CoveringSlotObstruction #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
Where the boundary covering cube sits relative to the good-event slot #
max { σ_{n+2}⁻¹ Λ_{s/8,2}(□_{n+2}; ã) , σ_{n+2} λ_{s/8,2}(□_{n+2}; ã)⁻¹ }
at the sample τ_z ω — physically the cube z + □_{n+2}. So the question is
one about two cubes of the same scale:
c + □_{n+2} versus z + □_{n+2}.
This module answers it geometrically, in both directions.
eq_of_image_add_openCubeSet_subset— two open triadic cubes of the same scale are nested only when their centres coincide.inter_frontier_eq_empty_of_subset_openCubeSet— a set inside the open cube□_mmisses∂□_m.gate_of_coveringCube_subset_slot— the obstruction. Any centrecwhose cubec + □_{n+2}both (i) stays inside□_m(which the boundary lane requires: the anchor's solutionulives on□_monly) and (ii) stays inside the good-event slot's cubez + □_{n+2}, forces the anchor's own interior gate(z + □_{n+2}) ∩ ∂□_m = ∅. Contrapositive: on the branch the interior chain leaves open — the boundary regime — no admissible covering cube of the covering scale fits inside the slot cube, so no covering, subadditivity or descendant argument indexed by𝒢(n+2, z)can reach the covering cube's ellipticity data.image_add_wellPlacedCentre_subset_image_add_openCubeSet_succ— the positive half. The covering cube always fits insidez + □_{k+1}; atk = n+2that isz + □_{n+3}, the anchor's own window cube. So a slot at indexn+3does reach it, and the proved off-grid transport (OffGridComposeAssembly/OffGridErrorFluxCorrected, which require exactly a containmentw + □_k ⊆ □_Kof the off-grid cube in a grid cube) applies withK = n+3at depth one.
Nothing here transports any coefficient, error or ellipticity quantity: this
module is pure cube geometry, exactly like BoundaryCoveringGeometry. In
particular nothing below is an instance, or a fraction, of any source node.
References #
- ABK26,
l.harmonic.approximation.good.scales; the boundary application ofl.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS.
1. Two open cubes of the same scale #
2. The frontier gate from a containment in □_m #
3. The obstruction #
4. The positive half: the covering cube fits one scale up #
The clamp moves each coordinate by less than half a side of □_k.
The positive half.
The boundary covering cube always sits inside z + □_{k+1}, provided the window
centre x is within half a side of □_{k-1} of z — which is exactly what the
anchor's geometry binder gives at k = n+2.
Consequently a good-event slot at index n+3 does reach the covering cube:
the proved off-grid transports require precisely a containment of the off-grid
cube in a grid cube, and this is that containment at depth one.
The covering cube inside the anchor's own window cube.
At the boundary lane's covering scale k = n+2, under the frozen theorem's own
binders, c + □_{n+2} ⊆ z + □_{n+3}. Together with
gate_of_wellPlacedCentre_subset_slot this is the exact measurement: the
covering cube is outside the n+2 slot on the boundary branch, and inside the
n+3 one always.