Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Schauder.CubeSchauderCampanato

CubeSchauderCampanato #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

Cube Schauder: the Campanato bound of the zero-datum solution #

The rate resolution, made explicit #

Per triadic step of size k the two rates are

  theta_k = lipschitzContractionConst d · 3^{-k}      (the contraction)
  rho_k   = √(3^{-k})                                  (the freezing gain)

theta_k / rho_k = lipschitzContractionConst d · √(3^{-k}) → 0, so the gap is uniform as soon as k is large; schauderStepSize d is such a k (and ≥ 3, the one-step machinery's own requirement). With the C^{0,1/2} interior atom one would instead get theta_k = C(d)·√(3^{-k}) = C(d)·rho_k — no gap at any k, the Campanato exponent strictly below 1/2 and the frozen external's inclusive endpoint s ≤ 1/2 unreachable. That is why the composition is routed through the Lipschitz atom.

At the sharp gap the Campanato bound reads, on the window family W_j = (x + □_j) ∩ □_m of a point x of the interior half-cube □_{m-1},

  E(w, W_j) ≤ schauderCampanatoConst d · KG · √(3^j)     for every j ≤ m,

w the zero-datum H¹₀(□_m) solution of -Δw = ∇·G and KG the C^{0,1/2} seminorm of G — the Campanato characterization of ∇w ∈ C^{0,1/2}, with exponent exactly 1/2.

Main results #

What this module does not do #

It is the interior regime: the base point x is restricted to the interior half-cube □_{m-1}, which is what makes the geometry slot x + □_{j-2} ⊆ □_m of the one-step producer available at every scale.

References #

1. Two arithmetic helpers #

theorem Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Schauder.sqrt_pow_nat {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 ≤ t) (i : ℕ) :
√(t ^ i) = √t ^ i

√(t^i) = (√t)^i.

theorem Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.Schauder.zpow_sub_mul_step (m : ℤ) (k i : ℕ) :
3 ^ (m - ↑i * ↑k) = 3 ^ m * (3 ^ (-↑k)) ^ i

The triadic scale at step i of the iteration factorizes.

4. The excess at the top scale #

The constant of the top-scale excess: 9 · √((3²)^d) · C_Poincaré(d) · d.

Equations
Instances For

    1. The constant #

    2. The normalized L² bound on the whole cube #

    The zero-datum solution is small in L²(□_m).

    Freezing the forcing at G(0), the sharp energy bound and the Dirichlet Poincaré inequality give

      ‖w‖_{L²(□_m)} ≤ C_Poincaré(d)·d·KG·3^m·√(3^m) .
    

    The excess of the zero-datum solution at the top scale.

    E(w, (x+□_m) ∩ □_m) ≤ schauderInitialConst d · KG · √(3^m). The proof is the freezing identity at the constant G(0) (a zero-trace test function does not see a constant forcing), the sharp energy bound, the coordinate dictionary and the Dirichlet Poincaré inequality — the same four steps as the one-step residue, run once at the top scale.