the localized zero trace through the Dirichlet patch:

  LocalizedZeroTraceFunctionOn (c + □_k) (openCubeAtScale x (k-1)) (u - v) .

Here the ambient domain is □_m but the Caccioppoli domain is the smaller covering cube, so the H¹₀ witness has to descend. It does, and for exactly the reason the covering was designed: a cutoff supported in the patch multiplies the H¹₀(□_m) approximants into functions supported in patch ∩ □_m, and that set is inside the covering cube.

Main results #

What is not done here #

This is stated in the untranslated frame, with the covering cube as a translated set. Feeding it to CoarseGraining's theorem, which is stated at a TriadicCube, requires the A4 translation transport of the datum (sample translation); that step belongs to the development's TranslationTransport* lane and is not taken here. Nothing in this module asserts the Caccioppoli estimate.

References #

1. The H¹₀ descent #

H¹₀ descends along the support of its approximants.

If every smooth compactly supported approximant of u ∈ H¹₀(Ω) is supported in the open subset W ⊆ Ω, then u is an H¹₀(W) function: the same value, the same weak gradient, the same approximating sequence. Only the two L² convergences have to be re-read, and they are inherited because eLpNorm is monotone in the measure.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
    @[simp]
    theorem Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.ExcessDecay.h10RestrictOfApproxSupport_toFun {d : ℕ} {Ω W : Set (HCPolySupport.Vec d)} (hWopen : IsOpen W) (hWΩ : W ⊆ Ω) (u : HCPolySupport.H10Function Ω) (hsupp : ∀ (n : ℕ), tsupport (u.approx n) ⊆ W) :
    (h10RestrictOfApproxSupport hWopen hWΩ u hsupp).toFun = u.toFun

    2. The localized zero trace on a subdomain #

    The boundary datum descends to the covering set.

    A function with a global zero trace on Ω has the localized zero trace on any open W ⊆ Ω through any window V with V ∩ Ω ⊆ W.

    3. The instance at the well-placed covering cube #

    The Caccioppoli boundary datum on the covering cube.

    For k ≤ m, a function with a global zero trace on □_m has the localized zero trace on the well-placed covering cube c + □_k through the Dirichlet patch openCubeAtScale x (k-1) — the exact hypothesis of CoarseGraining's BoundaryForcedCaccioppoliDatum at an outer cube of scale k.

    The geometric input is BoundaryCoveringGeometry: the cube stays in □_m, and it covers the truncated patch (x+□_{k-1}) ∩ □_m.