StepSevenLambdaStability #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
t.regularity Step 7b, clause (A): l.lambdas.stability at s* = 1/16 #
The target #
ABK26 l.lambdas.stability (statement, proof):
There is C(d) < ∞ such that for every p, q ∈ [1,∞], s, t ∈ (0,1/2] with s < t,
and x ∈ □_0 with x + □_{-1} ⊆ □_0,
λ_{t,q}^{-1}(x+□_{-1}; a) ≤ C(1-2s)^{-1}(t/(t-s))^{2/q} λ_{s,q}^{-1}(□_0; a) ,
Λ_{t,q}(x+□_{-1}; a) ≤ C(1-2s)^{-1}(t/(t-s))^{2/q} Λ_{s,q}(□_0; a) .
That is what is delivered here, at the printed prefactor shape
C/(1-2s*)·(t/(t-s*))^{2/q} with the explicit constant C = 2.
Carrier scope: what is delivered, and the one restriction #
Ch02.lambdaSq/Ch02.LambdaSq are functions of a TriadicCube d, which is a
scale : ℤ together with an integer index : Fin d → ℤ. A cube y + □_{k-1}
with y off the scale-(k-1) lattice is therefore not an object of the
carrier at all: the printed lemma's hypothesis "x ∈ □_0 with x + □_{-1} ⊆ □_0" ranges over arbitrary real x, and for non-lattice x the term
λ_{t,q}(x+□_{-1}; a) does not type.
What is expressible, and what this module proves, is the printed inequality for
the lattice-aligned configuration: the inner cube is a triadic descendant of the
outer one. That is exactly the printed configuration when the Step-7a sandwich
centre can be taken to be the window centre itself (y' = z, i.e. when z + □_{k'-1} ⊆ □_m, so the clamp is the identity), and the outer/inner pair is (z + □_{k'}, z + □_{k'-1}) — a parent and its centre child. Everything downstream
in §4.4 runs on originCube d k with the translation absorbed into the
coefficient family and the solution's argument (see
StepSevenMean.exists_stepSevenEnd_chain_of_lambda_hmeanFree), so this is the
configuration the proved chain consumes.
The proof, and what CoarseGraining supplied #
The printed proof builds a Whitney-type family and sums a geometric series. In the lattice-aligned configuration none of that is needed: CoarseGraining already proves the two halves separately and the lemma is their composition.
- index monotonicity on ONE cube —
Ch02.lambdaSq_mono,Ch02.LambdaSq_antitone(ABK26e.ellipticities.monotone.ordered):λ_{s,q}^{-1}andΛ_{s,q}are nonincreasing in the index, so passing fromtdown tos*costs nothing; - one-scale descent at a fixed index —
Ch02.descendant_lambdaSq_inv_le,Ch02.descendant_LambdaSq_le(ABK26e.bound.one.cube.by.lambdas): a descendant at scalekcosts3^{2s(m-k)}, here3^{2s*}.
So the honest constant of the composition is 3^{2s*} = 3^{1/8} ≤ 2, and the
printed prefactor — whose smallest possible value at s* = 1/16 is C·8/7 ≥ 8/7 — dominates it at C = 2. The printed C(d) is realized dimension-free
here; that is a strengthening, not a weakening.
Strengthenings (binders dropped) #
- the printed range binder
t ≤ 1/2is NOT taken: the estimate is proved for everyt > s*; - the printed
p ∈ [1,∞]binder is absent because thepof the printed lemma belongs only to its third display (the𝓔twin), which is not built here; - the constant is dimension-free.
What is NOT built here #
The 𝓔 twin e.mathcalE.stability. §4.4's Step 7b applies only the λ and
Λ displays (e.lambda.stability.applied).
References #
- ABK26,
l.lambdas.stability;e.lambda.stability.applied;e.ellipticities.monotone.ordered;e.bound.one.cube.by.lambdas.
1. The re-specified stability index and the printed prefactor #
The fixed exponent used for the seventh-step stability comparison.
Equations
Instances For
The fixed multiplicative constant used for the seventh-step stability comparison.
Instances For
The printed exponent factor (t/(t-s))^{2/q}, with the q = ∞ endpoint
value 1 (the limit of the finite-q expression).
Equations
Instances For
The stability prefactor including the scale-gap exponent factor.
Equations
Instances For
The exponent factor is at least 1: t/(t-s) ≥ 1 and 2/q ≥ 0.
3^{2s*} = 3^{1/8} ≤ 2: the honest constant of the lattice-aligned
composition.
The honest constant is dominated by the printed prefactor at s* = 1/16 and C = 2: 3^{1/8} ≤ 2 ≤ (16/7)·(t/(t-s*))^{2/q}.
2. The two CoarseGraining halves #
Index monotonicity of λ^{-1} on one cube
(e.ellipticities.monotone.ordered): λ_{s,q}^{-1} is nonincreasing in the
index.
The one-scale descent weight at depth one: multiscaleDescendantWeight Q (Q.scale - 1) s = 3^{2s}.
3. Clause (A), general depth #
Clause (A), lower constant, at a general descendant scale. For every
descendant R of Q at scale k and every index pair s < t,
λ_{t,q}^{-1}(R; a) ≤ 3^{2s(Q.scale-k)} · λ_{s,q}^{-1}(Q; a) .
Clause (A), upper constant, at a general descendant scale.
Λ_{t,q}(R; a) ≤ 3^{2s(Q.scale-k)} · Λ_{s,q}(Q; a) .
4. Clause (A) in the printed shape, at s* = 1/16 #
Clause (A), the printed lower display e.lambda.stability at the
re-specified index, in the lattice-aligned configuration: for every triadic
cube Q, every centre child / one-scale descendant R, every t > s* and
every admissible q ∈ [1,∞],
λ_{t,q}^{-1}(R; a)
≤ C(1-2s*)^{-1}(t/(t-s*))^{2/q} λ_{s*,q}^{-1}(Q; a) , C = 2 .
Clause (A), the printed upper display e.big.Lambda.stability at the
re-specified index, in the lattice-aligned configuration:
Λ_{t,q}(R; a) ≤ C(1-2s*)^{-1}(t/(t-s*))^{2/q} Λ_{s*,q}(Q; a) , C = 2 .
5. The lattice-aligned Step-7a sandwich pair #
The centre child □_{k-1} ⊆ □_k: the lattice-aligned instance of the
Step-7a sandwich, in which the clamp of
StepSevenSandwich.exists_sandwich_centre is the identity (y' = z) and the
translation is absorbed into the coefficient family.
Clause (A) at the Step-7a sandwich pair (□_{k-1}, □_k), both displays, in
the printed indexing (k'-1, k').