HomCGDischargeInstantiation #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The spine's own binders feed the printed coarse-graining display #
What is established #
HomCGDischargeAssembly proves the printed finite-p display at the
smooth-dual reading under CoarseGraining's own hypothesis spelling
(IsForcedEquation, IsScalarForcedEquation, HasH10Difference). The
spine's bundle (SpineDatumCoarseGrainingGauge of HomSpineRepClose) instead
carries two IsDirichletSolutionOn binders against a common boundary datum
h and a common forcing g:
hsol: IsDirichletSolutionOn (coefficientCutoff M.nu L ω).toCoeffField □_m u h g
hcomp: IsDirichletSolutionOn (fun _ => σ_m • 1) □_m v h g
This file shows that these two binders ARE the printed pair, with nothing added:
isForcedEquation_of_dirichletSolutionOn—hsolis-∇·𝐚∇u = ∇·𝐠;isScalarForcedEquation_of_dirichletSolutionOn—hcompis-∇·σ₀∇v = ∇·𝐠(scalarMatrix σ₀is by definitionσ₀ • 1, so the two spellings are the same function);hasH10Difference_of_dirichletPair— the two zero-trace-difference clauses against the SAMEhgiveu - v ∈ H¹₀(□_m), because(u - h) - (v - h) = u - vandH¹₀is closed under subtraction.
Then exists_printedCoarseGraining_of_dirichletPair restates the display with
exactly those binders.
The itemized spine-side feed #
For the CoarseGraining display at (m, n, s₁, s, s₂, p, 𝐚, σ₀, 𝐠, u, v) one
needs, and only needs:
CoarseGraining hypothesis | spine-side source |
|---|---|
2 ≤ d | standing |
2 ≤ p.exponent | the bundle's own p (it also carries s + d/p ≤ 1/2) |
n < m | the bundle's mesoscale depth jn, at n = m - jn, jn ≥ 1 |
s₁.1 < s.1 < s₂.1 | the s₁ = s/4 pin plus s < s₂ |
𝐚: CoeffOn (cubeDomain □_m) | coefficientCutoffCoeffOn M L ω □_m |
0 < σ₀ | hsig: 0 < σ_m |
𝐠 ∈ W^{s₂,p}(□_m) | NOT a spine binder — see the residue below |
-∇·𝐚∇u = ∇·𝐠 | hsol.isDivFormWeakSolutionOn |
-∇·σ₀∇v = ∇·𝐠 | hcomp.isDivFormWeakSolutionOn |
u - v ∈ H¹₀(□_m) | hsol.hasZeroTraceDifferenceOn + hcomp.… |
The single item the spine does not supply is the forcing regularity
MemCubeEuclideanFullWsp □_m s₂ p 𝐠: the bundle only carries 𝐠's Hölder
seminorm hKg. That is the honest residue of the instantiation layer, and it
is a hypothesis of the printed proposition itself (𝐠 ∈ W^{s₂,p}(□_m)), not an
artifact.
1. The three hypothesis bridges #
The spine's Dirichlet binder IS the printed heterogeneous equation.
The spine's comparator binder IS the printed scalar equation. No bridging
occurs: scalarMatrix σ₀ unfolds to σ₀ • 1, which is the spine's spelling.
Two Dirichlet solutions with a COMMON boundary datum differ by an
H¹₀ function. This is the printed u - v ∈ H¹₀(□_m), produced from the
spine's two binders and nothing else.
2. The printed display at the spine's binder shape #
The printed finite-p display, entered at the spine's own binders.
Same conclusion as exists_printedCoarseGrainingFiniteP_smoothDual, but the
elliptic pair is presented as the spine presents it: two Dirichlet solutions
on □_m against a common boundary datum h and a common forcing 𝐠.