Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Homogenization.HomSpineSupFormClause

HomSpineSupFormClause #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

The D1 re-cut, fork (iii): the SUP-over-depths clause carrier #

Why a sup-over-depths carrier #

The manuscript aggregates depths by SUP, not by ℓ^p. Its Step-3 display reads

  3^{-ms} σ_m ‖∇u - ∇v‖_{W_hat^{-s,∞}(□_m)}
    ≤ C s^{-1} σ_m^{1/2} 𝓔_{s₁,∞,1} ·
        sup_{k ≤ n} 3^{-(s-s₁)(n-k)} max_{z ∈ 3^k ℤ^d ∩ □_m}
          ν^{1/2} ‖∇u‖_{L²(z+□_k)}  +  (forcing term),

i.e. p = ∞ on BOTH sides. This repository's earlier clause carrier put the ℓ^p-over-depths aggregate on the left. That was a transcription choice, not the print's shape, and the refutation record (HomSpineCzGridGaugeRefuted) together with its |log γ|^{1/p} necessity are properties OF THAT CHOICE: the flat field's sup is O(1) while its ℓ^p aggregate is not.

This file gives the sup-over-depths sibling and the one fact that makes the re-cut worth doing:

The D3 factor #

coarseGrainingGeomFactor p w = (1 - 3^{-wp})^{-1/p} is the price the finite-p energy slot pays over the print's sup-form energy datum (the mesoscale energy bound). It is ≤ 3/2 with NO γ-dependence as soon as 1 ≤ w·p, and it is at least (w·p·log 3)^{-1/p} always, so on the complementary range w·p ≤ 1 it is genuinely of size (w p)^{-1/p}.

At the §4.5 pin w = s/4 this says: the factor is O(1) iff s·p ≳ 4, i.e. iff p is allowed to grow like |log γ|. So D3 is not a second, independent obstruction — it is the SAME question as item (a) (a p-uniform Calderón--Zygmund constant on a range reaching p ≈ 4/s), quantified.

1. The sup-over-depths gauge carrier #

The sup-over-depths partial gauge, sup_{j ≤ N} 3^{-sj} [·]_{depth j}.

The p = ∞ sibling of the ℓ^p-over-depths gauge: the SAME per-depth terms, with the outer ℓ^p sum replaced by the maximum. This is the aggregation shape the manuscript's W_hat^{-s,∞} display uses.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    The sup is below any bound on the depth terms it reaches.

    2. The unbounded-depth form, and its two equivalent readings #

    The sup-form gauge bound at level A: every depth term of the printed grid gauge is below A. This is 3^{-ms}[F]_{B^{-s}_{p,∞}(□_m)} ≤ A, the p = ∞ depth aggregation the manuscript's display carries.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The two readings agree: a level for every truncation is a level for every depth.

      3. The clause sibling at the sup left-hand side #

      THE SUP-FORM MULTISCALE CLAUSE — the print's own aggregation.

      The transcribed multiscale clause with the left-hand ℓ^p-over-depths aggregate replaced by the sup, i.e. the manuscript's Step-3 display shape. The energy slot is deliberately LEFT at its ℓ^p spelling: that slot is the one the finite-p CoarseGraining theorem (exists_localCoarseGrainingLp) supplies, and moving it to the sup is the D3 question, not a transcription choice (section 5).

      THIS IS A HYPOTHESIS. It is never proved in this repository.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        theorem Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Homogenization.CoarseGrainingSupMultiscale.gradGauge {d : ℕ} {Q : HCPolySupport.TriadicCube d} {jn : ℕ} {Ccg s s1 s2 p sigma E1 E2 Dg : ℝ} {Gen : HCPolySupport.TriadicCube d → ℝ} {Fgrad Fflux : HCPolySupport.Vec d → HCPolySupport.Vec d} (h : CoarseGrainingSupMultiscale Q jn Ccg s s1 s2 p sigma E1 E2 Dg Gen Fgrad Fflux) {S : ℝ} (hS : ∀ (N : ℕ), coarseGrainingEnergyPartial Q p (s - s1) jn N Gen ≤ S) (hsigma : 0 < sigma) :
        NegBesovSupGaugeBound Q s p (sigma⁻¹ * coarseGrainingFinitePRHS Ccg s s2 sigma E1 E2 Dg S (Q.scale - ↑jn)) Fgrad

        The Step-3c leg of the sup-form clause.

        The flux leg is discarded (the source's own route (ii) in the paper) and the printed σ_m weight stripped; the output is the sup-form gauge bound at the level the Step-3c consumers take.

        4. THE CONSUMPTION INTERFACE: one depth at a time #

        The single-depth grid/smooth-dual comparison.

        The depth-summed grid/smooth-dual converse asks for the FULL ℓ^p-over-depths Besov seminorm against the smooth dual — that is the shape refuted above, because the depth sum contributes (1-3^{-sp})^{-1/p}. The sup-form clause never forms that sum: it needs the comparison at ONE depth j at a time, with the constant CA uniform in j,

          ( 3^{sp(m-j)} avsum_{R ∈ D_j} ‖(F)_R‖^p )^{1/p}
              ≤ CA · ‖F‖_{W_hat^{-s,p}(□_m), smooth dual}.
        

        THIS IS A HYPOTHESIS, and it is the ONLY external input of supGauge_of_depthConverse. It is the slot the single-depth dual-test family (a dual test family at one depth) fills: one test function per depth, not one test function per depth-tower.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          One depth term of this development gauge against the smooth dual.

          The depth-j bridge ofReal_negBesovLpDepthSeminorm_rpow_le, rooted, composed with the single-depth comparison. No sum over depths occurs.

          THE SUP-FORM GAUGE, FROM THE SINGLE-DEPTH COMPARISON ALONE.

          Given the single-depth comparison at every depth with one constant CA, the whole sup-over-depths partial gauge is below √d · 3^{-sm} · CA times the smooth dual norm — with NO geometric factor and NO depth sum, because the sup is realized depth-wise.

          This is the exact shape in which the sup-form clause consumes the family.