ProportionAssembly #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The §4.1 proportion assembly, in the printed display #
ABK26, §4.1, p.independence.between.scales.
ShiftedInterface.exists_ratioTail_goodEventBase_shift composes the two proved
lanes with the 𝒢₂ slot and delivers, at every base m₀ and every window n,
a tail exp(−c₁n) for the clause avsum 𝟙{𝒢} ≤ 1 − θ. This module turns that
lane package into the printed display itself:
ℙ[ (M_w+1)⁻¹ ∑_{k ≤ M_w} 𝟙{𝒢(m₀+k, 0; s, ε)} ≤ 1 − θ ] ≤ 6 exp(−A(M_w+1)) ,
with A read off the model. Three things separate the two shapes and all three
are discharged here.
- The level ceiling. The two proved lanes need
θ(r+1) < 1, which the printedθ ≤ ½does not give oncer ≥ 2. The lanes are run atθ/(8L),L = r+1, and the conclusion is read back atθbymeasure_mono; the factorLis absorbed into the assembly's own constant (ProportionArith). - The rate. With
c₁ = 2Aone hasexp(−2A·M_w) ≤ 6 exp(−A(M_w+1))for everyM_w ≥ 1. The printed prefactor6is exactly what pays for the(M_w+1)-versus-M_woffset. - The single-scale window. At
M_w = 0the composed tail is1and the printed right-hand side is6exp(−A), so the lane package must be read at a different window:{ω ∉ 𝒢(m₀)}carries bad-density½over{m₀, m₀+1}, so the window-1endpoint bounds it.
The form delivered, and what blocks the printed one #
exists_proportionTail_of_honestG1 is the assembly proper: the display, at an
abstract rate A, from the honest 𝒢₁ condition C(1+2A)γ ≤ θ c⋆ s⁶ ε². The
frozen theorem's printed clauses (s⁻⁴, s⁵) do not imply that condition on
a nonempty parameter region: the minimal sufficient strengthening is the level
clause at s⁻⁶ and the rate at s⁷, proved in LaneCertificates
(couplingG1_of_anchor). The honest 𝒢₁
condition is therefore an interface obligation of the consumer, not a source
premise.
References #
- ABK26,
p.independence.between.scales;d.good.event.for.lambda, (e.lambda.good.events);e.theta.cond.two.
1. The common dependence range #
The dependence range of the assembly. The three lanes are run at one
range: the one the composed two-lane interface fixes, enlarged so that the
count 3 + (2/3)√d ≤ 3^r also holds at it. The 𝒢₂ endpoint is stated at
every admissible range, so this choice costs nothing.
Equations
Instances For
2. The display from the lane package #
The printed display from the two output forms of the lane package.
The good-proportion endpoint at the split level θ_L covers every window
M_w ≥ 1; the bad-density endpoint at window 1 covers M_w = 0, where the
printed clause is the single bad event 𝒢(m₀)ᶜ. Running the lanes at the rate
2A is what makes both branches land under 6exp(−A(M_w+1)).
3. The assembly at the honest 𝒢₁ condition #
The §4.1 proportion display, at an abstract rate, from the honest 𝒢₁
condition.
One constant C(d) ≥ 1, fixed before the model and before every parameter. For
every model, every s, ε ∈ (0, ½], every level θ ∈ (0, ½] and every rate
A ≥ 0 subject to
- the printed regime
γ ≤ C⁻¹c⋆¹⁰, - the printed level clause
C c⋆⁻²s⁻⁴ε⁻²γ ≤ θ, - the honest
𝒢₁conditionC(1+2A)γ ≤ θ c⋆ s⁶ ε²,
the printed display holds at every base m₀ and every window length M_w,
including M_w = 0, with right-hand side 6exp(−A(M_w+1)).
The 𝒢₂ lane enters as the named hypothesis hG2, in the LaneTailFrom shape,
at exactly the one level θ/(32(r+1)) and the one rate 2A the assembly
consumes — the shape the shifted 𝒢₂ lane produces at
r = laneRange d (admissible by laneRange_gap), for every ε above its own
threshold ε₀. It is a caller-supplied interface obligation, not a source
premise.