Reduced and split composition algebras (GPR 22.16) #
The structure theorems in ranks two, four, and eight identify a reduced composition algebra with
the split quadratic algebra, twisted matrices on a line bundle, or twisted Zorn matrices on a
rank-three projective module. If constant-rank finite projectives over every idempotent factor are
free, the latter two presentations are the standard split models. This proves the converse half
of GPR 22.16; the LG-ring theorem follows because idempotent factors remain LG and their
constant-rank projectives are free (GPR 11.24, GN 2.6(b)).
⚠ On "division". In this file "division algebra" is expressed by
ConicAlgebra.HasTwoSidedInverses — every nonzero element has a two-sided inverse — which in
general is weaker than being a division algebra in the sense of GPR 8.6. For composition algebras
over a field, which are alternative, the two agree once 1 ≠ 0 (GPR 13.8,
ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isDivision_iff_hasTwoSidedInverses), and
ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_iff_not_isDivision restates the field case of GPR 22.18
with IsDivision; both are in Composition/Fields/Basic.lean.
Main results #
ConicAlgebra.isSplitOfRank_one: the rank-one case.ConicAlgebra.IsElementaryIdempotent.isSplitOfRank_two: the rank-two case.ConicAlgebra.IsElementaryIdempotent.isSplitOfRank_four_of_isLGRing: the rank-four case.ConicAlgebra.IsElementaryIdempotent.isSplitOfRank_eight_of_isLGRing: the rank-eight case.ConicAlgebra.IsReduced.isSplit_of_projectiveConstantRankFree: the converse ofGPR 22.16underGPR's own hypothesis, that constant-rank finite projectivek-modules are free;ConicAlgebra.IsElementaryIdempotent.ProjectiveConstantRankFree.onFactorspasses the hypothesis to the idempotent factors.ConicAlgebra.IsReduced.isSplit_of_projective_constantRank_free_on_factors: the same under the factorwise freeness hypothesis.ConicAlgebra.IsReduced.isSplit_of_isLGRing:GPR 22.16, reduced implies split over an LG ring.ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_iff_isGPRIsotropic_of_projectiveConstantRankFree,IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_iff_exists_isometryEquiv_dualProd_of_projectiveConstantRankFree:GPR 22.18(i) ↔ (ii) ↔ (iii) underGPR's hypothesis, in ranks two, four, and eight.ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_iff_isGPRIsotropic_of_isLGRing,ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_iff_exists_isometryEquiv_dualProd_of_isLGRing,ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_of_isometryEquiv_dualProd: the LG-ring case.ConicAlgebra.isGPRIsotropic_norm_of_isometryEquiv_dualProd: a hyperbolic norm is isotropic (GPR 22.9, (iv) ⇒ (iii)), with no hypothesis on the hyperbolic module.ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_iff_not_hasTwoSidedInverses: over a field, splitness is equivalent to failure of the division property (GPR 22.18).ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_iff_not_anisotropic_of_pid: over a PID, splitness is equivalent to the existence of a nonzero null vector (GPR 22.19).ConicAlgebra.IsComposition.isSplitOfRank_iff_not_noZeroDivisors_of_pid: over a PID, splitness is equivalent to having zero divisors (GPR 22.19).
Together with isSplitOfRank_iff_isGPRIsotropic_of_pid these are conditions (ii)–(v) of
GPR 22.19. Condition (i), splitness after extension to the fraction field, is
Composition/Fields/FractionField.lean.
References #
- [GN] Gille, Neher, Group schemes over LG-rings and applications to cancellation theorems and Azumaya algebras, European Journal of Mathematics 11 (2025), article 42, Lemma 2.6(b).
- [GPR] Garibaldi, Petersson, Racine, Albert Algebras over Commutative Rings, 11.24, 22.16, 22.18--22.19.
A constant-rank-one conic algebra over a nontrivial ring is the standard rank-one algebra.
The factor-stable freeness hypothesis used in the converse of GPR 22.16: every finite
projective module of constant rank over every idempotent factor of k is free.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
GPR's freeness hypothesis in GPR 22.16–22.18: every finitely generated projective
k-module of constant rank (in the universe w) is free. It holds over every LG ring
(ProjectiveConstantRankFree.of_isLGRing, GPR 11.24), and its factorwise form
ProjectiveConstantRankFreeOnFactors follows from it (ProjectiveConstantRankFree.onFactors).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
GPR's freeness hypothesis implies its factorwise form: a constant-rank projective module over
an idempotent factor k ⧸ (1 - e) is free, by Module.free_of_forall_free_of_isIdempotentElem.
Over an LG ring every finitely generated projective module of constant rank is free
(GPR 11.24, GN 2.6(b)), so GPR's freeness hypothesis holds.
Over a PID every finitely generated projective module is free, being torsion-free, so
GPR's freeness hypothesis holds; this is the freeness step of GPR 22.19.
