RootAssemblyParameters #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
t.regularity root assembly, part one: the parameter web and the single a.e. block #
The two defects this module clears #
The proved outer chain is → → →, each layer re-exporting its predecessor. Two structural defects block the root assembly, and both are fixed here at Z mathematical cost (no new estimate, no new hypothesis).
(D1) The chain is lossy. The Step-3 window/budget endpoint drops
GoodScaleWindows, and the Step-7a selection endpoint drops in addition the
ε_j cap. But GoodScaleWindows is exactly what's
stepFiveConcreteOscillationResult_of_stepFourDecay demands, at the same ω,
the same (n,m) and the same X-gate. Because each layer re-derives its OWN
existential Z and its OWN (C₁,γ₀,C) cannot be invoked side by side and
their witnesses identified. rootAssembly_aePackage below carries
GoodScaleWindows, the window/budget package AND the Step-7a selection in ONE
∀ᵐ ω block under ONE Z and ONE (C₁,γ₀,C).
(D2) C₁ is opaque. The Step-1/3/7a producers export C₁ as an
existential real with 2 ≤ C₁, while the Step-6 endpoint needs it spelled out
as stepOneC1 d Cedos Cann Citer k, with Cann a further existential hidden
inside the ε_j-cap proof (ae_stepOneEpsJ_le).
rootAssembly_aePackage exports Cann and the defining identity, so the
produced C₁ is consumable by the pointwise layer.
Enlarging the produced constant #
The frozen root uses ONE letter C in four roles: the tail prefactor, the tail
exponent (twice), the α-range α ≤ 1 - C√γ, and the prefactor of
e.energy.density.estimate. The §4.4 chain produces its estimate constant
independently of the minimal-scale constant, so the assembly must take a
maximum. §3 proves that every role is MONOTONE-W in C: enlarging C
weakens the tail bound and shrinks the admissible α-range, so a single
maximum is legitimate. This is the arithmetic behind "the single C in all
three roles", and it is proved here rather than asserted.
References #
- ABK26,
t.regularity; Steps 1--3 and 7a.
1. The per-ω payload of the single a.e. block #
The Step-1/3/7a payload at one window [n,m]: the good-scale windows of
p.minimal.scale.separation.sec4 (the input's Step-5 endpoint reads)'s window
family / bad set / budget / separation package's Step-7a selection at every
printed lattice centre.
Packaging the three together is what lets ONE filter_upwards serve the whole
per-ω chain.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The payload from the good-scale windows alone, at the gate. Every component
beyond GoodScaleWindows is a proved pointwise consequence:'s
stepThreeWindowsAndBudget_of_goodScaleWindows's
exists_stepSevenSelectionData_of_stepThreeWindowsAndBudget.
2. The single a.e. endpoint, with C₁ transparent #
t.regularity Steps 1--3 and 7a, as one a.e. theorem with a transparent
C₁.
The frozen root's binder block with the minimal scale X, its measurability,
its tail, and a single ∀ᵐ ω block whose payload is RootWindowPayload —
good-scale windows, the 14 ≤ m-n gate consequence, the
window/bad-set/budget/separation package and the Step-7a selection at every
printed lattice centre, all at one Z and one (C₁,γ₀,C).
C₁ is produced spelled out as stepOneC1 d Cedos Cann Citer k, at a
caller-supplied Cann and a caller-supplied Step-1 index k ≥ 11, so the
pointwise §4.4 layer — whose statements name stepOneC1 transparently — can be
applied at the produced constant. The three floors travel with it.
C_edos is the abstract excess-decay one-step constant, C_iter the abstract
Step-6 iteration constant.
3. Enlarging the produced constant #
The tail bound is monotone-weakening in C.
The frozen root prints ONE constant in the tail's three slots, so an assembly that
must also serve e.energy.density.estimate needs to enlarge it. The enlargement is
free: with 0 < C₀ ≤ C and N ≥ 0,
C₀·exp(−(1−α)²(N−C₀)/(C₀γ)) ≤ C·exp(−(1−α)²(N−C)/(Cγ)) .
The prefactor grows and the exponent rises (because N/C ≤ N/C₀), so the
right-hand side dominates.
The α-range at an enlarged constant. Enlarging C shrinks the admissible
range, so the producer's own range hypothesis follows from the enlarged one —
the direction the assembly needs.