Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.ExcessDecay.ConstantDatumCoreEnergy

ConstantDatumCoreEnergy #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

The interior Caccioppoli energy through a constant-datum comparison #

The interior specialization of l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS used by the proved interior lane (CaccioppoliInteriorDatum.exists_interiorCaccioppoliEnergy_subConst) applies CoarseGraining's boundary theorem to u - c and pays CoarseGraining's own force leg t^{-8} λ_{t,1}^{-1} [g]². This module runs the comparison form instead:

  E_core(∇u) = E_core(∇(u-c))
      ≤ 2 E_core(∇((u-c) - ρ)) + 2 E_core(∇ρ)
      ≤ 2 P (λ_{t,1} 3^{-2m} ‖(u-c) - ρ‖²_{L²(Q)}) + 2 · 18^d · E_Q(∇ρ) ,

where ρ is the cube's own zero-trace corrector at the same force g. The difference (u-c) - ρ solves the homogeneous equation, so CoarseGraining's force leg disappears from the Caccioppoli application altogether; the force reappears only through the two corrector bounds of ConstantDatumCorrector, both of which carry λ_{t,2}^{-1} explicitly and only t^{-3}. Splitting the L² object and inserting them gives the display of exists_constantDatumCoreEnergy below:

  E_core(∇u) ≤ K ( P λ_{t,1} ( 3^{-2m} ‖u - c‖²_{L²(Q)}
                              + (t^{-3} λ_{t,2}^{-1} [g]_{B^{2t}(Q)})² )
                  + t^{-3} λ_{t,2}^{-1} [g]²_{B^{2t}(Q)} ) .

The comparison object is c + ρ, i.e. the Dirichlet solution with the constant datum c; the two ∇h legs of the printed boundary display vanish for it, which is why no boundary-gradient term appears. Nothing here uses the good event: the display is deterministic and keeps λ_{t,1}, λ_{t,2} separate.

What this buys (disclosed) #

Against the proved interior display, the force envelope improves from t^{-8} to t^{-6} provided the caller can pay λ_{t,1} λ_{t,2}^{-2} ≲ σ^{-1} — which is exactly what the frozen theorem's good event gives. Nothing is gained deterministically: with only CoarseGraining's generic ellipticity comparison the two displays agree.

References #

1. The L² split #

2. The composition, on abstract reals #

3. The constant-datum core-energy display #

The interior Caccioppoli energy through the constant-datum comparison.

See the module docstring for the display. The comparison solution is c + ρ with ρ the cube's own zero-trace corrector; the boundary-gradient legs of the printed display vanish because the datum is constant, and the Caccioppoli force leg vanishes because the difference solves the homogeneous equation.