HomSpineSupFormClause #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The D1 re-cut, fork (iii): the SUP-over-depths clause carrier #
Why a sup-over-depths carrier #
The manuscript aggregates depths by SUP, not by ℓ^p. Its Step-3 display reads
3^{-ms} σ_m ‖∇u - ∇v‖_{W_hat^{-s,∞}(□_m)}
≤ C s^{-1} σ_m^{1/2} 𝓔_{s₁,∞,1} ·
sup_{k ≤ n} 3^{-(s-s₁)(n-k)} max_{z ∈ 3^k ℤ^d ∩ □_m}
ν^{1/2} ‖∇u‖_{L²(z+□_k)} + (forcing term),
i.e. p = ∞ on BOTH sides. This repository's earlier clause carrier put
the ℓ^p-over-depths aggregate on the left. That
was a transcription choice, not the print's shape, and the refutation record
(HomSpineCzGridGaugeRefuted) together with its |log γ|^{1/p} necessity are
properties OF THAT CHOICE: the flat field's sup is O(1) while its ℓ^p
aggregate is not.
This file gives the sup-over-depths sibling and the one fact that makes the re-cut worth doing:
negBesovSupPartialNorm—sup_{j ≤ N}of the SAME per-depth gauge terms (negBesovLpDepthSeminorm) theℓ^pcarrier sums. No new geometry: the depth weight is the print's own3^{-s j}.NegBesovSupGaugeBound— the unbounded-Nform,∀ j, which is exactly what every downstream consumer of theℓ^pgauge actually uses (seeHomSpineSupFormRethread).CoarseGrainingSupMultiscale— the clause sibling at the sup left-hand side, with the energy slot LEFT AT ITSℓ^pSPELLING (that slot is where the finite-pCoarseGrainingtheorem enters; see the D3 section below). One caveat. The depth-jGLOBAL comparison named below is not realizable at aγ-uniform constant: there is a far-band Gagliardo costΣ_{i<j} 3^{-i s p'} ≍ min(j, (s p')⁻¹)for the depth-jcheckerboard test, saturating at≈|log γ|^{1/p'}over the Step-3 depth range⌈10|log γ|⌉. The print's carrier is per CELL, not per depth: the per-cell re-cut of §§1--4 reads the gauge atsup_j max_{R ∈ D_j}and needs only a single-CELL test. Everything here remains correct and is the intermediate reading (sup over depths of theℓ^pcell mean); §5 (D3) is independent of the cut.NegativeBesovGridSmoothDualConverseAtDepth+ofReal_negBesovSupPartialNorm_le_of_depthConverse— THE CONSUMPTION INTERFACE. The sup-form clause needs the grid/smooth-dual comparison only ONE DEPTH AT A TIME; the depth-uniform constantCAis the only input, and no sum over depths is ever formed. This is the slot the single-depth single-depth dual test family fills; it is a NAMED INPUT here, never proved. So the supply's clause conjunct is producible at aγ-uniform constant exactly whenCAisγ-uniform; the refuted depth-summed(★)is never used.
The D3 factor #
coarseGrainingGeomFactor p w = (1 - 3^{-wp})^{-1/p} is the price the finite-p
energy slot pays over the print's sup-form energy datum (the mesoscale energy
bound). It is ≤ 3/2 with NO γ-dependence as soon as 1 ≤ w·p, and it is at
least (w·p·log 3)^{-1/p} always, so on the complementary range w·p ≤ 1 it is
genuinely of size (w p)^{-1/p}.
At the §4.5 pin w = s/4 this says: the factor is O(1) iff s·p ≳ 4, i.e.
iff p is allowed to grow like |log γ|. So D3 is not a second, independent
obstruction — it is the SAME question as item (a) (a p-uniform
Calderón--Zygmund constant on a range reaching p ≈ 4/s), quantified.
1. The sup-over-depths gauge carrier #
The sup-over-depths partial gauge, sup_{j ≤ N} 3^{-sj} [·]_{depth j}.
The p = ∞ sibling of the ℓ^p-over-depths gauge: the SAME per-depth terms, with
the outer ℓ^p sum replaced by the maximum. This is the aggregation shape the
manuscript's W_hat^{-s,∞} display uses.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Every depth term the sup reaches is below it.
The sup is below any bound on the depth terms it reaches.
2. The unbounded-depth form, and its two equivalent readings #
The sup-form gauge bound at level A: every depth term of the printed
grid gauge is below A. This is 3^{-ms}[F]_{B^{-s}_{p,∞}(□_m)} ≤ A, the
p = ∞ depth aggregation the manuscript's display carries.
Equations
- Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Homogenization.NegBesovSupGaugeBound Q s p A F = ∀ (j : ℕ), Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Homogenization.negBesovLpDepthSeminorm Q s p F j ≤ A
Instances For
The two readings agree: a level for every truncation is a level for every depth.
3. The clause sibling at the sup left-hand side #
THE SUP-FORM MULTISCALE CLAUSE — the print's own aggregation.
The transcribed multiscale clause with the left-hand
ℓ^p-over-depths aggregate replaced by the sup, i.e. the manuscript's Step-3
display shape. The energy slot is deliberately LEFT at its
ℓ^p spelling: that slot is the one the finite-p CoarseGraining theorem
(exists_localCoarseGrainingLp) supplies, and moving it to the sup is the D3
question, not a transcription choice (section 5).
THIS IS A HYPOTHESIS. It is never proved in this repository.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The Step-3c leg of the sup-form clause.
The flux leg is discarded (the source's own route (ii) in the paper) and the
printed σ_m weight stripped; the output is the sup-form gauge bound at the
level the Step-3c consumers take.
4. THE CONSUMPTION INTERFACE: one depth at a time #
The single-depth grid/smooth-dual comparison.
The depth-summed grid/smooth-dual converse asks for the FULL
ℓ^p-over-depths Besov seminorm against the smooth dual — that is the shape
refuted above, because the depth sum contributes (1-3^{-sp})^{-1/p}. The
sup-form clause never forms that sum: it needs the comparison at ONE depth j
at a time, with the constant CA uniform in j,
( 3^{sp(m-j)} avsum_{R ∈ D_j} ‖(F)_R‖^p )^{1/p}
≤ CA · ‖F‖_{W_hat^{-s,p}(□_m), smooth dual}.
THIS IS A HYPOTHESIS, and it is the ONLY external input of
supGauge_of_depthConverse. It is the slot the single-depth dual-test family
(a dual test family at one depth) fills: one test function per depth, not
one test function per depth-tower.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
One depth term of this development gauge against the smooth dual.
The depth-j bridge ofReal_negBesovLpDepthSeminorm_rpow_le, rooted, composed
with the single-depth comparison. No sum over depths occurs.
THE SUP-FORM GAUGE, FROM THE SINGLE-DEPTH COMPARISON ALONE.
Given the single-depth comparison at every depth with one constant CA, the
whole sup-over-depths partial gauge is below √d · 3^{-sm} · CA times the
smooth dual norm — with NO geometric factor and NO depth sum, because the sup
is realized depth-wise.
This is the exact shape in which the sup-form clause consumes the family.