GPR 22.16, rank two: a reduced constant-rank-two composition algebra is split.
GPR 22.16, rank four under its abstract freeness hypothesis.
GPR 22.16, rank four: over a nontrivial LG ring, a reduced constant-rank-four
composition algebra is split.
GPR 22.19, rank four: over a PID, a reduced constant-rank-four composition algebra is
split. The twisting line is projective, hence flat and torsion-free, and a finite torsion-free
module over a PID is free.
GPR 22.16, rank eight under its abstract freeness hypothesis.
GPR 22.16, rank eight: over a nontrivial LG ring, a reduced constant-rank-eight
composition algebra is split.
GPR 22.19, rank eight: over a PID, a reduced constant-rank-eight composition algebra is
split. The rank-three twisting module is projective, hence finite free over the PID.
Full converse of GPR 22.16, in a factor-stable formulation of its freeness hypothesis.
If finite projective constant-rank modules over the idempotent factors of k are free, every
reduced composition algebra over k is split. Together with IsSplit.isReduced, this gives both
directions of GPR 22.16 over arbitrary commutative rings satisfying that hypothesis.
GPR 22.16, converse, under GPR's own hypothesis. If every finitely generated projective
k-module of constant rank is free, every reduced composition algebra over k is split. The
hypothesis passes to the idempotent factors of the rank decomposition
(IsElementaryIdempotent.ProjectiveConstantRankFree.onFactors).
GPR 22.16, reduced ⇒ split over an LG ring. Each rank component has constant rank by
the rank decomposition. Its base is again LG because it is an idempotent factor; ranks four and
eight are therefore untwisted by freeness of constant-rank projective modules.
A hyperbolic norm is isotropic (GPR 22.9, (iv) ⇒ (iii)). If n ≅ dualProd k M, write
1 = e₁ + e₂ across the two totally isotropic summands: the preimage (φ, m) of 1 has
φ m = n(1) = 1, so m is unimodular and (0, m) is a unimodular null vector. No hypothesis on
M is needed.
GPR 22.18, split ↔ isotropic, under GPR's hypothesis. If every finitely generated
projective k-module of constant rank is free, a composition algebra of constant rank two, four,
or eight is split exactly when its norm has a unimodular null vector. The reverse implication
produces an elementary idempotent (GPR 22.9) and then untwists the reduced model with the
freeness hypothesis (GPR 22.16).
GPR 22.18, split ↔ hyperbolic, under GPR's hypothesis. If every finitely generated
projective k-module of constant rank is free, a composition algebra of constant rank two, four,
or eight is split exactly when its norm is hyperbolic, i.e. isometric to
QuadraticForm.dualProd k M for a finitely generated projective M. Forwards, an elementary
idempotent gives the Peirce presentation peirceHyperbolicIsometryEquiv (GPR 22.9,
(i) ⇒ (iv)); backwards, a hyperbolic norm is isotropic
(isGPRIsotropic_norm_of_isometryEquiv_dualProd).
GPR 22.18, split ↔ hyperbolic over an LG ring: the case of
isSplitOfRank_iff_exists_isometryEquiv_dualProd_of_projectiveConstantRankFree where the
freeness hypothesis is GPR 11.24.
GPR 22.18, split ↔ isotropic over an LG ring. For a constant-rank composition
algebra of rank two, four, or eight, splitness is equivalent to the existence of a unimodular null
vector. The forward implication transports the elementary idempotent of the standard model; the
reverse implication uses GPR 22.9 and the reduced classification of GPR 22.16.
GPR 22.18, hyperbolic ⇒ split over an LG ring. A norm isometric to a hyperbolic form
QuadraticForm.dualProd k M is isotropic (isGPRIsotropic_norm_of_isometryEquiv_dualProd), with
no hypothesis on M; the split/isotropic equivalence finishes the argument.
GPR 22.18, split ↔ not division over a field. For a constant-rank composition algebra
of rank two, four, or eight, splitness is equivalent to the failure of the property that every
nonzero element has a two-sided inverse.
GPR 22.19, split ↔ GPR-isotropic over a PID. For a constant-rank composition algebra
of rank two, four, or eight, a unimodular null vector is equivalent to splitness. Projective
twisting modules are free over the PID, replacing the LG-ring freeness step in GPR 22.18.
GPR 22.19, split ↔ a nonzero null vector over a PID. This is where GPR's
unimodular-vector isotropy and mathlib's failure of anisotropy become equivalent, by
GPR Exc. 12.38(c) (QuadraticMap.isGPRIsotropic_iff_not_anisotropic_of_pid).
GPR 22.19, split ↔ zero divisors over a PID. Here "has zero divisors" is expressed
canonically as the negation of mathlib's NoZeroDivisors predicate.