SensitivitySwitch #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The field switch a_{n−2} ⟶ a_{j−2} at a triadic cube #
ABK26, §4.1, the first inequality of the
sensitivity switch of l.localize.lambdas.for.regularity:
λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(z+□_{j−2}; a_{n−2})
≤ 6 ( 1 + C 3^{2j} ‖∇(k_{n−2} − k_{j−2})‖_{W^{1,∞}(z+□_{j−2})}
λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(z+□_{j−2}; a_{j−2}) )^{2γ/(1−2γ)}
λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(z+□_{j−2}; a_{j−2}) .
The manuscript reads this off l.J.sensitivity.no.conditions's display
e.lambda.sensitivity.no.conditions at a := a_{j−2}, h := k_{n−2} − k_{j−2},
s = t = γ, q = 2 — hence the literal factor 6 and the exponent
2γ/(1−2γ).
This module performs the transport to an arbitrary triadic cube Q = z + □_l
at the actual cutoff fields, using only proved, pointwise, unconditional
Section 3 machinery:
BadEvents.unitRescaledCutoffCoeff/unitCubeLambda_unitRescaledCutoffCoeff— theλ-gauge ofa_ronQis the frozen unit-cube gauge of the rescaled coefficient object (an equality, no side condition);BadEvents.perturbCoeffOn_unitRescaledCutoffCoeff_aeEq/unitCubeLambda_perturbCoeffOn_unitRescaledCutoffCoeff— the frozen perturbation of the rescaleda_jby the rescaled incrementk_n − k_jis the rescaleda_n(forj ≤ n);BadEvents.gradientW1Infinity_incrementUnitCube₂_le— the anchor's unit-cube gauge is belowincrementOscGauge₂ Q j n, which is the manuscript's3^{2l} ‖∇(k_n − k_j)‖_{W^{1,∞}(z+□_l)}.
Nothing here is a.e. in the sample and nothing is conditional on a good local
event: unlike the Section 3 consumers of the conditional anchor
Frozen.Section24.lambda_sensitivity, the unconditional anchor needs no gate,
which is exactly why §4.1 can cite it as l.J.sensitivity.no.conditions.
The carrier identification #
Section4/Support/Events.lean writes the 𝒢₀ atom as the centered literal of
Observable/CutoffMultiscaleEllipticity.lean read at the translated sample.
lambdaAnnulusAtom_eq_inv_lambdaSq identifies it with λ_{γ,2}^{-1} of the
Chapter 2 carrier on the honest triadic cube z + □_{k−2}, which is what the
sensitivity statement above is phrased at. It is the composition of two proved
Section 3 identities and carries no hypothesis.
What is not here #
The 𝒢₁-derived budget 3^{2j}‖∇(k_{n−2}−k_{j−2})‖_{W^{1,∞}(z+□_{j−2})} ≤^{(1+γ)(m−j)/4} — the second inequality of the step — is not proved here.
References #
- ABK26,
l.localize.lambdas.for.regularity, the sensitivity switch. l.J.sensitivity.no.conditions/e.lambda.sensitivity.no.conditions, the anchorFrozen.Section24.lambda_sensitivity_unconditional.d.good.event.for.lambda.
1. The triadic cube of a lattice point #
The triadic cube z + □_j at the lattice point z = 3^j v of 3^j ℤ^d,
i.e. the cube of scale j and integer index v.
Equations
- Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Localize.latticeCube j v = { scale := j, index := v }
Instances For
The base point of latticeCube j v is the Section 4 lattice point
Support.triadicLatticePoint j v.
2. The 𝒢₀ atom is λ_{γ,2}^{-1} at the Chapter 2 carrier #
The carrier identification. The Section 4 support layer's 𝒢₀ atom at
the lattice point 3^{k−2} v is λ_{γ,2}^{-1}(z + □_{k−2}; a_{k−2}) of the
Chapter 2 coefficient family of the actual cutoff, on the honest triadic cube.
This is the composition of the proved off-centre identification
BadEvents.cubeLowerEllipticityInvLiteral_translateCutoffSample with the
proved Multiscale.cubeLowerEllipticityInvLiteral_eq_lambdaSq_inv; it holds at
every sample point and carries no hypothesis.