Documentation

LeanPool.SingleCopyStabilizer.SharpExactLearning

Exact label compression with a sharp leading round count #

The numerical budget has leading term 2n rounds and 4n copies. The tail bound is for the explicit uniform-X-label process in ExactLearning; the connection of that process to Born-rule circuit execution is proved separately.

The reciprocal progress-rate bound for n qubits.

Equations
Instances For

    Explicit round budget preserving the leading coefficient two.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Two fresh copies per round, followed by one final computational readout.

      Equations
      Instances For
        theorem LeanPool.SingleCopyStabilizer.SharpExactLearning.roundBudget_formula (n : ℕ) (δ : ℝ) :
        roundBudget n δ = ⌈2 * ↑n + 4 + 8 * √((2 * ↑n + 4) * Real.log (1 / δ)) + 64 * Real.log (1 / δ)⌉₊

        Expanded round budget with no hidden asymptotic constants.

        theorem LeanPool.SingleCopyStabilizer.SharpExactLearning.confidence_log_nonneg (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδmax : δ ≤ 1) :
        0 ≤ Real.log (1 / δ)

        The logarithmic confidence parameter is nonnegative on the intended range.

        theorem LeanPool.SingleCopyStabilizer.SharpExactLearning.roundBudget_upper (n : ℕ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδmax : δ ≤ 1) :
        ↑(roundBudget n δ) < 2 * ↑n + 5 + 8 * √((2 * ↑n + 4) * Real.log (1 / δ)) + 64 * Real.log (1 / δ)

        Rounding adds less than one round to the explicit real-valued budget.

        theorem LeanPool.SingleCopyStabilizer.SharpExactLearning.copyBudget_upper (n : ℕ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδmax : δ ≤ 1) :
        ↑(copyBudget n δ) < 4 * ↑n + 11 + 16 * √((2 * ↑n + 4) * Real.log (1 / δ)) + 128 * Real.log (1 / δ)

        The resulting copy budget has leading coefficient four.

        theorem LeanPool.SingleCopyStabilizer.SharpExactLearning.copyBudget_linear (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδmax : δ ≤ 1) :
        ↑(copyBudget n δ) < 136 * (↑n + Real.log (1 / δ))

        An explicit universal-constant copy bound, valid for at least one qubit. The constant is conservative; copyBudget_upper retains the sharper leading coefficient four and square-root confidence term.

        The exact process's rank is bounded by the number of qubits.

        The reciprocal-sum hypothesis is discharged for every exact-process state.

        The explicit exact-learning label process succeeds with confidence 1-δ at every round count at least the sharp-leading-term budget. All progress-rate and reciprocal-sum hypotheses are proved, not assumed.

        Exact label compression in ceil(2n+4+8√((2n+4)log(1/δ))+64log(1/δ)) rounds, with failure probability at most δ.