HomStepFourPairing #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
Theorem B, §4.5, Step 4: the pairing carrier #
The object #
Step 4 uses the negative norm ‖·‖_{W_hat^{-s,∞}(□_m)} in exactly one way, the
two duality pairings of the manuscript:
|⨍_{□_m} ∇v · F| ≤ ‖∇v‖_{W^{s,∞}(□_m)} ‖F‖_{W_hat^{-s,∞}(□_m)}.
The manuscript never defines W_hat^{-s,p} (the manuscript defines only the
order -1 duals, and it defines those by duality: a supremum of ∫_U f g
over a normalized test class). Following that pattern — and the corrected
rendering of the same symbol — the carrier here is the
duality form: WeakNegDualBoundOn Q s W F is the family of pairing
inequalities. The Step-4 pairing is then a theorem
(WeakNegDualBoundOn.pairing) rather than an assumption.
The test gauge #
wsInftyGauge Q s Ksup KHol = 3^{-s·Q.scale} · Ksup + KHol is the printed display's
volume-normalized Hölder norm ‖φ‖_{C^{0,s}(□_m)} = |□_m|^{-s/d}‖φ‖_{L^∞} + [φ]_{C^{0,s}}, which the manuscript declares interchangeable with
‖·‖_{W^{s,∞}(□_m)} up to dimensional constants. Both halves are carried:
The manuscript's Step-4 test function is ∇v, whose mean does not vanish,
so the L^∞ half is load-bearing (see the disclosure below).
Two inequivalent renderings of one printed symbol #
The §4.5 negative-norm symbol is consumed at two sites that demand inequivalent objects:
- Step 3c (the
L^∞upgrade) needs the multiscale reading — a bound on the cube averages ofFat every scale (this file'snegBesovInftyNorm, this file'sUniformBoxGaugeBound). A single-scale duality bound does not give it: it losesr^{-d}(machine-checked). - Step 4 (here) needs the duality reading. The multiscale reading does not
give it either: pairing
B^{s}_{∞,∞}againstB^{-s}_{∞,∞}diverges logarithmically in the number of scales (the increments contribute a constant per scale).
Neither implies the other. Both are legitimate readings of an undefined printed symbol; each Step consumes the one it needs, and each is disclosed at its own consumption site.
The hat #
The printed display's W_hat^{-1,p'} restricts the test class to mean-zero
g. Under the hatted reading the pairing above is valid only for mean-zero
φ; the general φ splits as φ = (φ)_{□_m} + (φ - (φ)_{□_m}) and the
constant part pairs against ⨍_{□_m} F. weakNegDual_of_hat_of_mean_zero
records the case in which the two coincide — ⨍_{□_m} F = 0, which is exactly
the gradient leg F = ∇u - ∇v with u - v ∈ H¹₀(□_m). For the flux leg
F = a_L∇u - σ_m∇v the mean does not vanish and is not controlled by the
hatted norm; that is the second half of the correction draft.
1. The pairing functional #
⨍_{□} F · φ, the volume-normalized pairing of two vector fields on the
open realization of a triadic cube.
Equations
- Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Homogenization.cubePairing Q F phi = HCPolySupport.volumeAverage (HCPolySupport.openCubeSet Q) fun (x : HCPolySupport.Vec d) => HCPolySupport.vecDot (F x) (phi x)
Instances For
2. The test gauge ‖φ‖_{W^{s,∞}(□_m)} #
the printed display's volume-normalized Hölder norm on □_m,
3^{-s·m}‖φ‖_{L^∞(□_m)} + [φ]_{C^{0,s}(□_m)}, presented at the two explicit
data Ksup and KHol rather than as a constructed norm.
Equations
Instances For
3. The duality-form negative gauge #
‖F‖_{W_hat^{-s,∞}(□_m)} ≤ W, in duality form (a correction to the printed statement).
The predicate is the family of pairing inequalities the manuscript uses:
for every test field φ with volume-normalized Hölder norm at most
wsInftyGauge Q s Ksup KHol,
|⨍_{□} F · φ| ≤ W · (3^{-s·m} Ksup + KHol).
This is the printed display's own definitional pattern for the negative-order
duals, transported from order -1 to order -s. CoarseGraining's
cubeEuclideanNegativeWspSmoothDualENorm
(Homogenization/Sobolev/Fractional/EuclideanWspSmoothDual.lean) is the same
construction at a bundled L² carrier and smooth tests; the lightweight
predicate here is the one the §4.5 consumers need.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The Step-4 pairing — a theorem, not an assumption, because the carrier is the duality form.
The duality bound is monotone in its level.