Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Homogenization.HomCGDischargeInstantiation

HomCGDischargeInstantiation #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

The spine's own binders feed the printed coarse-graining display #

What is established #

HomCGDischargeAssembly proves the printed finite-p display at the smooth-dual reading under CoarseGraining's own hypothesis spelling (IsForcedEquation, IsScalarForcedEquation, HasH10Difference). The spine's bundle (SpineDatumCoarseGrainingGauge of HomSpineRepClose) instead carries two IsDirichletSolutionOn binders against a common boundary datum h and a common forcing g:

  hsol: IsDirichletSolutionOn (coefficientCutoff M.nu L ω).toCoeffField □_m u h g
  hcomp: IsDirichletSolutionOn (fun _ => σ_m • 1)                     □_m v h g

This file shows that these two binders ARE the printed pair, with nothing added:

Then exists_printedCoarseGraining_of_dirichletPair restates the display with exactly those binders.

The itemized spine-side feed #

For the CoarseGraining display at (m, n, s₁, s, s₂, p, 𝐚, σ₀, 𝐠, u, v) one needs, and only needs:

CoarseGraining hypothesisspine-side source
2 ≤ dstanding
2 ≤ p.exponentthe bundle's own p (it also carries s + d/p ≤ 1/2)
n < mthe bundle's mesoscale depth jn, at n = m - jn, jn ≥ 1
s₁.1 < s.1 < s₂.1the s₁ = s/4 pin plus s < s₂
𝐚: CoeffOn (cubeDomain □_m)coefficientCutoffCoeffOn M L ω □_m
0 < σ₀hsig: 0 < σ_m
𝐠 ∈ W^{s₂,p}(□_m)NOT a spine binder — see the residue below
-∇·𝐚∇u = ∇·𝐠hsol.isDivFormWeakSolutionOn
-∇·σ₀∇v = ∇·𝐠hcomp.isDivFormWeakSolutionOn
u - v ∈ H¹₀(□_m)hsol.hasZeroTraceDifferenceOn + hcomp.…

The single item the spine does not supply is the forcing regularity MemCubeEuclideanFullWsp □_m s₂ p 𝐠: the bundle only carries 𝐠's Hölder seminorm hKg. That is the honest residue of the instantiation layer, and it is a hypothesis of the printed proposition itself (𝐠 ∈ W^{s₂,p}(□_m)), not an artifact.

1. The three hypothesis bridges #

The spine's comparator binder IS the printed scalar equation. No bridging occurs: scalarMatrix σ₀ unfolds to σ₀ • 1, which is the spine's spelling.

Two Dirichlet solutions with a COMMON boundary datum differ by an H¹₀ function. This is the printed u - v ∈ H¹₀(□_m), produced from the spine's two binders and nothing else.

2. The printed display at the spine's binder shape #

The printed finite-p display, entered at the spine's own binders.

Same conclusion as exists_printedCoarseGrainingFiniteP_smoothDual, but the elliptic pair is presented as the spine presents it: two Dirichlet solutions on □_m against a common boundary datum h and a common forcing 𝐠.