DirichletSolvability #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
Solvability of the localized Dirichlet problems, and uniqueness up to null sets #
Section 5 names two solutions on y + □_n: the solution u_m of
-∇·a_m∇u = ∇·g for the cutoff coefficient field at scale m, and the
comparator v solving -σ_n Δ v = ∇·g. Naming them presupposes that they
exist, and using them in a supremum presupposes that the family they range over
is nonempty. This module supplies both existence statements on the translated
carrier, and the uniqueness that holds at this level of regularity: two
solutions of the same problem agree away from a null set.
Pointwise uniqueness is a statement about a continuous representative, not
about the H¹ witnesses; it belongs to the representative theory and is not
proved here.
Main results #
exists_isDirichletSolutionAt_comparator— the comparator exists for every1/2-Hölder forcing field.exists_isDirichletSolutionAt_cutoff— the rough-field solution exists for every1/2-Hölder forcing field, at every scalemand every sample.isDirichletSolutionAt_ae_unique— two solutions of the same problem, for a coefficient field that is elliptic on the cube, have gradients and values that agree almost everywhere on the cube.
The ellipticity hypothesis of the uniqueness statement #
isDirichletSolutionAt_ae_unique carries IsEllipticFieldOn lam Lam on the
cube. This is a genuine premise, not a convenience: for a degenerate
coefficient field the Dirichlet problem has many solutions, so no
hypothesis-free uniqueness statement is true. Both families used by Section 5
satisfy it — the comparator with lam = Lam = σ_n, the cutoff field with
lam = ν — and the two hypothesis-free specializations
isDirichletSolutionAt_ae_unique_comparator and
isDirichletSolutionAt_ae_unique_cutoff are recorded below.
References #
- ABK26, the localized Dirichlet problems of Section 5.1.
Two H¹ witnesses with the same value and gradient are equal: the remaining
fields are propositions.
An H¹ witness on □_n, read on y + □_n as x ↦ v(x - y).
Equations
Instances For
2. Hölder data on the translated cube #
The C^{0,α} bound transports to the origin cube.
On the translated cube in dimension d ≥ 1, a Hölder bound forces its
constant to be nonnegative.
A Hölder-continuous vector field on y + □_n is square integrable there.
3. Existence for the comparator #
The comparator exists. For every scale, centre and 1/2-Hölder forcing
field the constant-coefficient Dirichlet problem -σ_n Δ v = ∇·g on y + □_n
with zero boundary values has a solution.
4. Existence for the rough field #
Every translated cube is contained in a centred cube of a large enough scale.
The rough-field solution exists. For every sample, every scale m,
every cube y + □_n and every 1/2-Hölder forcing field the Dirichlet problem
-∇·a_m∇u = ∇·g with zero boundary values has a solution.
5. Uniqueness away from a null set #
Two solutions of the same localized Dirichlet problem agree almost everywhere on the cube, gradient and value.
The ellipticity of a on the cube is a genuine premise: without it the
homogeneous problem has nonzero solutions.
The two families of Section 5 #
The comparator background is elliptic on the cube, with both constants
σ_n.
The cutoff coefficient field is elliptic on the cube, with lower constant the molecular diffusivity.
Two comparator solutions agree almost everywhere on the cube.
Two rough-field solutions agree almost everywhere on the cube.