HomProviderBAssembly #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
Theorem B, §4.5: the Theorem-B assembly off Theorem C #
What this file supplies #
exists_regularity_minimalScale — the Theorem-C export re-shaped at the §4.5
parameter web: at α:= homAlpha M = 1 - s/2 the minimal scale X_m(α) exists
with a tail at ONE model-independent constant C⋆ ≥ 1, together with the per-ω
energy-density display. This produces exactly the htail hypothesis of the
§4.5 spine's close step (the Cst slot) plus the display the residual step
consumes. It is UNCONDITIONAL.
Two arithmetic facts carry it: the printed observation in the paper that
α ∈ (0, 1 - C₀ γ^{1/2}] for small γ (homAlpha_le_one_sub here, off
absLog_mul_sqrt_le), and the monotonicity of the printed tail profile in its
own constant (regTail_mono_const).
1. The Theorem-C display, transcribed #
The per-ω conclusion of anomalous_regularity, byte for
byte from the frozen statement's ∀ᵐ ω body, with the root's C and alpha
and its minimal scale X as parameters.
This is the ONLY thing the §4.5 Step-2 energy slot consumes from Theorem C.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
2. The two arithmetic facts of the re-shaping #
The printed observation, formalized: at the §4.5 web α = 1 - s/2 sits inside
Theorem C's admissible range α ≤ 1 - C₀ √γ once γ ≤ (8C₀)⁻⁴.
The only ingredient is |log γ|√γ ≤ 4 γ^{1/4} (absLog_mul_sqrt_le): the
printed "if γ is sufficiently small" made explicit.
The printed tail profile is monotone in its own constant.
K ↦ K exp(-(a(N-K))/(Kγ)) = K exp((a/γ)(1 - N/K)) increases in K > 0 for
every N ≥ 0, so Theorem C's tail at its own C implies the spine's tail at
any C⋆ ≥ C. This is what lets the spine's Cst slot be filled by
max 1 C.
3. Theorem C, re-shaped at the §4.5 web #
THE MINIMAL SCALE, AT THE §4.5 PARAMETER WEB.
The anomalous_regularity read at α:= homAlpha M = 1 - s/2: one
model-independent C⋆ ≥ 1 and one threshold γ₀ > 0 such that for every model
and every scale m the minimal scale X exists, is measurable, has the
spine's own tail profile at C⋆, and carries the per-ω energy-density
display.
htail of the §4.5 spine's close step is exactly the second conjunct.