HomCGCarrierEnergy #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The S-slot carrier comparison: the printed energy slot at BOTH spellings #
What this file supplies #
The obstruction was a single slot. The printed right-hand side of the general coarse-graining proposition carries the mesoscale energy
( Σ_{k ≤ n} 3^{-(s-s₁)p(n-k)} avsum_{z ∈ 3^k ℤ^d ∩ □_m}
‖σ^{1/2}∇u‖_{L²(z+□_k)}^p )^{1/p},
and the two transcriptions of that ONE object are
CoarseGraining'sweightedLocalSymmetricEnergyLp Q n hn a u s₁ s p— anℝ≥0∞-valuedtsumover ALL depths, with the per-cell energy given bylocalSymmetricEnergyENorm(the normalized⟪∇u, 𝐚_sym ∇u⟫integral);- this repository's
coarseGrainingEnergyPartial Q p (s-s₁) jn N Gen— a REAL-valued partial sum over the firstN+1depths, with the per-cell energy carried abstractly asGen.
weightedLocalSymmetricEnergyLp_le_ofReal is the comparison in the direction
the Step-4 consumption needs:
(∀ N, coarseGrainingEnergyPartial Q p wgap jn N Gen ≤ S) ⟹
weightedLocalSymmetricEnergyLp Q n hn a u s₁ s p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal S,
whenever Gen dominates the printed per-cell energy printedLocalEnergy,
(jn: ℤ) = Q.scale - n, and wgap ≤ s - s₁. The domination hypothesis is
free: printedLocalEnergy is a DEFINITION (the CoarseGraining per-cell
energy extended by 0 off the subcubes of Q), and
localSymmetricEnergyENorm_le_ofReal_printedLocalEnergy proves the domination
at Gen = printedLocalEnergy outright, because the CoarseGraining energy is
finite (localSymmetricEnergyENorm_ne_top).
THE ORDER CONSTRAINT (load-bearing, recorded here) #
The two spellings carry comparable geometric weights only when their order gaps
do. CoarseGraining's series is weighted by 3^{-(s-s₁)pj} at ITS pair (s₁, s); this repository's by 3^{-wgap·p·i}. So the comparison needs wgap ≤ s - s₁ — the hypothesis hw below. Read at the spine's bundle, where this
repository's gap is the s₁ = s/4 pin (wgap = 3s/4) and the display is
entered at a LOWER order s′ with its own s₁′, this says
s′ - s₁′ ≥ s - s/4 = 3s/4,
which forces s - s′ < s/4. The convenient choice s′ = s/2 is therefore NOT
admissible for this route; s′ = 7s/8, s₁′ = s/8 is, and the smaller order
loss s - s′ = s/8 only improves the duality window 0 < (s-s′)p′ < d.
1. The printed per-cell energy, as a total function on cubes #
The printed per-cell energy ‖σ^{1/2}∇u‖_{L²(R)}, as a total function
of the cell R.
On a subcube of Q it is CoarseGraining's localSymmetricEnergyENorm of the
restricted data; elsewhere it is 0. The dite is what turns the
CoarseGraining summand — which is indexed by a MEMBERSHIP proof — into a
function of the bare cube, so that it can sit in this repository's Gen slot.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The domination is free. The CoarseGraining per-cell energy is finite, so it is
recovered exactly by ENNReal.ofReal of its own real value.
2. Two pieces of bookkeeping #
3. THE CARRIER COMPARISON #
The S-slot comparison, in the direction the Step-4 consumption needs.
If this repository's abstract per-cell datum Gen dominates the printed
per-cell energy, and every partial ℓ^p sum of this repository's slot is below
S, then CoarseGraining's tsum spelling of the SAME printed slot is below
ENNReal.ofReal S.
The hypothesis hw is the order constraint recorded in the module docstring:
the CoarseGraining pair (s₁, s) must have order gap at least this
repository pair's wgap.