Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Regularity.StepSevenLambdaStability

StepSevenLambdaStability #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

t.regularity Step 7b, clause (A): l.lambdas.stability at s* = 1/16 #

The target #

ABK26 l.lambdas.stability (statement, proof):

  There is C(d) < ∞ such that for every p, q ∈ [1,∞], s, t ∈ (0,1/2] with s < t,
  and x ∈ □_0 with x + □_{-1} ⊆ □_0,
      λ_{t,q}^{-1}(x+□_{-1}; a) ≤ C(1-2s)^{-1}(t/(t-s))^{2/q} λ_{s,q}^{-1}(□_0; a) ,
      Λ_{t,q}(x+□_{-1}; a)      ≤ C(1-2s)^{-1}(t/(t-s))^{2/q} Λ_{s,q}(□_0; a) .

That is what is delivered here, at the printed prefactor shape C/(1-2s*)·(t/(t-s*))^{2/q} with the explicit constant C = 2.

Carrier scope: what is delivered, and the one restriction #

Ch02.lambdaSq/Ch02.LambdaSq are functions of a TriadicCube d, which is a scale : ℤ together with an integer index : Fin d → ℤ. A cube y + □_{k-1} with y off the scale-(k-1) lattice is therefore not an object of the carrier at all: the printed lemma's hypothesis "x ∈ □_0 with x + □_{-1} ⊆ □_0" ranges over arbitrary real x, and for non-lattice x the term λ_{t,q}(x+□_{-1}; a) does not type.

What is expressible, and what this module proves, is the printed inequality for the lattice-aligned configuration: the inner cube is a triadic descendant of the outer one. That is exactly the printed configuration when the Step-7a sandwich centre can be taken to be the window centre itself (y' = z, i.e. when z + □_{k'-1} ⊆ □_m, so the clamp is the identity), and the outer/inner pair is (z + □_{k'}, z + □_{k'-1}) — a parent and its centre child. Everything downstream in §4.4 runs on originCube d k with the translation absorbed into the coefficient family and the solution's argument (see StepSevenMean.exists_stepSevenEnd_chain_of_lambda_hmeanFree), so this is the configuration the proved chain consumes.

The proof, and what CoarseGraining supplied #

The printed proof builds a Whitney-type family and sums a geometric series. In the lattice-aligned configuration none of that is needed: CoarseGraining already proves the two halves separately and the lemma is their composition.

So the honest constant of the composition is 3^{2s*} = 3^{1/8} ≤ 2, and the printed prefactor — whose smallest possible value at s* = 1/16 is C·8/7 ≥ 8/7 — dominates it at C = 2. The printed C(d) is realized dimension-free here; that is a strengthening, not a weakening.

Strengthenings (binders dropped) #

What is NOT built here #

The 𝓔 twin e.mathcalE.stability. §4.4's Step 7b applies only the λ and Λ displays (e.lambda.stability.applied).

References #

1. The re-specified stability index and the printed prefactor #

The fixed exponent used for the seventh-step stability comparison.

Equations
Instances For

    The fixed multiplicative constant used for the seventh-step stability comparison.

    Equations
    Instances For

      The exponent factor is at least 1: t/(t-s) ≥ 1 and 2/q ≥ 0.

      3^{2s*} = 3^{1/8} ≤ 2: the honest constant of the lattice-aligned composition.

      The honest constant is dominated by the printed prefactor at s* = 1/16 and C = 2: 3^{1/8} ≤ 2 ≤ (16/7)·(t/(t-s*))^{2/q}.

      2. The two CoarseGraining halves #

      Index monotonicity of λ^{-1} on one cube (e.ellipticities.monotone.ordered): λ_{s,q}^{-1} is nonincreasing in the index.

      The one-scale descent weight at depth one: multiscaleDescendantWeight Q (Q.scale - 1) s = 3^{2s}.

      3. Clause (A), general depth #

      Clause (A), lower constant, at a general descendant scale. For every descendant R of Q at scale k and every index pair s < t,

        λ_{t,q}^{-1}(R; a) ≤ 3^{2s(Q.scale-k)} · λ_{s,q}^{-1}(Q; a) .
      

      Clause (A), upper constant, at a general descendant scale.

        Λ_{t,q}(R; a) ≤ 3^{2s(Q.scale-k)} · Λ_{s,q}(Q; a) .
      

      4. Clause (A) in the printed shape, at s* = 1/16 #

      Clause (A), the printed lower display e.lambda.stability at the re-specified index, in the lattice-aligned configuration: for every triadic cube Q, every centre child / one-scale descendant R, every t > s* and every admissible q ∈ [1,∞],

        λ_{t,q}^{-1}(R; a)
          ≤ C(1-2s*)^{-1}(t/(t-s*))^{2/q} λ_{s*,q}^{-1}(Q; a) ,      C = 2 .
      

      Clause (A), the printed upper display e.big.Lambda.stability at the re-specified index, in the lattice-aligned configuration:

        Λ_{t,q}(R; a) ≤ C(1-2s*)^{-1}(t/(t-s*))^{2/q} Λ_{s*,q}(Q; a) ,      C = 2 .
      

      5. The lattice-aligned Step-7a sandwich pair #

      The centre child □_{k-1} ⊆ □_k: the lattice-aligned instance of the Step-7a sandwich, in which the clamp of StepSevenSandwich.exists_sandwich_centre is the identity (y' = z) and the translation is absorbed into the coefficient family.