OneStepWindows #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The one-step window family U_j = (x+□_{n-j}) ∩ □_m and its geometry #
l.excess.decay.good.scales runs on the truncated family
U_j := (x + □_{n-j}) ∩ □_m , j ∈ ℕ₀ ,
which is BoundaryLaneWindows.truncatedWindow x m (n-j). This module proves
the geometry every later leg of the one-step contraction reads off:
exists_axisCube_sandwich_truncatedWindow— the aspect-1/9sandwichaxisCube zin 3^{k-2} ⊆ (x+□_k) ∩ □_m ⊆ axisCube zout 3^k, obtained from the proved inscribed cube (image_add_wellPlacedCentre_subset_truncatedWindow, which sits at scalek-1) and the proved outer inclusion. This is the slot every…_of_axisCubeSandwichproducer of the excess layer consumes, and it is what makes the|W|^{-1/d}normalizer comparable to3^{-k}on a truncated window.- the volume bounds, the normalizer bounds, positivity, measurability, the
MemLp/IntegrableOnslots, and the explicit volume ratio of two nested windows of the family; affineExcess_truncatedWindow_le— excess quasi-monotonicity on the family, at the explicit ratio constant;image_add_wellPlacedCentre_subset_windowChoice— the window choice at the clamped centre.
The window choice #
The source asserts the existence of y ∈ □_m with both
y+□_{n-2} ⊆ (z+□_n) ∩ □_m and (x+□_{n-2}) ∩ □_m ⊆ y+□_{n-2} and exhibits no
construction; and the harmonic lemma instantiated at index n-2 in fact demands
the stronger inclusion y+□_{n-2} ⊆ (z+□_{n-1}) ∩ □_m, which the printed
window choice does not supply.
Both are supplied here at the explicit witness
y := wellPlacedCentre x m (n-2) (the coordinatewise clamp of x)
image_add_wellPlacedCentre_subset_windowChoice proves the stronger
inclusion y + □_{n-2} ⊆ (z+□_{n-1}) ∩ □_m from x ∈ (z+□_{n-3}) ∩ □_m and
n-2 ≤ m alone, and the second requirement is the proved
truncatedWindow_subset_image_add_wellPlacedCentre at j = k = n-2. The
half-width budget is 3^{n-2}/2 + 3^{n-2}/2 + 3^{n-3}/2 = 3.5·3^{n-3} against
the target 3^{n-1}/2 = 4.5·3^{n-3}: slack 3^{n-3}, so the witness is not
borderline. Note the clamp y is a full cube centre — the boundary-regime
obstruction described in BoundaryLaneWindows concerns the window (x+□_k) ∩ □_m itself, not the enclosing full cube, and the two are compatible.
1. Measurability and the sandwich #
The aspect-1/9 sandwich of a truncated window.
The proved inscribed cube sits at scale k-1; shrinking it to k-2 and
reading both inclusions in axisCube shape gives exactly the sandwich slot the
excess layer's …_of_axisCubeSandwich producers consume.
2. Volumes, normalizers and the analytic slots #
The two-sided comparison of the |W|^{-1/d} normalizer with the cube
normalizer 3^{-k} on a truncated window.
3. The volume ratio of two nested windows of the family #
The explicit ratio constant of the family: |U_l| / |U_k| ≤ 3^{(l-k+2)d} for
k ≤ l, raised to the excess exponent 1/d + 1/2.
Equations
Instances For
Excess quasi-monotonicity on the one-step family, at the explicit ratio
constant. This is the E(u,U_2) ≲ E(u,U_0) move of the triangle assembly.
4. The window choice at the clamped centre #
The window choice at the clamped centre.
With y := wellPlacedCentre x m (n-2) the full cube y + □_{n-2} lies
inside (z + □_{n-1}) ∩ □_m — one triadic scale sharper than the printed
requirement ⊆ (z + □_n) ∩ □_m, and exactly the inclusion the
harmonic-approximation anchor demands at its index n-2.
The second requirement of the printed window choice, at the same witness: the truncated window sits inside the full clamped cube.