StepSevenCaccMatching #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
t.regularity Step 7c: matching l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS to the Β§4.4 data #
The target, and the gap this module closes #
Step 7c says only
Since
n'is a good scale, we may apply the coarse-grained Caccioppoli inequality and the oscillation bounde.oscillation.Holder.boundat scalen'to obtain a gradient bound.
The exponent pin (the one real choice, and it is forced) #
The Caccioppoli's forcing slot is π β H^{2t}. So the Β§4.4 datum determines
t completely:
2 t = s_{Β§4.4} = 1/4 βΉ t = 1/8 = stepSevenCaccT
and the Caccioppoli's own first exponent is taken to be s_{Β§4.4} = 1/4 as
well, giving
Ο = 1 - 1/4 - 1/8 = 5/8 > 0 .
Nothing else is available: any other t would measure the forcing at an
exponent Β§4.4 never produces.
The binder-by-binder match #
Each binder of l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS, against the Β§4.4 datum that
discharges it.
s β (0,1)βstepOneS = 1/4. Discharged,stepSevenCaccS_lt_one.t β (0,1/2],Ο = 1-s-t > 0βstepSevenCaccT = 1/8,Ο = 5/8. Discharged,stepSevenCaccT_lt_halfand the positivity ofΟ.x β β‘_0(the Dirichlet-patch centre) β the good-scale centre: the patch contains its own centre, so the patch inclusion implies it.π β L^β(β‘_0; β_+^{dΓd})β the truncated fieldπ_{L,n'}(e.infrared.cutoff.def). Discharged as aCoeffFamilybinder.u β H^1(β‘_0)with-βΒ·πβu = βΒ·πβ the Β§4.4 solution onβ‘_m, restricted to the good-scale cube. Discharged byIsForcedEquationtogether with S4.3'sEquationRestriction.π β H^{2t}(β‘_0;β^d)β[π ]_{H^{1/4}(U_{n'})}, itself coming from[π ]_{W^{1/2,β}(β‘_m)}. Discharged at the exponent (2t = 1/4, the pin); theW^{1/2,β} β H^{1/4}embedding isnormalizedGagliardoESeminormOn_stepThreeWindow_quarter_le. What remains: the GagliardoH^sβ CoarseGrainingForceBesovRegularity/scaleNormalizedPositiveBesovVectorSeminormTwocarrier bridge is not performed here.h β H^{1+2t}(β‘_0)with(h)_{β‘_0} = 0βββhβ_{W^{1/2,β}(β‘_m)}. Not dischargeable from any proved source β see the residues below. The mean-zero normalization is itself free: onlyβhand the trace class ofu - hare used, and both are invariant underh β¦ h - c.- the unit-cube normalization
β‘_0β the good-scale cube at scalen'. Discharged, and at zero cost: CoarseGraining does not state the lemma at the unit cube. This is the largest single item the manuscript's silence hides. - the boundary condition
u = hon(ββ‘_0) β© (x + β‘_{-1})β Β§4.4'su = honββ‘_m.
The two residues, stated exactly #
(R1) the βh leg is not formalized anywhere. CoarseGraining proves
l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS only at zero localized
boundary data: its datum BoundaryForcedCaccioppoliDatum carries
LocalizedZeroTraceFunctionOn, and its right-hand side
boundaryCaccioppoliWithRHSRHS has exactly two summands (the parent LΒ² mass
and the π -Besov mass). The printed third summand
t^{-3} Ξ_t(β‘_0;π) ββhβΒ²_{H^{2t}(β‘_0)} comes from move 3 of the printed proof,
which is not formalized here (it needs the mean-zero-boundary fractional Sobolev
embedding e.fractional.Sobolev.embedding.zero.bndr applied to h itself). The
boundary cubes of Theorem C consume the estimate with the h-term switched on
but never need it in the ββhβ-only normal form, so the boundary-data defect is
carried as data β it vanishes identically on interior cubes. The Step-7c display
therefore carries the βh leg as an opaque scalar (dataH, guarded by the
indicator 1_{z β β‘_{m-1}}), and this module makes no claim about it.
(R2) the truncated window is not a cube. Every proved form of the lemma
lives on a triadic cube (caccioppoliCoreSet Q x β openCubeSet Q), while Β§4.4's
window is the truncation U_j = (z + β‘_j) β© β‘_m.
References #
- ABK26,
l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS. - ABK26,
t.regularityStep 7c; Step 1. - CoarseGraining,
Homogenization/Book/Ch03/Theorems/CoarseCaccioppoliRHS.lean(coarseCaccioppoliRHSTheory).
1. The exponent pin #
The Caccioppoli's first exponent at the Β§4.4 pin. It is Β§4.4's own s = 1/4 (e.parameter.choices.regularity).
Equations
Instances For
The Caccioppoli's second exponent at the Β§4.4 pin. Determined by the
forcing slot: l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS measures π in H^{2t}, and
Β§4.4 measures it in H^{1/4}, so 2t = 1/4.
Equations
Instances For
The pin, in the form that states WHY it is forced: twice the Caccioppoli's
second exponent is Β§4.4's own exponent, so the forcing slot H^{2t} IS the
H^{1/4} slot of Steps 4--7.
2. The prefactor and the forcing factor at the pin #
3. The coarse-grained Caccioppoli, at the Β§4.4 pin #
l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHS, instantiated at the Β§4.4 exponent pin.
For every triadic cube Q, every coefficient family a, every forced HΒΉ(Q)
solution u whose Dirichlet patch x + β‘_{Q.scale-1} sits inside Q, and every
real c,
β¨_{β‘_Q β© (x+β‘_{Q.scale-2})} βu Β· π βu
β€ prefactor(C,Q,a,1/4,1/8) Β·
( Ξ»_{1/8,1} Β· 3^{-2Β·scale} Β· βu - cβΒ²_{LΒ²(Q)}
+ 8^8Β·(4/3) Β· Ξ»_{1/8,1}^{-1} Β· [π ]Β²_{B^{1/4}(Q)} ) ,
with the forcing seminorm displayed at Β§4.4's own exponent stepOneS = 1/4
(this is the pin 2t = s_{Β§4.4}, two_mul_stepSevenCaccT).
Unconditional in d; the surviving hypotheses are exactly the pinned lemma's
own equation, patch and forcing-regularity binders. The βh leg of the
printed display is absent β see residue (R1) of the module docstring.